• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏手术后住院期间连续心电图监测对未诊断心房颤动检出率的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of Continuous Electrocardiogram Monitoring on Detection of Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation After Hospitalization for Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Cardiac Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121867. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21867.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21867
PMID:34448866
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8397929/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurring after cardiac surgery is associated with adverse outcomes. Whether POAF persists beyond discharge is not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring enhances detection of POAF among cardiac surgical patients during the first 30 days after hospital discharge compared with usual care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted at 10 Canadian centers. Enrollment spanned from March 2017 to March 2020, with follow-up through September 11, 2020. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment stopped on July 17, 2020, at which point 85% of the proposed sample size was enrolled. Cardiac surgical patients with CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, female sex) score greater than or equal to 4 or greater than or equal to 2 with risk factors for POAF, no history of preoperative AF, and POAF lasting less than 24 hours during hospitalization were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention group underwent continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring with wearable, patch-based monitors for 30 days after randomization. Monitoring was not mandated in the usual care group within 30 days after randomization.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was cumulative AF and/or atrial flutter lasting 6 minutes or longer detected by continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring or by a 12-lead electrocardiogram within 30 days of randomization. Prespecified secondary outcomes included cumulative AF lasting 6 hours or longer and 24 hours or longer within 30 days of randomization, death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, non-central nervous system thromboembolism, major bleeding, and oral anticoagulation prescription.

RESULTS

Of the 336 patients randomized (163 patients in the intervention group and 173 patients in the usual care group; mean [SD] age, 67.4 [8.1] years; 73 women [21.7%]; median [interquartile range] CHA2DS2-VASc score, 4.0 [3.0-4.0] points), 307 (91.4%) completed the trial. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the primary end point occurred in 32 patients (19.6%) in the intervention group vs 3 patients (1.7%) in the usual care group (absolute difference, 17.9%; 95% CI, 11.5%-24.3%; P < .001). AF lasting 6 hours or longer was detected in 14 patients (8.6%) in the intervention group vs 0 patients in the usual care group (absolute difference, 8.6%; 95% CI, 4.3%-12.9%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In post-cardiac surgical patients at high risk of stroke, no preoperative AF history, and AF lasting less than 24 hours during hospitalization, continuous monitoring revealed a significant increase in the rate of POAF after discharge that would otherwise not be detected by usual care. Studies are needed to examine whether these patients will benefit from oral anticoagulation therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02793895.

摘要

重要性

心脏手术后发生的房性心动过速(POAF)与不良结局相关。POAF 是否在出院后持续存在尚不清楚。

目的

确定与常规护理相比,在出院后 30 天内,连续心脏节律监测是否能提高心脏手术后患者 POAF 的检出率。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项由研究者发起的、开放性、多中心、随机临床试验,在加拿大的 10 个中心进行。招募工作从 2017 年 3 月持续到 2020 年 3 月,随访至 2020 年 9 月 11 日。由于 COVID-19 大流行,招募工作于 2020 年 7 月 17 日停止,此时已经招募了计划样本量的 85%。CHA2DS2-VASc(充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄≥75 岁、糖尿病、既往卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作、血管疾病、年龄 65-74 岁、女性)评分大于等于 4 分或大于等于 2 分且有 POAF 风险因素、无术前 AF 病史和住院期间 POAF 持续时间小于 24 小时的心脏手术患者被纳入研究。

干预措施

干预组在随机分组后 30 天内接受连续心脏节律监测,使用可穿戴、贴片式监测器。在随机分组后 30 天内,常规护理组不强制进行监测。

主要观察指标

主要结局是在随机分组后 30 天内通过连续心脏节律监测或 12 导联心电图检测到的持续 6 分钟或更长时间的 AF 和/或心房扑动。预设的次要结局包括随机分组后 30 天内持续 6 小时或更长时间和 24 小时或更长时间的 AF、死亡、心肌梗死、缺血性卒中和非中枢神经系统血栓栓塞、大出血和口服抗凝药物处方。

