Suppr超能文献

日本全国队列研究:院外心脏骤停成年患者的院前高级气道管理时机。

Timing of Prehospital Advanced Airway Management for Adult Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA.

Division of Biomedical Statistics Department of Integrated Medicine Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 7;10(17):e021679. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021679. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

Abstract

Background The timing of advanced airway management (AAM) on patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has not been fully investigated. We evaluated the association between the timing of prehospital AAM and 1-month survival. Methods and Results We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective, nationwide, population-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry in Japan. We included emergency medical services-treated adult (≥18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from 2014 through 2017, stratified into initial shockable or nonshockable rhythms. Patients who received AAM at any minute after emergency medical services-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation underwent risk-set matching with patients who were at risk of receiving AAM within the same minute using time-dependent propensity scores. Eleven thousand three hundred six patients with AAM in shockable and 163 796 with AAM in nonshockable cohorts, respectively, underwent risk-set matching. For shockable rhythms, the risk ratios (95% CIs) of AAM on 1-month survival were 1.01 (0.89-1.15) between 0 and 5 minutes, 1.06 (0.98-1.15) between 5 and 10 minutes, 0.99 (0.87-1.12) between 10 and 15 minutes, 0.74 (0.59-0.92) between 15 and 20 minutes, 0.61 (0.37-1.00) between 20 and 25 minutes, and 0.73 (0.26-2.07) between 25 and 30 minutes after emergency medical services-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. For nonshockable rhythms, the risk ratios of AAM were 1.12 (1.00-1.27) between 0 and 5 minutes, 1.34 (1.25-1.44) between 5 and 10 minutes, 1.39 (1.26-1.54) between 10 and 15 minutes, 1.20 (0.99-1.45) between 15 and 20 minutes, 1.18 (0.80-1.73) between 20 and 25 minutes, 0.63 (0.29-1.38) between 25 and 30 minutes, and 0.44 (0.11-1.69) after 30 minutes. Conclusions In this observational study, the timing of AAM was not statistically associated with improved 1-month survival for shockable rhythms, but AAM within 15 minutes after emergency medical services-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with improved 1-month survival for nonshockable rhythms.

摘要

背景

在院外心脏骤停后,高级气道管理(AAM)的时机对患者预后的影响尚未得到充分研究。我们评估了院前 AAM 时机与 1 个月生存率之间的关联。

方法和结果

我们对日本一项前瞻性、全国性、基于人群的院外心脏骤停登记处进行了二次分析。我们纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年接受急救医疗服务的成年(≥18 岁)院外心脏骤停患者,并按初始可电击或不可电击节律分层。在急救医疗服务启动心肺复苏后任何一分钟接受 AAM 的患者,与同一分钟内有接受 AAM 风险的患者进行风险集匹配,使用时间依赖性倾向评分。在可电击节律组中,AAM 在 1 个月生存率方面的风险比(95%CI)分别为:0-5 分钟为 1.01(0.89-1.15),5-10 分钟为 1.06(0.98-1.15),10-15 分钟为 0.99(0.87-1.12),15-20 分钟为 0.74(0.59-0.92),20-25 分钟为 0.61(0.37-1.00),25-30 分钟为 0.73(0.26-2.07)。在不可电击节律组中,AAM 的风险比分别为:0-5 分钟为 1.12(1.00-1.27),5-10 分钟为 1.34(1.25-1.44),10-15 分钟为 1.39(1.26-1.54),15-20 分钟为 1.20(0.99-1.45),20-25 分钟为 1.18(0.80-1.73),25-30 分钟为 0.63(0.29-1.38),30 分钟后为 0.44(0.11-1.69)。

结论

在这项观察性研究中,AAM 的时机与可电击节律的 1 个月生存率的提高没有统计学关联,但在急救医疗服务启动心肺复苏后 15 分钟内进行 AAM 与不可电击节律的 1 个月生存率提高有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d664/8649292/396c3b552f01/JAH3-10-e021679-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验