• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Medical Student Involvement and Perceptions of the Admissions Process.医学生对招生过程的参与度和看法。
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Mar 23;30(2):679-683. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00950-z. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Medical student views on the use of Facebook profile screening by residency admissions committees.医学生对住院医师招生委员会使用 Facebook 个人资料筛选的看法。
Postgrad Med J. 2014 May;90(1063):251-3. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132336. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
3
Matriculating student perceptions of changes to the admissions interview process at the University of Wisconsin Medical School: a prospective, controlled comparison.威斯康星大学医学院录取学生对招生面试过程变化的看法：一项前瞻性对照比较研究。
WMJ. 2003;102(2):30-3.
4
Justice and care: decision making by medical school student promotions committees.公正与关怀：医学院学生晋升委员会的决策
Med Educ. 2017 Jun;51(6):621-632. doi: 10.1111/medu.13280.
5
Students versus faculty members as admissions interviewers: comparisons of ratings data and admissions decisions.学生与教职员工作为招生面试官：评分数据和招生决策的比较。
Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):458-62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318249687d.
6
Working with dental school admissions committees to enroll a more diverse student body.与牙科学院招生委员会合作，招收更多元化的学生群体。
J Dent Educ. 2011 May;75(5):685-95.
7
Targeted Medical School Admissions: A Strategic Process for Meeting Our Social Mission.目标医学院校录取：实现我们社会使命的战略过程。
Fam Med. 2020 Jun;52(7):474-482. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2020.470334.
8
Perceptions of veterinary admissions committee members of undergraduate credits earned from community colleges or online compared to traditional 4-year institutions.与传统四年制院校相比，兽医学院招生委员会成员对社区学院或在线课程所获本科学分的看法。
Open Vet J. 2015;5(1):71-84. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
9
Medical students as teachers and role models for their future colleagues.医学生作为教师以及未来同事的榜样。
Med Teach. 2006 Nov;28(7):618-24. doi: 10.1080/01421590600922891.
10
Diversity in membership of medical school admissions committees.医学院招生委员会成员的多样性。
J Med Educ. 1984 Aug;59(8):634-42. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198408000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Revolutionizing Health Professions Admissions to Achieve an Inclusive Workforce.革新中国卫生专业人员招生，实现包容的劳动力队伍。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Feb;21(Suppl 2):S75-S81. doi: 10.1370/afm.2922.
2
Perspectives of Medical Student Interviewers Conducting Online Interviews During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间医学生面试官进行在线面试的观点
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Jun 2;31(4):1257. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01341-8. eCollection 2021 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
The Association Between a Holistic Review in Admissions Workshop and the Diversity of Accepted Applicants and Students Matriculating to Medical School.招生研讨会中整体评估与被医学院录取的申请人和学生多样性之间的关系。
Acad Med. 2019 Mar;94(3):396-403. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002446.
2
Strategies for Achieving Diversity through Medical School Admissions.通过医学院招生实现多元化的策略。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(1):9-18. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0002.
3
Medical School Applicant Characteristics Associated With Performance in Multiple Mini-Interviews Versus Traditional Interviews: A Multi-Institutional Study.多站式迷你面试与传统面试中表现相关的医学院申请人特征：一项多机构研究。
Acad Med. 2018 Jul;93(7):1029-1034. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002041.
4
Have admissions committees considered all the evidence?招生委员会是否考虑了所有证据？
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 May;22(2):573-576. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9750-1. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
5
How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review.医学教育中的选择方法有多有效？系统评价。
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):36-60. doi: 10.1111/medu.12817.
6
Students versus faculty members as admissions interviewers: comparisons of ratings data and admissions decisions.学生与教职员工作为招生面试官：评分数据和招生决策的比较。
Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):458-62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318249687d.
7
Current medical student interviewers add data to the evaluation of medical school applicants.当前的医学生面试官会在对医学院申请者的评估中添加数据。
Med Educ Online. 2010 Jun 9;15. doi: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5245.
8
The medical student interviewer.医学生面试官。
Med Educ. 2008 Jul;42(7):746. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03117.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
9
Contribution of medical students to admission interviews.医学生在入学面试中的贡献。
Med Educ. 2008 Mar;42(3):315-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02966.x. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
10
Faculty and students as admissions interviewers: results of a questionnaire given to applicants.作为招生面试官的教师和学生：对申请者进行问卷调查的结果
J Med Educ. 1975 Jun;50(6):626-8.

医学生对招生过程的参与度和看法。

Medical Student Involvement and Perceptions of the Admissions Process.

作者信息

Goldwag Jenaya L, Panitz Aileen K, Pinto-Powell Roshini

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH USA.

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 3 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2020 Mar 23;30(2):679-683. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00950-z. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-020-00950-z
PMID:34457724
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8368167/
Abstract

Minimal attention has been given to student involvement in medical school admissions practices. This study explores the role of medical students and perceptions of their involvement on admissions committees. Survey responses from US medical schools were varied regarding student role, service on the committee, and voting privileges. Medical student admissions committee members surveyed at our institution felt they were able to offer different perspectives to applicant evaluation than faculty. Findings suggest that medical students may be able to contribute to the admissions process in a variety of ways depending on institution-specific missions and goals.

摘要

医学院招生实践中学生的参与度很少受到关注。本研究探讨了医学生的角色以及招生委员会对他们参与情况的看法。美国医学院的调查回复在学生角色、委员会服务和投票特权方面各不相同。在我们机构接受调查的医学院招生委员会成员认为，与教师相比，他们能够为申请人评估提供不同的视角。研究结果表明，根据各机构的特定使命和目标，医学生可能能够以多种方式为招生过程做出贡献。