Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
The George Institute for Global Health, London W12 0BZ, UK.
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 9;13(8):2732. doi: 10.3390/nu13082732.
A nutrient profiling model (NPM) was developed in 2005 in the UK to regulate the marketing of foods to children. It was revised in 2018, but the new version has not been finalised. The Eatwell Guide (EWG) is the UK's official food-based dietary guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between the 2005 and 2018 versions of the NPM and the EWG. Using recent National Diet and Nutrition Surveys, we estimated the healthiness of individual diets based on an EWG dietary score and a NPM dietary index. We then compared the percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa for each combination of the EWG score and NPM index across the range of observed values for the 2005 and 2018 versions. A total of 3028 individual diets were assessed. Individuals with a higher (i.e., healthier) EWG score consumed a diet with, on average, a lower (i.e., healthier) NPM index both for the 2005 and 2018 versions. Overall, there was good agreement between the EWG score and the NPM dietary index at assessing the healthiness of representative diets of the UK population, when a low cut-off for the NPM dietary index was used, irrespective of the version. This suggests that dietary advice to the public is broadly aligned with NPM-based food policies and vice-versa.
一种营养素分析模型(NPM)于 2005 年在英国开发,用于规范儿童食品的营销。它在 2018 年进行了修订,但新版本尚未最终确定。饮食均衡指南(EWG)是英国官方的基于食物的饮食指南。本研究旨在评估 2005 年和 2018 年版本的 NPM 和 EWG 之间的一致性。使用最近的国家饮食和营养调查,我们根据 EWG 饮食评分和 NPM 饮食指数来估计个体饮食的健康程度。然后,我们比较了 EWG 评分和 NPM 指数在 2005 年和 2018 年版本的观测值范围内的每种组合的一致性百分比和 Cohen's kappa。共评估了 3028 个人饮食。对于 2005 年和 2018 年的版本,EWG 评分较高(即更健康)的个体的饮食 NPM 指数较低(即更健康)。总体而言,当使用较低的 NPM 饮食指数截止值时,无论版本如何,EWG 评分和 NPM 饮食指数在评估英国人口代表性饮食的健康程度方面具有良好的一致性。这表明,公众的饮食建议与基于 NPM 的食品政策基本一致,反之亦然。