Suppr超能文献

三种工具评估儿科重症监护病房护理工作量的比较。

Comparison of nursing workload in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit estimated by three instruments.

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Pampa, Uruguaiana, RS, Brazil.

Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Pós-Graduação em Nutrição Materno Infantil, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021 Aug 27;55:e00547. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2020-0547. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the nursing workload using the Nursing Activities Score (NAS), Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) and Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS) instruments in children admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in a university hospital.

METHOD

A prospective cohort study performed in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, with a sample formed of all children hospitalized during the study period. Nursing workload was evaluated using the TISS-28, NEMS and NAS instruments, and further divided into two groups: Group 1 forming a category of basic activities items and Group 2 forming a category of other support and intervention activities.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 490 Pediatric Intensive Care Unit admissions, totaling 4617 observations. NAS presented the best estimate of total working hours. TISS-28 and NEMS showed better agreement and the results showed strong correlations between NAS and TISS-28 and between NEMS and TISS-28. In Group 1 (basic activities), NAS(1) and TISS-28(1) showed moderate correlation, in Group 2 (specialized activities) the three instruments showed strong correlations.

CONCLUSION

NAS stood out in the evaluation of nursing workload and showed good correlation and agreement with the TISS-28.

摘要

目的

比较使用护理活动评分(NAS)、治疗干预评分系统-28(TISS-28)和 9 个等效护理人力使用评分(NEMS)工具评估在大学附属医院儿科重症监护病房(PICU)住院的儿童的护理工作量。

方法

在儿科重症监护病房进行前瞻性队列研究,样本由研究期间住院的所有儿童组成。使用 TISS-28、NEMS 和 NAS 工具评估护理工作量,并进一步分为两组:第 1 组为基本活动项目类别,第 2 组为其他支持和干预活动类别。

结果

样本包括 490 例儿科重症监护病房入院,共 4617 次观察。NAS 对总工作时间的估计最好。TISS-28 和 NEMS 显示出更好的一致性,结果表明 NAS 与 TISS-28 之间以及 NEMS 与 TISS-28 之间具有很强的相关性。在第 1 组(基本活动)中,NAS(1)和 TISS-28(1)显示出中度相关性,在第 2 组(专门活动)中,三个工具显示出很强的相关性。

结论

NAS 在护理工作量评估中表现出色,与 TISS-28 具有良好的相关性和一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验