• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

炎症性肠病的临床沟通:系统文献回顾方案。

Clinical communication in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review protocol.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Gastroenterology Research Group, The Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 4;10(11):e039503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039503.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039503
PMID:33148752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7643514/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Evidence regarding effective communication between clinicians and patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is limited. Studies that investigate clinical communication in IBD are much fewer in number than studies that investigate the perceptions of patients and clinicians about communication in clinical encounters. The current review aims to identify, organise and summarise systematically what is currently known about (1) the characteristics of interactions between clinicians who manage IBD and patients with IBD, and (2) how clinical discussion affects health outcomes in IBD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Communication Abstracts, Health & Society, Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts and PsycINFO will be systematically searched for studies that investigate the characteristics of IBD clinical interactions during recorded consultations, from earliest available dates within each database to May 2020. A specifically developed quality assessment tool, grounded in linguistic theory, will be used to critically assess the evidence. In addition, a data extraction template will be developed and utilised to provide a description of the characteristics of IBD clinical communication as well as an estimation of its effect on health outcomes in a narrative synthesis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical review and approval is not required for this systematic review as no primary data will be collected. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 28 April 2020 (registration number: CRD42020169657).

摘要

简介

有关临床医生与炎症性肠病(IBD)患者之间有效沟通的证据有限。研究 IBD 临床沟通的数量远少于研究患者和临床医生对临床交流中沟通的看法。本综述旨在系统地确定、组织和总结以下方面的知识:(1)管理 IBD 的临床医生与 IBD 患者之间互动的特征;(2)临床讨论如何影响 IBD 的健康结果。

方法和分析

将从每个数据库最早可用日期至 2020 年 5 月,系统地在 Scopus、PubMed、Embase、Communication Abstracts、Health & Society、Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts 和 PsycINFO 中搜索调查记录咨询期间 IBD 临床互动特征的研究。将使用基于语言学理论的专门开发的质量评估工具对证据进行严格评估。此外,将开发并利用数据提取模板,以叙述性综合的方式描述 IBD 临床沟通的特征,并估计其对健康结果的影响。

伦理与传播

由于不收集原始数据,因此本系统评价不需要伦理审查和批准。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在学术会议上展示。

国际前瞻性注册系统评价(PROSPERO)注册日期:2020 年 4 月 28 日(注册编号:CRD42020169657)。

相似文献

1
Clinical communication in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review protocol.炎症性肠病的临床沟通:系统文献回顾方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 4;10(11):e039503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039503.
2
Clinical communication in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of the study of clinician-patient dialogue to inform research and practice.炎症性肠病的临床沟通:系统综述临床医生-患者对话的研究,以指导研究和实践。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e051053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051053.
3
Umbrella review of risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease: a study protocol.伞式综述炎症性肠病风险因素:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e077267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077267.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Effects of low-FODMAP diet on irritable bowel symptoms in patients with quiescent inflammatory bowel disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.低 FODMAP 饮食对缓解期炎症性肠病患者肠易激症状的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 18;101(11). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029088.
6
Acupuncture for emotional disorders in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review protocol.针刺治疗炎症性肠病患者情绪障碍的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 27;12(9):e058568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058568.
7
Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol.识别对初级保健执业护士实践敏感的指标:系统评价方案综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043213.
8
Prevalence of neck pain and its associated factors in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.非洲颈痛的患病率及其相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 18;13(9):e074219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074219.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Study protocol epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review.研究方案:儿童和青少年炎症性肠病的流行病学:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 28;10(12):e037669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037669.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the Perspectives and Experiences of Patients with Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Hospital: A Qualitative Analysis.了解急性重度溃疡性结肠炎患者在医院的观点和体验:定性分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Oct;69(10):3690-3700. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08633-0. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Health Communication Research Informs Inflammatory Bowel Disease Practice and Research: A Narrative Review.健康传播研究为炎症性肠病的实践与研究提供信息:一项叙述性综述。
Crohns Colitis 360. 2023 Apr 21;5(3):otad021. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otad021. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Clinical communication in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of the study of clinician-patient dialogue to inform research and practice.炎症性肠病的临床沟通:系统综述临床医生-患者对话的研究,以指导研究和实践。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e051053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051053.

本文引用的文献

1
Linguistic and interactional aspects that characterize consultations about medically unexplained symptoms: A systematic review.以语言和互动为特点的、针对无法用医学解释的症状的咨询:系统综述。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 May;132:109994. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109994. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
2
The cost of not addressing the communication barriers faced by hospitalized patients.不解决住院患者所面临的沟通障碍的代价。
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2018 Jan;3(12):99-112. doi: 10.1044/persp3.SIG12.99.
3
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.系列:定性研究实用指南。第 4 部分:可信性和出版。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
4
The mediatory role of medication adherence in improving patients' medication experience through patient-physician communication among older hypertensive patients.在老年高血压患者中,药物依从性通过医患沟通在改善患者用药体验方面的中介作用。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Jul 5;11:1119-1126. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S137263. eCollection 2017.
5
Everyday conversation in dementia: a review of the literature to inform research and practice.痴呆症患者的日常对话:文献综述以指导研究与实践
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):392-406. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12298. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
6
Uncertain Diagnostic Language Affects Further Studies, Endoscopies, and Repeat Consultations for Patients With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.不确定的诊断性语言会影响功能性胃肠病患者的进一步研究、内镜检查和重复会诊。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;14(12):1735-1741.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.06.030. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
7
Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations.医疗保健中的沟通:文献综述与实用建议
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Nov;69(11):1257-67. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12686. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
8
Gastroenterologists' Views of Shared Decision Making for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.胃肠病学家对炎症性肠病患者共同决策的看法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Sep;60(9):2636-45. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3675-z. Epub 2015 May 5.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.