Brown Megan E L, Coker Oluwafemi, Heybourne Annabel, Finn Gabrielle M
Health Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, John Hughlings Jackson Building, University Road, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Jul 24;30(3):1107-1121. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01021-z. eCollection 2020 Sep.
The hidden curriculum within medical education has been a topic of recent debate. Consensus opinion regarding the continued relevance of this term, what constitutes the hidden curriculum, and the nature of its impact do not exist. Further research is required to contribute to this debate. This work sets out to investigate which factors beyond taught cognitive knowledge influence medical students in clinical and educational environments and examine how this occurs. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 39 students from one UK medical school. Fourteen faculty were interviewed individually to triangulate data. Data were analysed using constructivist thematic analysis, informed by grounded theory convention. The presence of the hidden curriculum was clearly demonstrated, acting through role modelling, organizational culture, stereotyping and professional dress. Mentioned frequently were the influences of the hidden curriculum on student professionalism and identity development. Professionalism was perceived as being negatively impacted by the hidden curriculum and seen as an imposition from senior faculty to control students. Students believe medical identity formation begins prior to medical school, in a process known as "anticipatory socialization", a previously unstudied identity transition. Students felt covert institutional agendas negatively impacted their identity, pushing them further from the identity their institution was encouraging them to acquire. Key messages for educators include the need to explore the hidden curriculum through discussion with students. Improving transparency of organizational culture may allow students to interpret institutional agendas in the way institutions formally intend, reducing orthogonal interpretations of organizational culture and subsequent impact upon identity formation.
医学教育中的隐性课程一直是近期讨论的话题。对于这一术语的持续相关性、构成隐性课程的要素及其影响的性质,目前尚未达成共识。需要进一步的研究来推动这一讨论。这项工作旨在调查除了所教授的认知知识之外,还有哪些因素在临床和教育环境中影响医学生,并研究其影响方式。对一所英国医学院的39名学生进行了半结构化焦点小组访谈。对14名教员进行了单独访谈以对数据进行三角互证。采用基于扎根理论惯例的建构主义主题分析法对数据进行分析。隐性课程的存在得到了明确证明,它通过榜样示范、组织文化、刻板印象和职业着装发挥作用。隐性课程对学生职业素养和身份认同发展的影响被频繁提及。职业素养被认为受到隐性课程的负面影响,被视为高级教员为控制学生而施加的要求。学生们认为医学身份认同的形成在医学院之前就开始了,这一过程被称为“预期社会化”,是一个此前未被研究过的身份转变。学生们感到隐蔽的机构议程对他们的身份认同产生了负面影响,使他们离机构鼓励他们获得的身份认同越来越远。给教育工作者的关键信息包括需要通过与学生讨论来探索隐性课程。提高组织文化的透明度可能会让学生按照机构正式期望的方式解读机构议程,减少对组织文化的正交解读以及对身份认同形成的后续影响。