Kahlke Renate, Pratt Daniel D, Bluman Bob, Overhill Kirstie, Eva Kevin W
Dr. Kahlke: Research Associate, Research Unit, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and Adjunct Professor, Department of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa. Dr. Pratt: Professor Emeritus, Department of Educational Studies and Senior Scholar, Centre for Health Education Scholarship, University of British Columbia. Dr. Bluman: Executive Medical Director, Division of Continuing Professional Development, University of British Columbia. Dr. Overhill: Past President, BC College of Family Physicians CORE Committee Member, Rural Coordination Centre (RCC/bc). Dr. Eva: Senior Scientist, Centre for Health Education Scholarship and Professor, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):5-13. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000382.
Effective continuing professional development (CPD) is critical for safe and effective health care. Recent shifts have called for a move away from didactic CPD, which often fails to affect practice, toward workplace learning such as clinical coaching. Unfortunately, coaching programs are complex, and adoption does not guarantee effectiveness. To resolve this problem, thus ensuring resources are well spent, there is a critical need to understand what physicians try to achieve and how they engage. Therefore, we examined the types of change physicians pursue through clinical coaching and the impact of context on their desired changes.
In the context of two clinical coaching programs for rural physicians, we applied a generic qualitative approach. Coachees (N = 15) participated in semistructured interviews. Analysis involved iterative cycles of initial, focused, and theoretical coding.
Coachees articulated desired practice changes along a spectrum, ranging from honing their current practice to making larger changes that involved new skills outside their current practice; changes also ranged from those focused on individual physicians to those focused on the practice system. Desired changes were affected by factors in the learning/practice environment, including those related to the individual coachee, coach, and learning/practice context.
These results suggest that the current focus on acquiring new knowledge through CPD may miss important learning that involves subtle shifts in practice as well as learning that focusses on systems change. Moreover, an appreciation of the contextual nature of CPD can ensure that contextual affordances are leveraged and barriers are acknowledged.
有效的持续专业发展(CPD)对于安全有效的医疗保健至关重要。最近的转变要求从通常无法影响实践的讲授式CPD转向诸如临床辅导等工作场所学习。不幸的是,辅导计划很复杂,采用并不保证有效。为了解决这个问题,从而确保资源得到有效利用,迫切需要了解医生试图实现的目标以及他们的参与方式。因此,我们研究了医生通过临床辅导追求的变革类型以及背景对他们期望变革的影响。
在针对农村医生的两个临床辅导计划的背景下,我们采用了通用的定性方法。学员(N = 15)参与了半结构化访谈。分析涉及初始编码、重点编码和理论编码的迭代循环。
学员们阐述了一系列期望的实践变革,从磨练他们当前的实践到进行更大的变革,包括他们当前实践之外的新技能;变革范围也从关注个体医生到关注实践系统。期望的变革受到学习/实践环境中的因素影响,包括与个体学员、教练以及学习/实践背景相关的因素。
这些结果表明,当前通过CPD获取新知识的重点可能会错过重要的学习,包括实践中的细微转变以及关注系统变革的学习。此外,认识到CPD的背景性质可以确保利用背景条件并承认障碍。