• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有助于和阻碍数字抑郁预防项目实施的因素:基于学校的横断面研究。

Factors That Help and Hinder the Implementation of Digital Depression Prevention Programs: School-Based Cross-sectional Study.

机构信息

Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 27;23(8):e26223. doi: 10.2196/26223.

DOI:10.2196/26223
PMID:34448701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8433863/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital prevention programs that are delivered in a school environment can inoculate young people against depression. However, little is known about the school-based factors that help and hinder the implementation of these programs. Staff members are integral for supporting mental health programs in schools and are likely to have a wealth of expertise and knowledge about the factors that affect implementation.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing a digital depression prevention program in Australian secondary schools with teachers, counselors, and principals. The secondary objective was to explore variations in these factors across different school contexts, including the school type (government or nongovernment), location (capital city, regional/or rural areas), and socioeconomic status (SES) (low, medium, high).

METHODS

This quantitative cross-sectional survey study assessed the barriers and facilitators to implementing a hypothetical digital prevention program in Australian schools. The survey was taken by 97 teachers (average age 38.3 years), 93 counselors (average age 39.5 years), and 11 principals (average age 50.9 years) across Australia between November 2017 and July 2018.

RESULTS

A range of barriers and facilitators relating to logistics and resources, staff support, and program factors were endorsed by the surveyed staff. Consistent with prior research, common barriers included a lack of time and resources (ie, staff and rooms). These barriers were particularly evident in government, rural/regional, and low socioeconomic schools. Other barriers were specific to digital delivery, including privacy issues and a lack of clarity around staff roles and responsibilities. Facilitators included upskilling staff through training, embedding the program into the curriculum, and other program factors including universal delivery, screening of students' mental health, and clear referral pathways. Knowledge about the program efficacy was also perceived as important by a large proportion of the respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

The digital depression prevention program was perceived as suitable for use within different schools in Australia, although certain factors need to be considered to enable effective implementation. Logistics and resources, support, and program factors were identified as particularly important for school-based implementation. To maximize the effectiveness in delivering digital programs, implementation may need to be tailored to the staff roles and school types.

摘要

背景

在学校环境中提供的数字预防计划可以使年轻人预防抑郁。然而,对于有助于和阻碍这些计划实施的学校因素知之甚少。工作人员对于在学校中支持心理健康计划至关重要,并且可能对影响实施的因素具有丰富的专业知识和知识。

目的

本研究的主要目的是探讨教师、辅导员和校长在澳大利亚中学实施数字抑郁预防计划的障碍和促进因素。次要目的是探讨这些因素在不同学校背景下的变化,包括学校类型(政府或非政府)、地理位置(首府城市、区域/农村地区)和社会经济地位(SES)(低、中、高)。

方法

这项定量的横断面调查研究评估了在澳大利亚学校实施假设的数字预防计划的障碍和促进因素。2017 年 11 月至 2018 年 7 月,澳大利亚的 97 名教师(平均年龄 38.3 岁)、93 名辅导员(平均年龄 39.5 岁)和 11 名校长(平均年龄 50.9 岁)参与了这项调查。

结果

被调查的工作人员认可了与后勤和资源、员工支持以及计划因素有关的一系列障碍和促进因素。与先前的研究一致,常见的障碍包括缺乏时间和资源(即员工和房间)。这些障碍在政府、农村/地区和低社会经济学校中尤为明显。其他障碍是数字交付特有的,包括隐私问题以及员工角色和职责不明确。促进因素包括通过培训提高员工技能、将计划纳入课程、以及其他计划因素,包括普及交付、筛查学生的心理健康以及明确的转介途径。很大一部分受访者还认为了解该计划的疗效也很重要。

