Ahlefeldt Thomas, Haxter Stefan, Spehr Carsten, Ernst Daniel, Kleindienst Tobias
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Bunsenstr. 10, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Micromachines (Basel). 2021 Aug 14;12(8):961. doi: 10.3390/mi12080961.
Preparing and pre-testing experimental setups for flight tests is a lengthy but necessary task. One part of this preparation is comparing newly available measurement technology with proven setups. In our case, we wanted to compare acoustic Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to large and proven surface-mounted condenser microphones. The task started with the comparison of spectra in low-speed wind tunnel environments. After successful completion, the challenge was increased to similar comparisons in a transonic wind tunnel. The final goal of performing in-flight measurements on the outside fuselage of a twin-engine turboprop aircraft was eventually achieved using a slim array of 45 MEMS microphones with additional large microphones installed on the same carrier to drawn on for comparison. Finally, the array arrangement of MEMS microphones allowed for a complex study of fuselage surface pressure fluctuations in the wavenumber domain. The study indicates that MEMS microphones are an inexpensive alternative to conventional microphones with increased potential for spatially high-resolved measurements even at challenging experimental conditions during flight tests.
为飞行测试准备和预测试实验装置是一项漫长但必要的任务。这项准备工作的一部分是将新获得的测量技术与经过验证的装置进行比较。就我们的情况而言,我们想将声学微机电系统(MEMS)与大型且经过验证的表面安装电容式麦克风进行比较。这项任务始于在低速风洞环境中比较频谱。成功完成后,挑战升级为在跨音速风洞中进行类似比较。最终,通过使用由45个MEMS麦克风组成的细长阵列,并在同一载体上安装额外的大型麦克风以供比较,实现了在双引擎涡轮螺旋桨飞机机身外部进行飞行中测量的最终目标。最后,MEMS麦克风的阵列布置使得能够在波数域对机身表面压力波动进行复杂研究。该研究表明,MEMS麦克风是传统麦克风的一种廉价替代品,即使在飞行测试中具有挑战性的实验条件下,也具有在空间上进行高分辨率测量的更大潜力。