Iqbal Muaz, Gul Banat, Khan Shamim, Ashraf Sumara, Ahmad Iftikhar
Department of Physics, Islamia College Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
these authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
Biomed Opt Express. 2021 Jun 2;12(7):3743-3759. doi: 10.1364/BOE.426637. eCollection 2021 Jul 1.
The prevailing formalisms for isolating individual polarization effects from the experimental Mueller matrix can be broadly divided into two categories; decomposition of to derive the individual optical effects and directly associating the individual optical effects to specific elements of (i.e., non-decomposition techniques). Mueller matrix transformation (MMT) and direct interpretation of Mueller matrix (DIMM) are two popular techniques of the latter category. In this study, these two non-decomposition techniques (i.e., MMT and DIMM) are compared in a detailed quantitative analysis comprising of tissues (n = 53) and phantom (n = 45) samples. In particular, two commonly investigated polarimetric variables (i.e., depolarization and retardance) were calculated from the experimentally measured using both the non-decomposition (i.e., MMT and DIMM) techniques. The comparison carried out with scatter plots (integrated with the correlation coefficients), violin plots and Bland and Altman plots revealed better agreement of depolarization-related variables (as compared to the retardance) between the two non-decomposition techniques. The comparative analyses presented here would be beneficial for the interpretation of polarimetric variables and optical characterization of turbid media.
对穆勒矩阵进行分解以得出单个光学效应,以及将单个光学效应直接与穆勒矩阵的特定元素相关联(即非分解技术)。穆勒矩阵变换(MMT)和穆勒矩阵直接解释(DIMM)是后一类中两种常用的技术。在本研究中,对这两种非分解技术(即MMT和DIMM)进行了详细的定量分析比较,分析包括组织样本(n = 53)和体模样本(n = 45)。具体而言,使用这两种非分解技术(即MMT和DIMM),根据实验测量的穆勒矩阵计算了两个常用的偏振变量(即去极化和延迟)。通过散点图(结合相关系数)、小提琴图以及布兰德-奥特曼图进行的比较表明,在这两种非分解技术之间,与去极化相关的变量(与延迟相比)具有更好的一致性。此处给出的比较分析将有助于偏振变量的解释以及混浊介质的光学表征。