• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和医生对癌症共同决策的看法。

Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

The University of California, San Francisco-East Bay, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1248-1253. doi: 10.1111/hex.12564. Epub 2017 May 2.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12564
PMID:28464430
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5689235/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Engaging patients in shared decision making involves patient knowledge of treatment options and physician elicitation of patient preferences.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to explore patient and physician perceptions of shared decision making in clinical encounters for cancer care.

DESIGN

Patients and physicians were asked open-ended questions regarding their perceptions of shared decision making throughout their cancer care. Transcripts of interviews were coded and analysed for shared decision-making themes.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

At an academic medical centre, 20 cancer patients with a range of cancer diagnoses, stages of cancer and time from diagnosis, and eight physicians involved in cancer care were individually interviewed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Most physicians reported providing patients with written information. However, most patients reported that written information was too detailed and felt that the physicians did not assess the level of information they wished to receive. Most patients wanted to play an active role in the treatment decision, but also wanted the physician's recommendation, such as what their physician would choose for him/herself or a family member in a similar situation. While physicians stated that they incorporated patient autonomy in decision making, most provided data without making treatment recommendations in the format preferred by most patients. We identified several communication gaps in cancer care. While patients want to be involved in the decision-making process, they also want physicians to provide evidence-based recommendations in the context of their individual preferences. However, physicians often are reluctant to provide a recommendation that will bias the patient.

摘要

背景

让患者参与共同决策需要患者了解治疗方案,以及医生了解患者的偏好。

目的

我们旨在探讨癌症护理临床实践中患者和医生对共同决策的看法。

设计

患者和医生被问到有关他们在癌症护理过程中对共同决策的看法的开放式问题。对访谈的文字记录进行编码和分析,以确定共同决策主题。

地点和参与者

在一家学术医疗中心,对 20 名癌症患者(具有不同的癌症诊断、癌症分期和诊断后时间)和 8 名参与癌症护理的医生进行了个体访谈。

讨论和结论

大多数医生报告说为患者提供了书面信息。然而,大多数患者报告说书面信息过于详细,并且认为医生没有评估他们希望接收的信息水平。大多数患者希望在治疗决策中发挥积极作用,但也希望医生提出建议,例如他们的医生在类似情况下会为自己或家人选择什么。虽然医生表示他们在决策中纳入了患者的自主权,但大多数医生在大多数患者偏好的格式中提供数据而不提出治疗建议。我们在癌症护理中发现了几个沟通差距。虽然患者希望参与决策过程,但他们也希望医生根据他们的个人偏好提供基于证据的建议。然而,医生通常不愿意提供可能影响患者的建议。

