Department for Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig Research Centre for Early Child Development & Department for Early Child Development and Culture, Faculty of Education, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Evol Anthropol. 2022 Jan;31(1):30-44. doi: 10.1002/evan.21923. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
In the past four decades, the term social tolerance has been utilized to describe, explain, and predict many different aspects of primates' sociality and has been measured with a large range of traits and behaviors. To date, however, there has been little discussion on whether these different phenomena all reflect one and the same construct. This paper opens the discussion by presenting the historical development of the term social tolerance and a structured overview of its current, overextended use. We argue that social tolerance has developed to describe two distinct concepts: social tolerance as the social structure of a group and social tolerance as the dyadic or group-level manifestation of tolerant behaviors. We highlight how these two concepts are based on conflicting theoretical understandings and practical assessments. In conclusion, we present suggestions for future research on primate social tolerance, which will allow for a more systematic and comparable investigation of primate sociality.
在过去的四十年中,术语“社会宽容”被用来描述、解释和预测灵长类动物社会行为的许多不同方面,并且已经用大量的特征和行为进行了衡量。然而,迄今为止,对于这些不同的现象是否都反映了同一结构,几乎没有进行讨论。本文通过展示术语“社会宽容”的历史发展和对其当前过度使用的结构化概述,开启了这一讨论。我们认为,社会宽容已经发展到可以描述两个不同的概念:作为群体社会结构的社会宽容和作为宽容行为的对偶或群体层面表现的社会宽容。我们强调了这两个概念是基于相互冲突的理论理解和实际评估。最后,我们提出了未来关于灵长类动物社会宽容的研究建议,这将有助于对灵长类动物社会行为进行更系统和可比的研究。