Suppr超能文献

通过类游戏干预中的心理保真度在健康课程中最大化真实学习和现实世界问题解决能力:开发、可行性及试点研究

Maximizing Authentic Learning and Real-World Problem-solving in Health Curricula Through Psychological Fidelity in a Game-Like Intervention: Development, Feasibility, and Pilot Studies.

作者信息

Kuipers Derek A, Terlouw Gijs, Wartena Bard O, Prins Jelle T, Pierie Jean Pierre E N

机构信息

NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences, Rengerslaan 10, 8917 DD Leeuwarden, Netherlands.

Medical Faculty LEARN, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2018 Dec 12;29(1):205-214. doi: 10.1007/s40670-018-00670-5. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Abstract

High fidelity is regarded as a hallmark of educational games and simulations for health education. Mainly physical and functional fidelity are associated with authenticity, resulting in the pursuit of a true-to-life simulation and suggesting the imposition of a generally accepted and often unintentional design rationale that assumes that the greater the fidelity of a game or simulation to the real world, the more authentic the intervention is perceived as. Psychological fidelity receives significantly less attention, although it correlates strongly to credibility, suspension of disbelief, and engagement. The BABLR simulator reduces physical and functional fidelity to a minimum and explores the use of psychological fidelity as the main carrier of an authentic learning experience. BABLR was assessed using 26 participants with varying backgrounds in health innovation and social work. In several pilot studies, we collected data on perceived realisticness and real-world relevance. Results show that experts, as well as participants, attest to BABLR's engagement, immersiveness, and motivational qualities. Practical implications of these findings for future research into developing low-fidelity simulations with high psychological fidelity will be discussed.

摘要

高保真度被视为健康教育类教育游戏和模拟的一个标志。主要是物理保真度和功能保真度与真实性相关,这导致人们追求逼真的模拟,并暗示了一种普遍接受且往往是无意的设计理念,即认为游戏或模拟对现实世界的保真度越高,其干预措施就越被认为是真实的。心理保真度受到的关注要少得多,尽管它与可信度、怀疑的悬置和参与度密切相关。BABLR模拟器将物理保真度和功能保真度降至最低,并探索将心理保真度用作真实学习体验的主要载体。我们使用了26名在健康创新和社会工作方面背景各异的参与者对BABLR进行了评估。在几项试点研究中,我们收集了关于感知现实性和现实世界相关性的数据。结果表明,专家以及参与者都证实了BABLR的参与性、沉浸感和激励特性。将讨论这些发现对未来开发具有高心理保真度的低保真度模拟研究的实际意义。

相似文献

3
The Role of Transfer in Designing Games and Simulations for Health: Systematic Review.
JMIR Serious Games. 2017 Nov 24;5(4):e23. doi: 10.2196/games.7880.
5
Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training.
Acad Med. 2014 Mar;89(3):387-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000130.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Transfer in Designing Games and Simulations for Health: Systematic Review.
JMIR Serious Games. 2017 Nov 24;5(4):e23. doi: 10.2196/games.7880.
2
The importance of design thinking in medical education.
Med Teach. 2018 Apr;40(4):425-426. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1399203. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
3
iLift: A health behavior change support system for lifting and transfer techniques to prevent lower-back injuries in healthcare.
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Dec;96:11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
4
An experimental study on the effects of a simulation game on students' clinical cognitive skills and motivation.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Aug;21(3):505-21. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9641-x. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
5
Science versus design; comparable, contrastive or conducive?
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 May;21:195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
6
Physical fidelity versus cognitive fidelity training in procedural skills acquisition.
Hum Factors. 2011 Oct;53(5):489-501. doi: 10.1177/0018720811412777.
7
AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 15: Problem-based learning: a practical guide.
Med Teach. 1999;21(2):130-40. doi: 10.1080/01421599979743.
8
Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
9
Competency-based medical education: theory to practice.
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638-45. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验