• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Advancing Intersectional Discrimination Measures for Health Disparities Research: Protocol for a Bilingual Mixed Methods Measurement Study.推进健康差异研究中的交叉歧视测量方法:一项双语混合方法测量研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 30;10(8):e30987. doi: 10.2196/30987.
2
The Intersectional Discrimination Index: Development and validation of measures of self-reported enacted and anticipated discrimination for intercategorical analysis.交叉歧视指数:用于跨类别分析的自我报告实施和预期歧视测量的开发和验证。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
3
Biopsychosocial Mechanisms Linking Gender Minority Stress to HIV Comorbidities Among Black and Latina Transgender Women (LITE Plus): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Longitudinal Study.将性别少数群体压力与黑人和拉丁裔跨性别女性的艾滋病毒合并症联系起来的生物心理社会机制(LITE Plus):一项混合方法纵向研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 13;9(4):e17076. doi: 10.2196/17076.
4
Methods for analytic intercategorical intersectionality in quantitative research: Discrimination as a mediator of health inequalities.定量研究中分析类别交叉性的方法:歧视作为健康不平等的中介
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:236-245. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
5
HIV-Related Intersectional Stigma and Discrimination Measurement: State of the Science.HIV 相关交叉歧视与污名测量:科学现状。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S4):S420-S432. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306639.
6
Geometric approach to measuring intersectional stigma among black sexual minority men: reliability and validity in an HIV prevention context.测量黑人性少数男性交叉污名的几何方法:在艾滋病预防背景下的信度和效度
Sex Health. 2023 Oct;20(5):441-452. doi: 10.1071/SH23021.
7
Intersectional forms of racism and sexual minority stress are associated with alcohol use among Latinx sexual minority men with greater Hispanic/Latinx cultural orientation.交叉形式的种族主义和性少数群体压力与具有较强西班牙裔/拉丁裔文化取向的拉丁裔性少数群体男性的饮酒行为有关。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2023 Mar 4;49(2):228-238. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2023.2176235. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
8
Utilizing Latent Class Analysis to Assess the Association of Intersectional Stigma on Mental Health Outcomes Among Young Adult Black, Indigenous, and Sexual Minority Women of Color.利用潜在类别分析评估交叉污名对年轻成年非裔、原住民和性少数有色人种女性心理健康结果的影响。
LGBT Health. 2023 Aug-Sep;10(6):463-470. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2022.0083. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
9
Inequities Gone or Enduring? Evaluating the Effects of a School-Based Antistigma Intervention on Race/Ethnic and Gender Intersectional Disparities in Mental Illness Stigma.不平等现象消失还是持续存在?评估一项基于学校的反污名干预对精神疾病污名中种族/族裔与性别交叉差异的影响。
Stigma Health. 2023 Aug;8(3):381-392. doi: 10.1037/sah0000406. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
10
Substance Use Disparities at the Intersection of Sexual Identity and Race/Ethnicity: Results from the 2015-2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.物质使用在性认同和种族/民族交叉点上的差异:2015-2018 年全国药物使用与健康调查的结果。
LGBT Health. 2020 Aug/Sep;7(6):283-291. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2019.0352. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.改进观察性研究中健康公平性的报告(STROBE-公平性):扩展清单及阐述
BMJ. 2025 Sep 3;390:e083882. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083882.
2
Intersectional discrimination, mental health, and health care access among transgender women in Brazil.巴西跨性别女性中的交叉性歧视、心理健康与医疗保健获取情况
Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;44(3):256-265. doi: 10.1037/hea0001447.
3
Developing Guidelines for Conducting Stigma Research With Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals: Protocol for Creation of a Trauma-Informed Approach to Research.制定针对跨性别者和非二元性别者进行污名研究的指南:创建创伤知情研究方法的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 6;14:e66800. doi: 10.2196/66800.
4
Multiple Dimensions of Machismo: Linguistic Considerations for Latino Sexual Minority Men in the United States.男子气概的多个维度:美国拉丁裔性少数群体男性的语言考量
J Mens Stud. 2024 Oct;32(3):421-449. doi: 10.1177/10608265241234361. Epub 2024 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods.定量研究中的交叉性:对其理论与方法的出现及应用的系统综述
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Apr 16;14:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Intersectionality in quantitative health disparities research: A systematic review of challenges and limitations in empirical studies.定量健康差异研究中的交叉性:实证研究中挑战与局限的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113876. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113876. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
Measures of Racism, Sexism, Heterosexism, and Gender Binarism for Health Equity Research: From Structural Injustice to Embodied Harm-An Ecosocial Analysis.用于健康公平研究的种族主义、性别歧视、异性恋主义和性别二元论的衡量标准:从结构性不公正到身体伤害——生态社会分析。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;41:37-62. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094017. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
4
Structural stigma and all-cause mortality among sexual minorities: Differences by sexual behavior?结构性污名与性少数群体的全因死亡率:性行为差异?
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;244:112463. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112463. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
5
Measuring perceived mistreatment across diverse social groups: An evaluation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale.测量不同社会群体感知到的虐待:日常歧视量表的评估。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 14.
6
Advancing quantitative intersectionality research methods: Intracategorical and intercategorical approaches to shared and differential constructs.推进定量交叉性研究方法:类别内和类别间方法对共享和差异结构的研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:260-262. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
7
Coding the Everyday Discrimination Scale: implications for exposure assessment and associations with hypertension and depression among a cross section of mid-life African American women.对日常生活歧视量表进行编码:对横断面研究中中年非裔美国女性的暴露评估和高血压及抑郁相关性的启示。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jun;73(6):577-584. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211230. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
8
Intersectional decomposition analysis with differential exposure, effects, and construct.交叉分解分析与差异暴露、效应和构建。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:254-259. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
9
Quantifying intersectionality: An important advancement for health inequality research.量化交叉性:健康不平等研究的重要进展。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:246-248. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
The promise and pitfalls of intersectional scale development.交叉性量表开发的前景与陷阱
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;223:73-76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.039. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

