Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh PA.
Division of Biomedical Statistics Department of Integrated Medicine Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 7;10(17):e021679. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021679. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
Background The timing of advanced airway management (AAM) on patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has not been fully investigated. We evaluated the association between the timing of prehospital AAM and 1-month survival. Methods and Results We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective, nationwide, population-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry in Japan. We included emergency medical services-treated adult (≥18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from 2014 through 2017, stratified into initial shockable or nonshockable rhythms. Patients who received AAM at any minute after emergency medical services-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation underwent risk-set matching with patients who were at risk of receiving AAM within the same minute using time-dependent propensity scores. Eleven thousand three hundred six patients with AAM in shockable and 163 796 with AAM in nonshockable cohorts, respectively, underwent risk-set matching. For shockable rhythms, the risk ratios (95% CIs) of AAM on 1-month survival were 1.01 (0.89-1.15) between 0 and 5 minutes, 1.06 (0.98-1.15) between 5 and 10 minutes, 0.99 (0.87-1.12) between 10 and 15 minutes, 0.74 (0.59-0.92) between 15 and 20 minutes, 0.61 (0.37-1.00) between 20 and 25 minutes, and 0.73 (0.26-2.07) between 25 and 30 minutes after emergency medical services-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. For nonshockable rhythms, the risk ratios of AAM were 1.12 (1.00-1.27) between 0 and 5 minutes, 1.34 (1.25-1.44) between 5 and 10 minutes, 1.39 (1.26-1.54) between 10 and 15 minutes, 1.20 (0.99-1.45) between 15 and 20 minutes, 1.18 (0.80-1.73) between 20 and 25 minutes, 0.63 (0.29-1.38) between 25 and 30 minutes, and 0.44 (0.11-1.69) after 30 minutes. Conclusions In this observational study, the timing of AAM was not statistically associated with improved 1-month survival for shockable rhythms, but AAM within 15 minutes after emergency medical services-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with improved 1-month survival for nonshockable rhythms.
在院外心脏骤停后,高级气道管理(AAM)的时机对患者预后的影响尚未得到充分研究。我们评估了院前 AAM 时机与 1 个月生存率之间的关联。
我们对日本一项前瞻性、全国性、基于人群的院外心脏骤停登记处进行了二次分析。我们纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年接受急救医疗服务的成年(≥18 岁)院外心脏骤停患者,并按初始可电击或不可电击节律分层。在急救医疗服务启动心肺复苏后任何一分钟接受 AAM 的患者,与同一分钟内有接受 AAM 风险的患者进行风险集匹配,使用时间依赖性倾向评分。在可电击节律组中,AAM 在 1 个月生存率方面的风险比(95%CI)分别为:0-5 分钟为 1.01(0.89-1.15),5-10 分钟为 1.06(0.98-1.15),10-15 分钟为 0.99(0.87-1.12),15-20 分钟为 0.74(0.59-0.92),20-25 分钟为 0.61(0.37-1.00),25-30 分钟为 0.73(0.26-2.07)。在不可电击节律组中,AAM 的风险比分别为:0-5 分钟为 1.12(1.00-1.27),5-10 分钟为 1.34(1.25-1.44),10-15 分钟为 1.39(1.26-1.54),15-20 分钟为 1.20(0.99-1.45),20-25 分钟为 1.18(0.80-1.73),25-30 分钟为 0.63(0.29-1.38),30 分钟后为 0.44(0.11-1.69)。
在这项观察性研究中,AAM 的时机与可电击节律的 1 个月生存率的提高没有统计学关联,但在急救医疗服务启动心肺复苏后 15 分钟内进行 AAM 与不可电击节律的 1 个月生存率提高有关。