• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮下输液港为何会发生堵塞?一项病例对照研究。

Why do subcutaneous ports get stuck? A case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place Mail Stop 133, Memphis, TN 38105, USA; College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Sep;57(9):229-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.08.003
PMID:34456040
Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to identify clinical features associated with difficult subcutaneous port removals in children.

METHODS

Ports placed between April 2014 and September 2017 at our institution were prospectively tracked for difficult removals. A case-control analysis was performed. Patients with ports that were difficult to remove (stuck; cases) were compared to biological sex and age-matched controls in a ratio of 1:3. Logistic regression determined the association between case/control status and clinical features adjusting for biological sex and age as covariates. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent associations.

RESULTS

57 stuck ports (28 extreme [10 endovascular intervention] and 29 moderate) and 171 controls were analyzed. Stuck ports were associated with a diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (86% cases versus 22.2% controls; p < 0.001) and a longer placement duration (median 2.6 years [interquartile range (IQR) 2.5-2.6] versus 0.8 years [IQR 0.5-1.4]; p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, procedural and device features associated with stuck ports included subclavian access (71.9% cases versus 48.5% controls; p = 0.0126), a polyurethane versus silicone catheter (96.5% cases versus 79.9% controls; p = 0.001), and a rough catheter appearance at removal (92.6% cases versus 9.4% controls; p < 0.0001). A diagnosis of ALL and duration of line placement were associated with having a stuck port on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Polyurethane central venous catheters placed for the two-year treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia may become difficult to remove. This constellation of factors warrants more extensive preoperative discussion of risk, endovascular backup availability, and scheduling for longer operating room time.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定与儿童皮下置管取出困难相关的临床特征。

方法

本研究前瞻性地跟踪了 2014 年 4 月至 2017 年 9 月期间在我院植入的置管情况,以确定其取出困难的病例。将取出困难的置管(卡滞;病例)与生物性别和年龄相匹配的 3 倍对照进行病例对照分析。使用逻辑回归确定病例/对照状态与临床特征之间的关联,调整生物性别和年龄作为协变量。进行多变量分析以确定独立的关联。

结果

共分析了 57 个卡滞的置管(28 个极端[10 个血管内介入]和 29 个中度)和 171 个对照。卡滞的置管与急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的诊断(86%病例与 22.2%对照;p<0.001)和更长的置管时间(中位数 2.6 年[四分位距(IQR)2.5-2.6]与 0.8 年[IQR 0.5-1.4];p<0.001)相关。在单变量分析中,与卡滞置管相关的操作和设备特征包括锁骨下入路(71.9%病例与 48.5%对照;p=0.0126)、聚亚安酯与硅胶导管(96.5%病例与 79.9%对照;p=0.001)和取出时导管外观粗糙(92.6%病例与 9.4%对照;p<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,ALL 的诊断和置管时间与卡滞置管相关。

结论

用于治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病两年的聚亚安酯中心静脉导管可能难以取出。这种因素组合需要更广泛地讨论风险、血管内介入的备用情况,并为更长的手术室时间做好安排。

相似文献

1
Why do subcutaneous ports get stuck? A case-control study.皮下输液港为何会发生堵塞?一项病例对照研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Sep;57(9):229-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
2
IR Approaches to Difficult Removals of Totally Implanted Venous Access Port Catheters in Children: A Single-Center Experience.儿童完全植入式静脉输液港导管困难拔除的介入放射学方法:单中心经验
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):876-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
3
Stuck fragment of totally implantable central venous access ports during removal: risk factor analysis in children.完全植入式中心静脉通路港取出时的滞留碎片:儿童的风险因素分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01271-7.
4
Stuck tunneled central venous catheters in children: Four cases removed by angiography assistance.儿童隧道式中心静脉导管堵塞:4例经血管造影辅助取出
Turk J Pediatr. 2018;60(2):221-224. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2018.02.019.
5
Placement of Subcutaneous Central Venous Ports in Breast Cancer Patients: Does Side Matter?乳腺癌患者皮下中心静脉置管部位:侧别重要吗?
J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.028. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.用于前臂植入式中心静脉导管装置的聚氨酯导管与硅胶导管的比较
Eur J Cancer. 2016 May;59:113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
7
Fracture of totally implanted central venous access devices: a propensity-score-matched comparison of risks for Groshong silicone versus polyurethane catheters.完全植入式中心静脉通路装置的骨折:Groshong硅胶导管与聚氨酯导管风险的倾向评分匹配比较
J Vasc Access. 2016 Nov 2;17(6):535-541. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000606. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
Effect of catheter diameter on left innominate vein in breast cancer patients after totally implantable venous access port placement.完全植入式静脉通路端口置入术后导管直径对乳腺癌患者左无名静脉的影响。
J Vasc Access. 2018 Nov;19(6):615-619. doi: 10.1177/1129729818765062. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
9
Polyurethane versus silicone port a cath: What's going on at removal?聚氨酯与硅胶植入式静脉输液港:拔除时会发生什么情况?
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Jul;53(7):1417-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
10
Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.用于实体瘤化疗的、连接到Groshong导管的长期完全植入式中心静脉通路端口:178例使用单一类型装置的经验
Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jul;33(8):1190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00039-7.