结果

在随机分组的 336 例患者中(干预组 163 例,常规护理组 173 例;平均[标准差]年龄 67.4[8.1]岁;73 名女性[21.7%];中位数[四分位间距]CHA2DS2-VASc 评分 4.0[3.0-4.0]分),307 例(91.4%)完成了试验。在意向治疗分析中,主要终点在干预组的 32 例患者(19.6%)和常规护理组的 3 例患者(1.7%)中发生(绝对差异,17.9%;95%置信区间,11.5%-24.3%;P<0.001)。在干预组的 14 例患者(8.6%)中检测到持续 6 小时或更长时间的 AF,而常规护理组的 0 例患者中未检测到(绝对差异,8.6%;95%置信区间,4.3%-12.9%;P<0.001)。

结论和相关性

在心脏手术后有中风高风险、无术前 AF 病史和住院期间 AF 持续时间小于 24 小时的患者中,连续监测显示 POAF 的发生率显著增加,而常规护理则无法检测到。需要研究这些患者是否会受益于口服抗凝治疗。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02793895。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc3/8397929/fb150aa2593e/jamanetwopen-e2121867-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc3/8397929/40c1e9af163c/jamanetwopen-e2121867-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc3/8397929/8b642055d8e4/jamanetwopen-e2121867-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc3/8397929/fb150aa2593e/jamanetwopen-e2121867-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc3/8397929/40c1e9af163c/jamanetwopen-e2121867-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc3/8397929/8b642055d8e4/jamanetwopen-e2121867-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecc3/8397929/fb150aa2593e/jamanetwopen-e2121867-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Continuous Electrocardiogram Monitoring on Detection of Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation After Hospitalization for Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.心脏手术后住院期间连续心电图监测对未诊断心房颤动检出率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121867. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21867.
2
Effect of Implantable vs Prolonged External Electrocardiographic Monitoring on Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Patients With Ischemic Stroke: The PER DIEM Randomized Clinical Trial.植入式与延长外部心电图监测对缺血性脑卒中患者心房颤动检测的影响:PER DIEM 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2160-2168. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6128.
3
Effect of Long-term Continuous Cardiac Monitoring vs Usual Care on Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Stroke Attributed to Large- or Small-Vessel Disease: The STROKE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.长期连续心脏监测与常规护理对大血管或小血管病变引起的卒中患者心房颤动检出率的影响:STROKE-AF 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2169-2177. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6470.
4
Effect of a Home-Based Wearable Continuous ECG Monitoring Patch on Detection of Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation: The mSToPS Randomized Clinical Trial.基于家庭的可穿戴连续心电图监测贴片对无症状心房颤动检测的影响:mSToPS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 10;320(2):146-155. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8102.
5
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in the Older Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.老年人群心房颤动筛查:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 May 1;6(5):558-567. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0038.
6
Wearable Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring Device for Detection of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.可穿戴式心脏节律监测设备用于检测术后心房颤动。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Oct;116(4):854-858. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.06.027. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
7
Effect of Mailing Educational Material to Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Their Clinicians on Use of Oral Anticoagulants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.邮寄教育材料给房颤患者及其临床医生对口服抗凝药物使用的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14321.
8
Self-monitoring for atrial fibrillation recurrence in the discharge period post-cardiac surgery using an iPhone electrocardiogram.使用苹果手机心电图对心脏手术后出院期房颤复发进行自我监测。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jul;50(1):44-51. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv486. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients discharged in sinus rhythm after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏手术后窦性心律出院患者术后房颤复发的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar 1;26(3):504-511. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx348.
10
Association of Atrial Fibrillation Episode Duration With Arrhythmia Recurrence Following Ablation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.心房颤动发作持续时间与消融后心律失常复发的关系:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e208748. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8748.

