Schmidt Tina, Klemis Verena, Schub David, Schneitler Sophie, Reichert Matthias C, Wilkens Heinrike, Sester Urban, Sester Martina, Mihm Janine
Department of Transplant and Infection Immunology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Am J Transplant. 2021 Dec;21(12):3990-4002. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16818. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
Knowledge on the immunogenicity of vector-based and mRNA-vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients is limited. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells and antibodies were analyzed in 40 transplant recipients and 70 controls after homologous or heterologous vaccine-regimens. Plasmablasts and SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells were quantified using flow cytometry. Specific antibodies were analyzed by ELISA and neutralization assay. The two vaccine types differed after the first vaccination, as IgG and neutralizing activity were more pronounced after mRNA priming (p = .0001 each), whereas CD4 and CD8 T cell levels were higher after vector priming (p = .009; p = .0001). All regimens were well tolerated, and SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and/or T cells after second vaccination were induced in 100% of controls and 70.6% of transplant recipients. Although antibody and T cell levels were lower in patients, heterologous vaccination led to the most pronounced induction of antibodies and CD4 T cells. Plasmablast numbers were significantly higher in controls and correlated with SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG- and T cell levels. While antibodies were only detected in 35.3% of patients, cellular immunity was more frequently found (64.7%) indicating that assessment of antibodies is insufficient to identify COVID-19-vaccine responders. In conclusion, heterologous vaccination seems promising in transplant recipients, and combined analysis of humoral and cellular immunity improves the identification of responders among immunocompromised individuals.
实体器官移植受者中基于载体和mRNA疫苗的免疫原性相关知识有限。因此,在40名移植受者和70名对照者接受同源或异源疫苗接种方案后,对其SARS-CoV-2特异性T细胞和抗体进行了分析。使用流式细胞术对浆母细胞以及SARS-CoV-2特异性CD4和CD8 T细胞进行定量。通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和中和试验分析特异性抗体。两种疫苗在首次接种后表现不同,mRNA启动后IgG和中和活性更为显著(每项p = 0.0001),而载体启动后CD4和CD8 T细胞水平更高(p = 0.009;p = 0.0001)。所有接种方案耐受性良好,第二次接种后,100%的对照者和70.6%的移植受者诱导产生了SARS-CoV-2特异性抗体和/或T细胞。尽管患者的抗体和T细胞水平较低,但异源接种导致抗体和CD4 T细胞的诱导最为显著。对照者的浆母细胞数量显著更高,且与SARS-CoV-2特异性IgG和T细胞水平相关。虽然仅在35.3%的患者中检测到抗体,但细胞免疫的检出频率更高(64.7%),这表明仅评估抗体不足以识别COVID-19疫苗应答者。总之,异源接种在移植受者中似乎很有前景,对体液免疫和细胞免疫进行联合分析可改善免疫功能低下个体中应答者的识别。