Di Nota Paula Maria, Arpaia Joseph, Boychuk Evelyn Carol, Collins Peter I, Andersen Judith Pizarro
Health Adaptation Research on Trauma Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Department of Counseling Psychology and Human Services, University of Oregon, Eugene, ON, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:719046. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719046. eCollection 2021.
Contemporary discourse has identified several urgent priorities concerning police training and education, including: (a) empirically testing and validating the effectiveness of current programming in reducing lethal force decision-making errors; (b) integrating evidence-based content and pedagogical approaches into police curriculum; and (c) understanding the breadth and length of programming necessary to ensure learning and transfer of skills to operational field settings. Widespread calls to identify effective and actionable training programs have been met with numerous research studies, systematic reviews, and policy recommendations that reveal the need to train officers' internal physiological awareness, which is foundational in shaping cognitive decision-making, emotion regulation, and behavior under stressful conditions. Several investigations have shown improvements to both lethal force errors and physiological recovery following a multi-day autonomic modulation (AM) intervention. Immediate and sustained training gains are observed following repeated practice with clinically validated protocols integrated into training scenarios. Despite evidence-based support for AM in addressing the aforementioned priorities, police organizations are faced with limited time and funding for training and education. The goal of the current quasi-random pragmatic controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a modified 1-day version of an established AM intervention. A sample of active-duty police officers were quasi-randomly assigned to an AM intervention ( = 82) or waitlist control group ( = 105). Lethal force errors and objective measures of autonomic arousal and recovery were measured during reality-based scenarios pre- and post-training and at 12-month follow-up. In contrast to previous investigations of longer AM intervention protocols, no significant training-related improvements to behavioral or physiological outcomes were found immediately post-intervention or at follow-up. The current results suggest that single-day training is insufficient to learn the physiological awareness and regulation skills necessary to perform effectively during lethal force encounters, as demonstrated by a lack of immediate or sustained training effects. Practical considerations, such as resource allocation, that may undermine the effectiveness of implementing evidence-based police training are discussed.
当代的讨论已经确定了有关警察培训和教育的几个紧迫优先事项,包括:(a) 对当前方案在减少致命武力决策错误方面的有效性进行实证测试和验证;(b) 将基于证据的内容和教学方法纳入警察课程;以及 (c) 了解确保技能学习并将其转移到实际工作场景所需的培训广度和时长。为确定有效且可操作的培训方案而发出的广泛呼吁,引来了众多研究、系统综述和政策建议,这些都表明需要培训警察的内部生理意识,这是在压力条件下塑造认知决策、情绪调节和行为的基础。多项调查表明,经过多天的自主神经调节(AM)干预后,致命武力错误和生理恢复情况均有所改善。将经过临床验证的方案融入培训场景并反复练习后,可观察到即时且持续的训练效果。尽管有基于证据的支持表明 AM 可解决上述优先事项,但警察组织在培训和教育方面面临着时间和资金有限的问题。当前这项准随机实用对照试验的目的是评估一种经过修改的、为期 1 天的既定 AM 干预措施的有效性。在职警察样本被准随机分配到 AM 干预组(n = 82)或等待名单对照组(n = 105)。在基于现实的场景中,于训练前后以及 12 个月随访时测量致命武力错误以及自主神经唤醒和恢复的客观指标。与之前对较长 AM 干预方案的调查不同,在干预后即刻或随访时,未发现与训练相关的行为或生理结果有显著改善。当前结果表明,单日训练不足以学习在致命武力遭遇中有效执行所需的生理意识和调节技能,缺乏即时或持续的训练效果就证明了这一点。本文还讨论了可能会削弱实施基于证据的警察培训有效性的实际考虑因素,例如资源分配。