引用本文的文献

1
Anticoagulation and thromboembolic risk in critically ill patients with trigger-induced atrial fibrillation-A systematic review and meta-analysis.触发诱导型房颤危重症患者的抗凝与血栓栓塞风险——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Neth Heart J. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s12471-025-01978-9.
2
Integration of Left Atrial Function Assessment, Genetic Risk, and Clinical Risk Factors Improves Prediction of Incident Atrial Fibrillation.左心房功能评估、遗传风险和临床风险因素的整合可改善对新发心房颤动的预测。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e037145. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037145. Epub 2025 May 13.
3
Wearables research for continuous monitoring of patient outcomes: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
New-onset atrial fibrillation and outcomes following isolated coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.孤立性冠状动脉旁路移植术后新发心房颤动与结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Sep;43(9):928-934. doi: 10.1002/clc.23414. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
2
Initial Precipitants and Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation.初始诱发因素与心房颤动的复发。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;13(3):e007716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007716. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
Compared with matched controls, patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) have increased long-term AF after CABG, and POAF is further associated with increased ischemic stroke, heart failure and mortality even after adjustment for AF.
用于持续监测患者预后的可穿戴设备研究:一项范围综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 9;4(5):e0000860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000860. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Physiologic and Behavioral Monitoring With Digital Sensors for Cerebrovascular Disease: A Scoping Review.用于脑血管疾病的数字传感器的生理和行为监测:一项范围综述。
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Apr 25;1(2):139-160. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.03.007. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Improving atrial fibrillation or flutter detection and management by smartphone-based photoplethysmography rhythm monitoring following cardiac surgery: a pragmatic randomized trial.通过基于智能手机的光电容积脉搏波描记术节律监测改善心脏手术后房颤或房扑的检测与管理:一项实用随机试验
Europace. 2025 Feb 5;27(2). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf015.
6
The Effect of Silymarin on the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.水飞蓟素对冠状动脉旁路移植术后预防心房颤动的影响。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Nov 28;e20230422(e20230422):e20230422. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0422.
7
A Comprehensive Review on Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR): Pioneering a New Era in Arrhythmia Management.立体定向心律失常射频消融术(STAR)综合综述:开创心律失常管理新时代
Cureus. 2024 Oct 1;16(10):e70601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70601. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation: A Review.术后心房颤动:综述
Biomedicines. 2024 Sep 1;12(9):1968. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12091968.
9
Role of anticoagulation therapy in modifying stroke risk associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation after non-cardiac surgery.抗凝治疗在改变非心脏手术后新发心房颤动相关卒中风险中的作用。
Nat Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):3310-3317. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03206-0. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
10
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery: clinical practice review.心脏手术后的术后心房颤动(POAF):临床实践综述
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Feb 29;16(2):1503-1520. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1626. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
与匹配对照相比,行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后的患者发生术后心房颤动(POAF)与 CABG 后长期 AF 增加相关,即使在调整 AF 后,POAF 也与缺血性卒中和心力衰竭以及死亡率增加相关。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Oct;109(10):1232-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01614-z. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
4
Postoperative and Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation-Not So Different After All.术后房颤与非瓣膜性房颤——终究并非如此不同。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;4(11):1147-1148. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3826.
5
Stroke Risk as a Function of Atrial Fibrillation Duration and CHADS-VASc Score.房颤持续时间和 CHADS-VASc 评分与卒中风险的关系。
Circulation. 2019 Nov 12;140(20):1639-1646. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041303. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
CHADS-VASc Score for Identifying Patients at High Risk of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis.心脏手术后识别术后心房颤动高危患者的 CHADS-VASc 评分:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Apr;109(4):1210-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.084. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
7
Preoperative predictors of new-onset prolonged atrial fibrillation after surgical aortic valve replacement.外科主动脉瓣置换术后新发持续性心房颤动的术前预测因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;159(4):1407-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.077. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
Perioperative/Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Subsequent Stroke and/or Mortality.围手术期/术后心房颤动与随后发生中风和/或死亡的风险。
Stroke. 2019 Jun;50(6):1364-1371. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023921. Epub 2019 May 2.
9
Long Term Risk of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke after Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Surgeries.心脏手术和非心脏手术合并术后房颤后复发性房颤和缺血性卒中的长期风险
J Atr Fibrillation. 2018 Apr 30;10(6):1660. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1660. eCollection 2018 Apr.
10
Long-term Thromboembolic Risk in Patients With Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.冠状动脉旁路移植术后合并心房颤动与非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的长期血栓栓塞风险。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 May 1;3(5):417-424. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0405.