Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada; Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada; Women's Studies and Feminist Research, Western University, London, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
Although intersectional approaches have gained traction in population health research, quantitative discrimination and health studies have tended to focus on a single axis of discrimination (e.g., racism, homophobia). As few discrimination measures function across multiple social identities or positions, we developed the Intersectional Discrimination Index (InDI) for intercategorical intersectionality research, including measures of Anticipated (InDI-A), Day-to-Day (InDI-D), and Major (InDI-M) discrimination that do not require attribution to particular grounds.
We conducted a validity and reliability study with 2016 online survey panel data from Canada and the United States (n = 2583). Internal consistency and dimensionality of the InDI-A were evaluated with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Construct validation included known-groups comparisons, associations with psychological distress, and convergence with existing discrimination measures. Test-retest reliability was examined in a subgroup (n = 150).
We found support for use of the InDI-A as a unidimensional scale. As hypothesized, racial and sexual/gender minorities reported higher frequencies of all discrimination types (all p < 0.001), and discrimination varied across intersectional categories. Each InDI component was significantly positively associated with psychological distress after controlling for potential confounders. Frequency scores were strongly positively correlated with existing scales. Intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability of anticipated, lifetime day-to-day, and lifetime major discrimination ranged from 0.70 to 0.72.
Final InDI measures include the 9-item InDI-A, 9-item InDI-D, and 13-item InDI-M, for which we have found initial evidence of construct validity and reliability. In combination with sociodemographic information, the InDI measures can be used to evaluate the role of discrimination as a mediator of intersectional health inequalities, and to monitor the prevalence and impacts of discrimination in heterogeneous populations.
尽管交叉方法在人群健康研究中得到了关注,但定量歧视和健康研究往往侧重于单一的歧视轴(例如,种族主义、恐同症)。由于很少有歧视措施能够跨越多个社会身份或地位,因此我们开发了交叉歧视指数(InDI),用于跨类别交叉性研究,包括预期(InDI-A)、日常(InDI-D)和主要(InDI-M)歧视措施,这些措施不需要归因于特定的理由。
我们使用加拿大和美国的 2016 年在线调查面板数据进行了一项有效性和可靠性研究(n=2583)。使用探索性和验证性因子分析评估 InDI-A 的内部一致性和维度。结构验证包括与已知群体的比较、与心理困扰的关联以及与现有歧视措施的收敛性。在一个亚组(n=150)中检查了重测信度。
我们发现支持将 InDI-A 用作单一维度的量表。正如假设的那样,种族和性/性别少数群体报告了所有歧视类型的更高频率(所有 p<0.001),并且歧视在交叉类别中有所不同。在控制潜在混杂因素后,每个 InDI 成分与心理困扰显著正相关。频率得分与现有量表高度正相关。预期、终生日常和终生主要歧视的测试-重测信度的组内相关系数范围为 0.70 至 0.72。
最终的 InDI 测量包括 9 项 InDI-A、9 项 InDI-D 和 13 项 InDI-M,我们已经发现了这些测量方法具有结构有效性和可靠性的初步证据。与社会人口统计学信息相结合,InDI 测量可以用于评估歧视作为交叉健康不平等的中介作用,并监测异质人群中歧视的流行率和影响。