Cummins Daniel D, Kochanski Ryan B, Gilron Roee, Swann Nicole C, Little Simon, Hammer Lauren H, Starr Philip A
School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Aug 10;15:725797. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.725797. eCollection 2021.
Many adaptative deep brain stimulation (DBS) paradigms rely upon the ability to sense neural signatures of specific clinical signs or symptoms in order to modulate therapeutic stimulation. In first-generation bidirectional neurostimulators, the ability to sense neural signals during active stimulation was often limited by artifact. Newer devices, with improved design specifications for sensing, have recently been developed and are now clinically available.
To compare the sensing capabilities of the first-generation Medtronic PC + S and second-generation Percept PC neurostimulators within a single patient.
A 42-year-old man with Parkinson's disease was initially implanted with left STN DBS leads connected to a PC + S implantable pulse generator. Four years later, the PC + S was replaced with the Percept PC. Local field potential (LFP) signals were recorded, both with stimulation OFF and ON, at multiple timepoints with each device and compared. Offline processing of time series data included artifact removal using digital filtering and template subtraction, before subsequent spectral analysis. With Percept PC, embedded processing of spectral power within a narrow frequency band was also utilized.
In the absence of stimulation, both devices demonstrated a peak in the beta range (approximately 20 Hz), which was stable throughout the 4-year period. Similar to previous reports, recordings with the PC + S during active stimulation demonstrated significant stimulation artifact, limiting the ability to recover meaningful LFP signal. In contrast, the Percept PC, using the same electrodes and stimulation settings, produced time series data during stimulation with spectral analysis revealing a peak in the beta-band. Online analysis by the Percept demonstrated a reduction in beta-band activity with increasing stimulation amplitude.
This report highlights recent advances in implantable neurostimulator technology for DBS, demonstrating improvements in sensing capabilities during active stimulation between first- and second-generation devices. The ability to reliably sense during stimulation is an important step toward both the clinical implementation of adaptive algorithms and the further investigation into the neurophysiology underlying movement disorders.
许多适应性深部脑刺激(DBS)范式依赖于感知特定临床体征或症状的神经特征的能力,以便调节治疗性刺激。在第一代双向神经刺激器中,在主动刺激期间感知神经信号的能力常常受到伪迹的限制。最近已经开发出具有改进的传感设计规格的新型设备,并且现在已在临床上可用。
在单一患者体内比较第一代美敦力PC + S和第二代Percept PC神经刺激器的传感能力。
一名42岁的帕金森病男性最初植入了连接到PC + S植入式脉冲发生器的左侧丘脑底核DBS电极。四年后,将PC + S替换为Percept PC。在每个设备的多个时间点记录刺激开启和关闭时的局部场电位(LFP)信号,并进行比较。时间序列数据的离线处理包括在后续频谱分析之前使用数字滤波和模板减法去除伪迹。对于Percept PC,还利用了窄频带内频谱功率的嵌入式处理。
在无刺激的情况下,两种设备在β范围内(约20Hz)均显示出峰值,并且在整个4年期间保持稳定。与先前的报告类似,在主动刺激期间使用PC + S进行的记录显示出明显的刺激伪迹,限制了恢复有意义的LFP信号的能力。相比之下,使用相同电极和刺激设置的Percept PC在刺激期间产生的时间序列数据经频谱分析显示在β波段有一个峰值。Percept的在线分析表明,随着刺激幅度的增加,β波段活动减少。
本报告强调了用于DBS的植入式神经刺激器技术的最新进展,证明了第一代和第二代设备在主动刺激期间传感能力的改进。在刺激期间可靠感知的能力是朝着自适应算法的临床应用以及对运动障碍潜在神经生理学的进一步研究迈出的重要一步。