Gastroenterology and Liver Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e051053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051053.
This systematic review aims to investigate what is currently known about the characteristics of interactions between patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and their clinicians and its effect on patient outcomes.
Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Communication Abstracts, Health & Society, Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts and PsycINFO were systematically searched from inception to June 2021.
Peer-reviewed journal articles and book chapters in English investigating the characteristics of naturally occurring interactions between clinicians that manage IBD and patients with IBD during recorded consultations were included.
Risk of bias was assessed using a specifically developed quality assessment tool, grounded in linguistic theory and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis guided by the linguistic concept of metafunction was performed to synthesise the findings.
Of the 2883 abstracts reviewed five formed the basis of the review. Interactions between IBD nurses and patients have been mostly characterised in terms of information provision regarding prescribed medications without consideration of the interpersonal aspect. Discussing online medical information with nurses has been shown to improve patient satisfaction. Analyses of gastroenterologist-patient interactions have concentrated on the clinical relationship which has been shown to be disease-centred. Shared decision making in ulcerative colitis has been shown to be compromised due to lack of transparency regarding treatment goals.
This review did not include articles in languages other than English. Cumulative evidence could not be produced due to the small number of included studies and the diversity of contexts, theories and data types.
There is a paucity of systematic research on naturally occurring clinical communication in IBD and its effect on outcomes. Further research needs to be done to address this knowledge gap.
CRD42020169657.
本系统评价旨在调查目前已知的炎症性肠病 (IBD) 患者与临床医生之间互动的特征及其对患者结局的影响。
从建库到 2021 年 6 月,系统检索了 Scopus、PubMed、Embase、Communication Abstracts、Health & Society、Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts 和 PsycINFO 数据库。
纳入了以英文发表的同行评议期刊文章和书章节,调查了在记录的会诊期间,管理 IBD 的临床医生与 IBD 患者之间自然发生的互动特征。
使用专门开发的质量评估工具评估偏倚风险,该工具基于语言理论和混合方法评估工具。采用基于语言元功能概念的叙述性综合方法对结果进行综合。
在审查的 2883 篇摘要中,有 5 篇构成了本综述的基础。IBD 护士与患者之间的互动主要以提供关于规定药物的信息为特征,而没有考虑人际方面。与护士讨论在线医疗信息已被证明可以提高患者满意度。对胃肠病学家-患者互动的分析集中在已显示以疾病为中心的临床关系上。溃疡性结肠炎的共同决策因缺乏关于治疗目标的透明度而受到损害。
本综述未包括英语以外语言的文章。由于纳入研究数量少,以及背景、理论和数据类型的多样性,无法产生累积证据。
在 IBD 中,自然发生的临床沟通及其对结局的影响的系统研究很少。需要进一步研究以解决这一知识空白。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020169657。