Suppr超能文献

炎症性肠病的临床沟通:系统综述临床医生-患者对话的研究,以指导研究和实践。

Clinical communication in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of the study of clinician-patient dialogue to inform research and practice.

机构信息

Gastroenterology and Liver Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e051053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051053.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to investigate what is currently known about the characteristics of interactions between patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and their clinicians and its effect on patient outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Communication Abstracts, Health & Society, Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts and PsycINFO were systematically searched from inception to June 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Peer-reviewed journal articles and book chapters in English investigating the characteristics of naturally occurring interactions between clinicians that manage IBD and patients with IBD during recorded consultations were included.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Risk of bias was assessed using a specifically developed quality assessment tool, grounded in linguistic theory and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis guided by the linguistic concept of metafunction was performed to synthesise the findings.

RESULTS

Of the 2883 abstracts reviewed five formed the basis of the review. Interactions between IBD nurses and patients have been mostly characterised in terms of information provision regarding prescribed medications without consideration of the interpersonal aspect. Discussing online medical information with nurses has been shown to improve patient satisfaction. Analyses of gastroenterologist-patient interactions have concentrated on the clinical relationship which has been shown to be disease-centred. Shared decision making in ulcerative colitis has been shown to be compromised due to lack of transparency regarding treatment goals.

LIMITATIONS

This review did not include articles in languages other than English. Cumulative evidence could not be produced due to the small number of included studies and the diversity of contexts, theories and data types.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

There is a paucity of systematic research on naturally occurring clinical communication in IBD and its effect on outcomes. Further research needs to be done to address this knowledge gap.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020169657.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在调查目前已知的炎症性肠病 (IBD) 患者与临床医生之间互动的特征及其对患者结局的影响。

数据来源

从建库到 2021 年 6 月,系统检索了 Scopus、PubMed、Embase、Communication Abstracts、Health & Society、Linguistics and Language Behaviour Abstracts 和 PsycINFO 数据库。

研究入选标准

纳入了以英文发表的同行评议期刊文章和书章节,调查了在记录的会诊期间,管理 IBD 的临床医生与 IBD 患者之间自然发生的互动特征。

研究评估和综合方法

使用专门开发的质量评估工具评估偏倚风险,该工具基于语言理论和混合方法评估工具。采用基于语言元功能概念的叙述性综合方法对结果进行综合。

结果

在审查的 2883 篇摘要中,有 5 篇构成了本综述的基础。IBD 护士与患者之间的互动主要以提供关于规定药物的信息为特征,而没有考虑人际方面。与护士讨论在线医疗信息已被证明可以提高患者满意度。对胃肠病学家-患者互动的分析集中在已显示以疾病为中心的临床关系上。溃疡性结肠炎的共同决策因缺乏关于治疗目标的透明度而受到损害。

局限性

本综述未包括英语以外语言的文章。由于纳入研究数量少,以及背景、理论和数据类型的多样性,无法产生累积证据。

结论和关键发现的意义

在 IBD 中,自然发生的临床沟通及其对结局的影响的系统研究很少。需要进一步研究以解决这一知识空白。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020169657。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48b9/8404434/35cb1fa87e70/bmjopen-2021-051053f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验