Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Unit for Physiotherapy Services, Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06914-2.
The organisation of health care services for older adults varies within and between countries. In Norway, primary care physiotherapy services offer home-based rehabilitation to older adults. The aim of this study was to compare patients' characteristics and treatment outcomes in three working models of home-based rehabilitation.
Patients referred to home-based rehabilitation in a large municipality in Norway were invited to participate in this prospective observational study. The three working models, early intervention, reablement and regular physiotherapy, were organised according to the patients' function and degree of independence. The older adults (≥ 65 years) were allocated to the different models by either a multidisciplinary group of health care personnel or by direct referral. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, including physical function (Patient-specific functional scale, PSFS), physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery, SPPB) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) were registered at baseline and follow-up (maximum 6 months after baseline). One-way ANOVA was used to analyse group differences in clinical characteristics and paired t-tests to analyse changes from baseline to follow-up.
In total, 603 and 402 patients (median (interquartile range) age: 84 (77-88) years) completed baseline and follow-up assessments, respectively. Patients in all three working models had an increased risk for functional decline. Patients receiving early intervention (n = 62) had significantly (p < 0.001) better physical performance and health-related quality of life (SPPB mean 7.9, SD 2.7; EQ-5D:mean 0.59, SD 0.19), than patients receiving reablement (n = 132) (SPPB: mean 5.5, SD 2.6; EQ-5D: mean 0.50, SD 0.15) and regular physiotherapy (n = 409) (SPPB: mean 5.6, SD 2.8; EQ-5D: mean 0.41, SD 0.22). At follow-up, the three working models showed significantly improvements in physical function (PSFS: mean change (95 % CI): 2.5 (1.9 to 3.2); 1.8 (0.5 to 3.1); 1.7 (0.8 to 2.6), for regular physiotherapy, reablement, and early intervention, respectively). Patients receiving regular physiotherapy and reablement also significantly improved physical performance and health-related quality of life.
While older adults receiving reablement and regular physiotherapy showed similar patient characteristics and treatment outcomes, early intervention identified older patients at risk of functional decline at an earlier stage. These results are relevant for policy makers when designing and improving prevention and rehabilitation strategies in primary health care.
老年人医疗服务的组织形式在国家内部和国家之间存在差异。在挪威,基础医疗物理治疗服务为老年人提供上门康复服务。本研究旨在比较三种上门康复工作模式中患者的特征和治疗结果。
邀请在挪威一个大城市接受上门康复治疗的患者参与这项前瞻性观察研究。三种工作模式,早期干预、再适应和常规物理治疗,是根据患者的功能和独立程度组织的。通过多学科医疗保健人员小组或直接转介,将老年人(≥65 岁)分配到不同的模式中。患者的人口统计学和临床特征,包括身体功能(特定于患者的功能量表,PSFS)、身体表现(简短身体表现电池,SPPB)和健康相关的生活质量(EQ-5D)在基线和随访时(最大为基线后 6 个月)登记。使用单因素方差分析分析临床特征的组间差异,使用配对 t 检验分析从基线到随访的变化。
共有 603 名和 402 名患者(中位数(四分位距)年龄:84(77-88)岁)分别完成了基线和随访评估。所有三种工作模式的患者都有功能下降的风险。接受早期干预(n=62)的患者在身体表现和健康相关的生活质量方面有显著(p<0.001)的改善(SPPB 平均 7.9,SD 2.7;EQ-5D:平均 0.59,SD 0.19),而接受再适应(n=132)(SPPB:平均 5.5,SD 2.6;EQ-5D:平均 0.50,SD 0.15)和常规物理治疗(n=409)(SPPB:平均 5.6,SD 2.8;EQ-5D:平均 0.41,SD 0.22)的患者。在随访时,三种工作模式的身体功能均有显著改善(PSFS:平均变化(95%CI):2.5(1.9 至 3.2);1.8(0.5 至 3.1);1.7(0.8 至 2.6),分别用于常规物理治疗、再适应和早期干预)。接受常规物理治疗和再适应治疗的患者的身体表现和健康相关的生活质量也有显著改善。
虽然接受再适应和常规物理治疗的老年人具有相似的患者特征和治疗结果,但早期干预更早地识别出有功能下降风险的老年人。这些结果对政策制定者在设计和改进初级卫生保健中的预防和康复策略时具有重要意义。