推进健康差异研究中的交叉歧视测量方法:一项双语混合方法测量研究的方案

Advancing Intersectional Discrimination Measures for Health Disparities Research: Protocol for a Bilingual Mixed Methods Measurement Study.

作者信息

Scheim Ayden I, Bauer Greta R, Bastos João L, Poteat Tonia

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 30;10(8):e30987. doi: 10.2196/30987.

DOI:10.2196/30987
PMID:34459747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8438612/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guided by intersectionality frameworks, researchers have documented health disparities at the intersection of multiple axes of social status and position, particularly race and ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. To advance from identifying to intervening in such intersectional health disparities, studies that examine the underlying mechanisms are required. Although much research demonstrates the negative health impacts of perceived discrimination along single axes, quantitative approaches to assessing the role of discrimination in generating intersectional health disparities remain in their infancy. Members of our team recently introduced the Intersectional Discrimination Index (InDI) to address this gap. The InDI comprises three measures of enacted (day-to-day and major) and anticipated discrimination. These attribution-free measures ask about experiences of mistreatment because of who you are. These measures show promise for intersectional health disparities research but require further validation across intersectional groups and languages. In addition, the proposal to remove attributions is controversial, and no direct comparison has ever been conducted.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to cognitively and psychometrically evaluate the InDI in English and Spanish and determine whether attributions should be included.

METHODS

The study will draw on a preliminary validation data set and three original sequentially collected sources of data: qualitative cognitive interviews in English and Spanish with a sample purposively recruited across intersecting social status and position (gender, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, and nativity); a Spanish quantitative survey (n=500; 250/500, 50% sexual and gender minorities); and an English quantitative survey (n=3000), with quota sampling by race and ethnicity (Black, Latino/a/x, and White), sexual or gender minority status, and gender.

RESULTS

The study was funded by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities in May 2021, and data collection began in July 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

The key deliverables of the study will be bilingual measures of anticipated, day-to-day, and major discrimination validated for multiple health disparity populations using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/30987.

摘要

背景

在交叉性框架的指导下,研究人员记录了社会地位和位置的多个轴相交处的健康差异,特别是种族和民族、性别以及性取向。为了从识别这种交叉性健康差异转向对其进行干预,需要开展研究来探究潜在机制。尽管许多研究表明单一轴向上感知到的歧视对健康有负面影响,但评估歧视在导致交叉性健康差异中所起作用的定量方法仍处于起步阶段。我们团队的成员最近引入了交叉性歧视指数(InDI)来填补这一空白。InDI包含三种对实际发生的(日常和重大)以及预期歧视的衡量指标。这些无归因指标询问因你是谁而遭受虐待的经历。这些指标在交叉性健康差异研究中显示出前景,但需要在不同交叉性群体和语言中进一步验证。此外,去除归因的提议存在争议,且从未进行过直接比较。

目的

本研究旨在对英文和西班牙文的InDI进行认知和心理测量评估,并确定是否应纳入归因。

方法

该研究将利用一个初步验证数据集以及三个依次收集的原始数据源:对在社会地位和位置(性别、性取向、种族和民族、社会经济地位、年龄和出生地)交叉领域有目的地招募的样本进行英文和西班牙文的定性认知访谈;一项西班牙文定量调查(n = 500;250/500,50%为性少数和性别少数群体);以及一项英文定量调查(n = 3000),按种族和民族(黑人、拉丁裔/a/x和白人)、性或性别少数群体身份以及性别进行配额抽样。

结果

该研究于2021年5月获得美国国立少数族裔健康与健康差异研究所的资助,并于2021年7月开始数据收集。

结论

该研究的关键成果将是使用定性、定量和混合方法为多个健康差异人群验证的预期、日常和重大歧视的双语测量指标。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):PRR1 - 10.2196/30987。