Nunez-Badinez Paulina, De Leo Bianca, Laux-Biehlmann Alexis, Hoffmann Anja, Zollner Thomas M, Saunders Philippa T K, Simitsidellis Ioannis, Charrua Ana, Cruz Francisco, Gomez Raul, Tejada Miguel Angel, McMahon Stephen B, Lo Re Laure, Barthas Florent, Vincent Katy, Birch Judy, Meijlink Jane, Hummelshoj Lone, Sweeney Patrick J, Armstrong J Douglas, Treede Rolf-Detlef, Nagel Jens
Bayer AG, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany.
Centre for Inflammation Research, The University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Pain. 2021 Sep 1;162(9):2349-2365. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002248.
Endometriosis (ENDO) and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) are chronic pain conditions for which better treatments are urgently needed. Development of new therapies with proven clinical benefit has been slow. We have conducted a review of existing preclinical in vivo models for ENDO and IC/BPS in rodents, discussed to what extent they replicate the phenotype and pain experience of patients, as well as their relevance for translational research. In 1009 publications detailing ENDO models, 41% used autologous, 26% syngeneic, 18% xenograft, and 11% allogeneic tissue in transplantation models. Intraperitoneal injection of endometrial tissue was the subcategory with the highest construct validity score for translational research. From 1055 IC/BPS publications, most interventions were bladder centric (85%), followed by complex mechanisms (8%) and stress-induced models (7%). Within these categories, the most frequently used models were instillation of irritants (92%), autoimmune (43%), and water avoidance stress (39%), respectively. Notably, although pelvic pain is a hallmark of both conditions and a key endpoint for development of novel therapies, only a small proportion of the studies (models of ENDO: 0.5%-12% and models of IC/BPS: 20%-44%) examined endpoints associated with pain. Moreover, only 2% and 3% of publications using models of ENDO and IC/BPS investigated nonevoked pain endpoints. This analysis highlights the wide variety of models used, limiting reproducibility and translation of results. We recommend refining models so that they better reflect clinical reality, sharing protocols, and using standardized endpoints to improve reproducibility. We are addressing this in our project Innovative Medicines Initiative-PainCare/Translational Research in Pelvic Pain.
子宫内膜异位症(ENDO)和间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征(IC/BPS)是慢性疼痛病症,迫切需要更好的治疗方法。具有已证实临床益处的新疗法开发进展缓慢。我们对啮齿动物中现有的ENDO和IC/BPS临床前体内模型进行了综述,讨论了它们在多大程度上复制了患者的表型和疼痛体验,以及它们与转化研究的相关性。在1009篇详细描述ENDO模型的出版物中,41%在移植模型中使用自体组织,26%使用同基因组织,18%使用异种移植组织,11%使用同种异体组织。腹腔内注射子宫内膜组织是转化研究中构建效度得分最高的子类别。在1055篇IC/BPS出版物中,大多数干预措施以膀胱为中心(85%),其次是复杂机制(8%)和应激诱导模型(7%)。在这些类别中,最常用的模型分别是刺激性物质灌注(92%)、自身免疫(43%)和水回避应激(39%)。值得注意的是,尽管盆腔疼痛是这两种病症的标志以及新疗法开发的关键终点,但只有一小部分研究(ENDO模型:0.5%-12%,IC/BPS模型:20%-44%)检查了与疼痛相关的终点。此外,使用ENDO和IC/BPS模型的出版物中分别只有2%和3%研究了非诱发性疼痛终点。该分析突出了所使用模型的多样性,限制了结果的可重复性和转化。我们建议优化模型,使其更好地反映临床实际情况,共享方案,并使用标准化终点来提高可重复性。我们正在我们的创新药物计划-疼痛关怀/盆腔疼痛转化研究项目中解决这一问题。