结论

数字抑郁预防计划被认为适合在澳大利亚的不同学校使用,尽管需要考虑某些因素才能实现有效实施。后勤和资源、支持以及计划因素被确定为学校实施的特别重要因素。为了最大限度地提高数字计划的有效性,实施可能需要根据员工角色和学校类型进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3388/8433863/c552c7f9c797/jmir_v23i8e26223_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3388/8433863/c552c7f9c797/jmir_v23i8e26223_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3388/8433863/c552c7f9c797/jmir_v23i8e26223_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors That Help and Hinder the Implementation of Digital Depression Prevention Programs: School-Based Cross-sectional Study.有助于和阻碍数字抑郁预防项目实施的因素:基于学校的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 27;23(8):e26223. doi: 10.2196/26223.
2
Implementing a Digital Depression Prevention Program in Australian Secondary Schools: Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study.在澳大利亚中学实施数字抑郁症预防计划:横断面定性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Jun 12;6:e42349. doi: 10.2196/42349.
3
The equitable reach of a universal, multisector childhood obesity prevention program (Live Life Well @ School) in Australian primary schools.一项全民多部门儿童肥胖预防计划(“在学校健康生活”)在澳大利亚小学的公平覆盖范围。
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Mar 10;30(1):3012003. doi: 10.17061/phrp3012003.
4
Effective implementation of primary school-based healthy lifestyle programmes: a qualitative study of views of school staff.有效实施基于小学的健康生活方式计划:学校工作人员观点的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 9;19(1):1239. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7550-2.
5
Implementation of an Electronic Mental Health Platform for Youth and Young Adults in a School Context Across Alberta, Canada: Thematic Analysis of the Perspectives of Stakeholders.在加拿大艾伯塔省的学校环境中为青年和年轻成年人实施电子心理健康平台:利益相关者观点的主题分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jan 17;11:e49099. doi: 10.2196/49099.
6
Student, teacher, and caregiver perceptions on implementing mental health interventions in Ugandan schools.学生、教师和护理人员对在乌干达学校实施心理健康干预措施的看法。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Jan-Dec;2. doi: 10.1177/26334895211051290. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
7
A cluster randomised trial of an intervention to increase the implementation of physical activity practices in secondary schools: study protocol for scaling up the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) program.一项增加中学开展身体活动实践的干预措施的整群随机试验:扩大身体活动 4 每个人(PA4E1)计划的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):883. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6965-0.
8
Implementation of the Good School Toolkit in Uganda: a quantitative process evaluation of a successful violence prevention program.《乌干达“好学校工具包”的实施:一项成功的预防暴力项目的定量过程评价》。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 9;18(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5462-1.
9
Differences in psychosocial constructs among elementary school staff that implement physical activity programs: a step in designing implementation strategies.在实施体育活动计划的小学教职员工中,心理社会结构的差异:设计实施策略的一步。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):237-242. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab120.
10
Prevalence of current school-level nutrition policies and practices of secondary schools in NSW, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州中学当前校级营养政策及实践的普及率
Health Promot J Austr. 2021 Apr;32(2):216-226. doi: 10.1002/hpja.357. Epub 2020 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights from fifteen years of real-world development, testing and implementation of youth digital mental health interventions.来自十五年青少年数字心理健康干预措施的实际开发、测试和实施的见解。
Internet Interv. 2025 Jun 27;41:100849. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100849. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The evolving field of digital mental health: current evidence and implementation issues for smartphone apps, generative artificial intelligence, and virtual reality.数字心理健康的发展领域:智能手机应用程序、生成式人工智能和虚拟现实的当前证据及实施问题
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):156-174. doi: 10.1002/wps.21299.
3
Usability Testing of a Bystander Bullying Intervention for Rural Middle Schools: Mixed Methods Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol for the process evaluation of a complex intervention delivered in schools to prevent adolescent depression: the Future Proofing Study.学校实施的预防青少年抑郁症复杂干预措施的过程评估方案:未来保障研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):e042133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042133.
2
Mental health provision in schools: priority, facilitators and barriers in 10 European countries.欧洲10国学校的心理健康服务:重点、促进因素与障碍
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2016 Sep;21(3):139-147. doi: 10.1111/camh.12160. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
3
Engaging Children and Young People in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review of Modes of Delivery, Facilitators, and Barriers.
农村中学旁观者欺凌干预的可用性测试:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 21;12:e67962. doi: 10.2196/67962.
4
A randomised controlled implementation trial of the feasibility and effectiveness of school staff delivery of a selective substance use and mental health program during the COVID-19 pandemic.一项关于学校工作人员在新冠疫情期间开展选择性物质使用和心理健康项目的可行性与有效性的随机对照实施试验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21493-1.
5
Refining the Universal, School-Based OurFutures Mental Health Program to Be Trauma Informed, Gender and Sexuality Diversity Affirmative, and Adherent to Proportionate Universalism: Mixed Methods Participatory Design Process.优化基于学校的通用“我们的未来”心理健康项目,使其具备创伤知情、肯定性别与性取向多样性并遵循相称普遍主义:混合方法参与式设计过程。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Aug 21;7:e54637. doi: 10.2196/54637.
6
Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with web-based mental health interventions in young people: a systematic review.青少年参与基于网络的心理健康干预措施的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;34(1):83-100. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02386-x. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
7
Implementing a Digital Depression Prevention Program in Australian Secondary Schools: Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study.在澳大利亚中学实施数字抑郁症预防计划:横断面定性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Jun 12;6:e42349. doi: 10.2196/42349.
8
Streamlined pediatric anxiety program for school mental health services.简化的儿科焦虑计划用于学校心理健康服务。
J Anxiety Disord. 2023 Jan;93:102655. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102655. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
让儿童和青少年参与数字心理健康干预:对提供方式、促进因素和障碍的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e16317. doi: 10.2196/16317.
4
Factors affecting the implementation of a whole school mindfulness program: a qualitative study using the consolidated framework for implementation research.影响全校正念计划实施的因素:使用整合实施研究框架的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 22;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4942-z.
5
Implementation of e-mental health for depression and anxiety: A critical scoping review.电子心理健康在抑郁和焦虑中的应用:一项关键性的范围综述。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Apr;48(3):904-920. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22309. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
6
Streamlined Prevention and Early Intervention for Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial.简化儿童焦虑障碍的预防和早期干预:一项随机对照试验。
Prev Sci. 2020 May;21(4):487-497. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01066-6.
7
A trial protocol for the effectiveness of digital interventions for preventing depression in adolescents: The Future Proofing Study.预防青少年抑郁的数字干预措施效果的试验方案:未来证明研究。
Trials. 2020 Jan 2;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3901-7.
8
Smooth Sailing: A Pilot Study of an Online, School-Based, Mental Health Service for Depression and Anxiety.一帆风顺:一项针对抑郁症和焦虑症的在线学校心理健康服务的试点研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 20;10:574. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00574. eCollection 2019.
9
Mindfulness Training in UK Secondary Schools: a Multiple Case Study Approach to Identification of Cornerstones of Implementation.英国中学的正念训练:一种识别实施基石的多案例研究方法
Mindfulness (N Y). 2019 Jun 4;10(2):376-389. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-0982-4. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
10
Burnout among school teachers: quantitative and qualitative results from a follow-up study in southern Sweden.学校教师的倦怠:来自瑞典南部一项随访研究的定量和定性结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 29;19(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6972-1.