相似文献

1
Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.患者和医生对癌症共同决策的看法。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1248-1253. doi: 10.1111/hex.12564. Epub 2017 May 2.
2
Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.对信息的需求及参与治疗决策的情况:老年癌症患者的偏好及其医生的认知
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5275-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922.
3
Physicians' decision-making roles for an acutely unstable critically and terminally ill patient.急性不稳定的重病和终末期患者的医生决策角色。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1511-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318287f0dd.
4
Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions.乳腺癌的治疗决策:患者偏好与医生认知
Cancer. 2002 Apr 1;94(7):2076-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10393.
5
Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision.患者与医生的一致性:影响乳腺癌手术决策的偏好、认知及因素
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 1;22(15):3091-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.069.
6
Why do medical residents prefer paternalistic decision making? An interview study.为什么住院医师更喜欢家长式决策?一项访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03203-2.
7
Pharmacotherapy decision-making among patients with breast cancer in Japan: results of an online survey.日本乳腺癌患者的药物治疗决策:一项在线调查结果。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Nov;26(6):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00986-z. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
8
Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?为什么有些患者更愿意将决策交给医生:是缺乏自我效能感还是信任问题?
J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Dec;7(4):592-601. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0298-2. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
9
Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures.患者对风险披露的偏好以及在侵入性医疗程序决策中的作用。
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Feb;12(2):114-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00016.x.
10
Factors which motivate cancer doctors to involve their patients in reaching treatment decisions.促使癌症医生让患者参与治疗决策的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.018. Epub 2010 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and Physician Preferences for Maintenance Treatment in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Insights into Treatment Selection.晚期非小细胞肺癌维持治疗中患者与医生的偏好:对治疗选择的见解
Adv Ther. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03347-9.
2
The views of women and their physicians on decision-making for stress urinary incontinence.女性及其医生对压力性尿失禁决策的看法。
World J Urol. 2025 May 26;43(1):329. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05668-4.
3
Comforting styles of serious illness conversations: a Swiss wide factorial survey study.重症疾病谈话中的安慰方式:一项瑞士范围内的析因调查研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 14;23(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04046-6.
4
Associations between physicians' personal preferences for end-of-life decisions and their own clinical practice: PROPEL survey study in Europe, North America, and Australia.医生对临终决策的个人偏好与其临床实践之间的关联:欧洲、北美和澳大利亚的PROPEL调查研究
Palliat Med. 2025 Feb;39(2):266-276. doi: 10.1177/02692163241300853. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
5
Is shared decision making an aspect of palliative care integration? An observation of collaboration between oncologists and palliative care professionals.共同决策是姑息治疗整合的一个方面吗?对肿瘤学家与姑息治疗专业人员之间合作的观察。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 6;23(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01608-y.
6
Exploring Patients' Perceptions of One-step Surgery for Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: A Qualitative Study.探究患者对原发性皮肤黑色素瘤一步手术的看法:一项定性研究。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 Sep 24;104:adv40064. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.40064.
7
Using Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Approach to Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Osteoarthritis Management: A Patient Perception Study.运用基于适应性选择的联合分析方法促进骨关节炎管理中的共同决策:一项患者认知研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Feb;77(2):240-250. doi: 10.1002/acr.25429. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
8
Reducing anxiety and enhancing satisfaction in thyroid patients with DietLens application during radioactive iodine therapy: A quasi-experimental study.在放射性碘治疗期间使用DietLens应用程序减轻甲状腺患者的焦虑并提高满意度:一项准实验研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 30;10(15):e35450. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35450. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
9
Optimising head and neck cancer patient management: the crucial contributions of multidisciplinary tumour board decision-making.优化头颈癌患者管理:多学科肿瘤委员会决策的关键贡献
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Jun 4;18:1710. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1710. eCollection 2024.
10
Availability and utilization of molecular testing for primary central nervous system tumors among US hospitals.美国医院中原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤分子检测的可及性和使用情况。
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2024 Jun 20;83(7):579-585. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlae035.

本文引用的文献

1
"Doctor, what would you do?": physicians' responses to patient inquiries about periviable delivery.“医生,你会怎么做?”:医生对患者关于可存活孕周前分娩问题的回应
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jan;98(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
2
Do unto others: doctors' personal end-of-life resuscitation preferences and their attitudes toward advance directives.己所不欲,勿施于人:医生个人的临终复苏偏好及其对预立医疗指示的态度。
PLoS One. 2014 May 28;9(5):e98246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098246. eCollection 2014.
3
Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009.2000 年、2005 年和 2009 年 Medicare 受益人生死地点、护理地点和医疗保健转归的变化。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 6;309(5):470-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.207624.
4
Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs.通过共同决策改善医疗服务并降低成本。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):6-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1209500.
5
Patients' expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer.晚期癌症化疗效果的患者期望。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 25;367(17):1616-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204410.
6
Introducing decision aids at Group Health was linked to sharply lower hip and knee surgery rates and costs.在 GroupHealth 引入决策辅助工具与髋关节和膝关节手术率和成本的大幅下降有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Sep;31(9):2094-104. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0686.
7
Feasibility of training oncology residents in shared decision making: a pilot study.培训肿瘤学住院医师进行共同决策的可行性:一项试点研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(3):456-62. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0371-y.
8
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
9
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.胰腺腺癌
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Sep;8(9):972-1017. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0073.
10
The Affordable Care Act and the future of clinical medicine: the opportunities and challenges.平价医疗法案与临床医学的未来:机遇与挑战。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 19;153(8):536-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00274. Epub 2010 Aug 23.