文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) deputized to informal caregivers: Go or no go?

作者信息

Ho Bach Van, van de Rijt Liza J M, Weijenberg Roxane A F, van der Maarel-Wierink Claar D, Lobbezoo Frank

机构信息

Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Oral Medicine, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Feb;8(1):76-83. doi: 10.1002/cre2.481. Epub 2021 Aug 30.


DOI:10.1002/cre2.481
PMID:34463048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8874087/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Investigating the usability of the Dutch version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT-NL) with informal caregivers of community-dwelling older people with suspected dementia, without specific training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In accordance with guidelines for establishing the cultural equivalency of instruments, the OHAT was translated into Dutch. Fifteen informal caregivers of community-dwelling older people with suspected dementia and, as a reference standard, a dentist assessed the oral health of the older people using the OHAT-NL. The caregivers' scores were compared with the dentist's scores. The usability of the OHAT-NL was rated on a 10-point scale (0 = incomprehensible, and 10 = very user friendly) and investigated further through short structured interviews. RESULTS: There were differences between the dentist's and caregivers' assessments of the individual categories of the OHAT-NL. The specificity of the need to visit an oral health care professional was 100.0%, while the sensitivity was 78.6%. The informal caregivers concluded that the tool made them more aware of different aspects of oral health. The tool was rated with a mean score of 7.7 (SD 1.7). CONCLUSION: The OHAT-NL could be a useful tool for informal caregivers without specific training to indicate whether the person they care for should visit an oral health care professional.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) deputized to informal caregivers: Go or no go?

Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022-2

[2]
The Dutch version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool: Translation and inter-rater reliability among community nurses.

Int J Dent Hyg. 2024-2

[3]
Development of a German version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool.

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019-3-7

[4]
The oral health assessment tool--validity and reliability.

Aust Dent J. 2005-9

[5]
Practitioners' identification of informal caregivers' difficulties with activities of daily living interventions for older people with dementia in Japan.

Psychogeriatrics. 2021-7

[6]
Effectiveness of professional oral health care intervention on the oral health of residents with dementia in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review protocol.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-10

[7]
Positive aspects of care in informal caregivers of community-dwelling dementia patients.

J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020-8

[8]
Psychiatric morbidity and its correlates among informal caregivers of older adults.

Compr Psychiatry. 2016-4-28

[9]
[The oral care practices and needs of older adults in nursing homes: Assessment of carers and patients].

Sante Publique. 2023-12-1

[10]
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008

引用本文的文献

[1]
Antimicrobial Effects of Formulations of Various Nanoparticles and Calcium Hydroxide as Intra-canal Medications Against Enterococcus faecalis: A Systematic Review.

Cureus. 2024-9-28

[2]
The Efficacy of Aloe vera Against Enterococcus faecalis as an Intracanal Medicament: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cureus. 2024-9-25

[3]
Comparing approaches to determining poor oral health among older adults in a national survey.

Gerodontology. 2024-12

[4]
A comprehensive assessment of oral health, swallowing difficulty, and nutritional status in older nursing home residents.

Sci Rep. 2023-11-14

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effectiveness of the implementation project 'Don't forget the mouth!' of community dwelling older people with dementia: a prospective longitudinal single-blind multicentre study protocol (DFTM!).

BMC Oral Health. 2019-5-28

[2]
Oral health care for patients with Alzheimer's disease: An update.

Spec Care Dentist. 2019-5

[3]
Development of a German version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool.

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019-3-7

[4]
Psychometric evaluation of the Orofacial Pain Scale for Non-Verbal Individuals as a screening tool for orofacial pain in people with dementia.

Gerodontology. 2018-4-29

[5]
Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults.

PLoS One. 2018-1-2

[6]
Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis.

J Clin Diagn Res. 2016-10

[7]
Oral health and orofacial pain in older people with dementia: a systematic review with focus on dental hard tissues.

Clin Oral Investig. 2017-1

[8]
[TOPICS-MDS: a versatile resource for generating scientific and social knowledge for elderly care].

Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2015-4

[9]
Pain, agitation, and behavioural problems in people with dementia admitted to general hospital wards: a longitudinal cohort study.

Pain. 2015-4

[10]
Dental care utilization among older adults with cognitive impairment in the USA.

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索