• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告的与医疗团队就慢性淋巴细胞白血病新治疗方案的沟通情况。

Patient-Reported Communication With Their Health Care Team About New Treatment Options for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

作者信息

Kranzler Elissa C, Olson Julie S, Nichols Helen M, Yuen Eva Yn, McManus Shauna, Buzaglo Joanne S, Zaleta Alexandra K

机构信息

Cancer Support Community, Research and Training Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Cancer Support Community, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2021 Aug 25;8:23743735211034967. doi: 10.1177/23743735211034967. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1177/23743735211034967
PMID:34458567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8392805/
Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often requires consideration of multiple treatment options. Shared decision-making (SDM) is important, given the availability of increasingly novel therapies; however, patient-provider treatment conversations vary. We examined relationships between patient-provider discussions of new CLL treatment options and sociodemographic, clinical, and patient-provider communication variables among 187 CLL patients enrolled in Cancer Support Community's Cancer Experience Registry. Factors significantly associated with self-reports of whether patients' providers discussed new CLL treatment options with them were examined using χ tests, tests, and hierarchical logistic regression. Fifty-eight percent of patients reported discussing new treatment options with their doctor. Patients with higher education were 3 times more likely to discuss new treatment options relative to those with lower education (OR = 3.06, < .05). Patients who experienced a cancer recurrence were 7 times more likely to discuss new treatment options compared to those who had not (OR = 7.01, < .05). Findings offer insights into the correlates of patient-provider discussions of new CLL treatment options. As novel therapies are incorporated into standards of care, opportunities exist for providers to improve patient care through enhanced SDM.

摘要

慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)通常需要考虑多种治疗方案。鉴于越来越多新疗法的出现,共同决策(SDM)很重要;然而,医患之间关于治疗的对话存在差异。我们在癌症支持社区癌症经验登记处登记的187例CLL患者中,研究了医患关于新的CLL治疗方案的讨论与社会人口统计学、临床以及医患沟通变量之间的关系。使用χ检验、检验和分层逻辑回归分析了与患者关于其医生是否与他们讨论新的CLL治疗方案的自我报告显著相关的因素。58%的患者报告与医生讨论了新的治疗方案。与低学历患者相比,高学历患者讨论新治疗方案的可能性高出3倍(OR = 3.06,< .05)。与未经历癌症复发的患者相比,经历癌症复发的患者讨论新治疗方案的可能性高出7倍(OR = 7.01,< .05)。研究结果为医患关于新的CLL治疗方案讨论的相关因素提供了见解。随着新疗法被纳入护理标准,医疗服务提供者有机会通过加强共同决策来改善患者护理。

相似文献

1
Patient-Reported Communication With Their Health Care Team About New Treatment Options for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.患者报告的与医疗团队就慢性淋巴细胞白血病新治疗方案的沟通情况。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Aug 25;8:23743735211034967. doi: 10.1177/23743735211034967. eCollection 2021.
2
Improving shared decision-making in chronic lymphocytic leukemia through multidisciplinary education.通过多学科教育改善慢性淋巴细胞白血病的共同决策。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):175-182. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx034.
3
Simulated Conversations With Virtual Humans to Improve Patient-Provider Communication and Reduce Unnecessary Prescriptions for Antibiotics: A Repeated Measure Pilot Study.与虚拟人进行模拟对话以改善医患沟通并减少不必要的抗生素处方:一项重复测量的试点研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2017 Apr 19;3(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/mededu.6305.
4
An Exploratory Pilot Study to Describe Shared Decision-Making for PTSD Treatment Planning: The Provider Perspective.一项描述创伤后应激障碍治疗计划共同决策的探索性试点研究:提供者视角。
Mil Med. 2019 Mar 1;184(Suppl 1):467-475. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy407.
5
Shared Decision Making in Primary Care Based Depression Treatment: Communication and Decision-Making Preferences Among an Underserved Patient Population.基层医疗中基于共享决策的抑郁症治疗:服务不足患者群体的沟通与决策偏好
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 12;12:681165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681165. eCollection 2021.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment: So many choices, such great options.慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)治疗:如此多的选择,如此好的选择。
Cancer. 2019 May 1;125(9):1432-1440. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31931. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
8
Patient and provider perspectives on uptake of a shared decision making intervention for asthma in primary care practices.患者与医疗服务提供者对基层医疗实践中哮喘共同决策干预措施接受情况的看法。
J Asthma. 2019 May;56(5):562-572. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1471703. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
The Association of Patient Chronic Disease Burden and Self-Management Requirements With Shared Decision Making in Primary Care Visits.基层医疗就诊中患者慢性病负担及自我管理需求与共同决策的关联
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;1. doi: 10.1177/2333392814538775. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
10
Patient and provider experiences with active surveillance: A scoping review.患者和医疗服务提供者在主动监测方面的经历:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0192097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192097. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication and Shared Decision Making in the Breast Cancer Treatment Consultation: A Comparative Analysis of English- and Spanish-Speaking Patients.乳腺癌治疗咨询中的沟通与共同决策:英语和西班牙语患者的比较分析
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Oct 28;4(2):2381468319881651. doi: 10.1177/2381468319881651. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.
2
Current Prevalence of Major Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Test Use in the United States: Disparities by Education and Race/Ethnicity.美国主要癌症风险因素和筛查检测使用的现状:按教育和种族/族裔划分的差异。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Apr;28(4):629-642. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1169.
3
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature.肿瘤学中共享决策的障碍和促进因素:文献系统综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1613-1637. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04675-7. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
4
Improving shared decision-making in chronic lymphocytic leukemia through multidisciplinary education.通过多学科教育改善慢性淋巴细胞白血病的共同决策。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):175-182. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx034.
5
Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.患者和医生对癌症共同决策的看法。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1248-1253. doi: 10.1111/hex.12564. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
The Effects of Race and Racial Concordance on Patient-Physician Communication: A Systematic Review of the Literature.种族和种族一致性对医患沟通的影响:文献系统评价。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Feb;5(1):117-140. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0350-4. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
7
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Version 1.2017.NCCN 指南解读:慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤,第 1.2017 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Mar;15(3):293-311. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0030.
8
New Pharmacotherapies in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.慢性淋巴细胞白血病的新药物疗法
P T. 2017 Feb;42(2):106-115.
9
Targeted therapies for CLL: Practical issues with the changing treatment paradigm.慢性淋巴细胞白血病的靶向治疗:治疗模式转变带来的实际问题
Blood Rev. 2016 May;30(3):233-44. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
10
Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab treatment achieves long-term disease-free survival in IGHV-mutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗联合治疗可使免疫球蛋白重链可变区(IGHV)突变的慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者获得长期无病生存。
Blood. 2016 Jan 21;127(3):303-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-09-667675. Epub 2015 Oct 22.