Suppr超能文献

解剖与预解剖:实验室实践考试的比较

Dissection Versus Prosection: a Comparison of Laboratory Practical Examinations.

作者信息

Aziz Mehak, Kernick Edward T, Beck Dallaghan Gary L, Gilliland Kurt O

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA.

Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2019 Oct 23;30(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00839-6. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Abstract

There is insufficient evidence supporting complete dissection as essential for medical student education. Due to physical constraints, we employed a hybrid teaching method. Gross anatomy practical examinations from two medical student classes were analyzed to determine performance on dissected versus student-prosected material. Overall, student performance on questions pertaining to personally dissected material was similar to performance on questions learned by studying student-prosected material. We found dissection time can be reduced without impacting medical student examination performance.

摘要

没有足够的证据支持完全解剖对于医学生教育至关重要这一观点。由于身体条件限制,我们采用了一种混合教学方法。对两个医学生班级的大体解剖实践考试进行了分析,以确定学生在解剖材料和学生整理材料上的表现。总体而言,学生在与亲自解剖材料相关问题上的表现与通过学习学生整理材料所学问题的表现相似。我们发现可以减少解剖时间而不影响医学生的考试成绩。

相似文献

1
Dissection Versus Prosection: a Comparison of Laboratory Practical Examinations.解剖与预解剖:实验室实践考试的比较
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Oct 23;30(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00839-6. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
Evaluation of a gross anatomy program without dissection.一项无解剖的大体解剖学课程评估。
J Med Educ. 1978 Mar;53(3):198-205. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197803000-00005.

本文引用的文献

3
A meta-analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies.解剖实验室教学法的荟萃分析。
Clin Anat. 2018 Jan;31(1):122-133. doi: 10.1002/ca.22934. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验