• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症相关内容和社交媒体平台影响年轻成年癌症护理者在社交媒体上获得的社会支持。

Cancer content and social media platform influence young adult cancer caregivers' social support on social media.

作者信息

Warner Echo L, Wilson Andrew, Ellington Lee, Sun Ye, Cloyes Kristin G, Waters Austin R, Nelson Taylor, Kirchhoff Anne C

机构信息

Cancer Control and Population Sciences Research Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

J Psychosoc Oncol. 2022;40(6):808-815. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2021.1968987. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1080/07347332.2021.1968987
PMID:34463191
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine how social media platform and cancer content is associated with the presence of social support in responses to young adult cancer caregivers' (YACC) posts.

DESIGN

We retrospectively collected YACC's Facebook and/or Instagram posts and all responses from the first six months of caregiving.

SAMPLE

Eligible YACC were 18-39, caring for a cancer patient diagnosed 6 months-5 years prior, spoke English, and used social media weekly.

METHODS

Social media posts and responses were manually coded for five social support types, then transformed to depict the proportion of responses per post representing each type of support. Using mixed-effects models, we compared the distributions of responses with social support types by platform (Facebook vs. Instagram) and cancer content (no vs. yes).

FINDINGS

More responses contained emotional support on Instagram than Facebook (B = 0.25, Standard Error (SE)=0.09, p = 0.007). More responses with cancer content contained -validation support (B = 0.20, SE = 0.07, p = 0.002), but fewer contained emotional (B=-0.17, SE = 0.07, p = 0.02) and instrumental support (B=-0.06, SE = 0.02, p = 0.001) than posts without cancer content.

CONCLUSIONS

Studying the responsiveness of social media followers by platform and cancer content provides a foundation for intervention development.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS

Emphasizing the suitability of different social media platforms for particular support seeking behaviors is essential.

摘要

目的

确定社交媒体平台及癌症相关内容与年轻成年癌症护理者(YACC)帖子回应中社会支持的存在如何相关。

设计

我们回顾性收集了YACC在脸书和/或照片墙的帖子以及护理最初六个月内的所有回应。

样本

符合条件的YACC年龄在18 - 39岁之间,照顾6个月至5年前被诊断出癌症的患者,说英语,且每周使用社交媒体。

方法

对社交媒体帖子及回应进行人工编码,分为五种社会支持类型,然后转化以描述每个帖子中代表每种支持类型的回应比例。使用混合效应模型,我们比较了不同平台(脸书与照片墙)和癌症相关内容(无与有)的回应与社会支持类型的分布情况。

结果

照片墙上包含情感支持的回应比脸书上更多(B = 0.25,标准误(SE)= 0.09,p = 0.007)。有癌症相关内容的回应中包含确认支持的更多(B = 0.20,SE = 0.07,p = 0.002),但与无癌症相关内容的帖子相比,包含情感支持(B = -0.17,SE = 0.07,p = 0.02)和工具性支持(B = -0.06,SE = 0.02,p = 0.001)的更少。

结论

按平台和癌症相关内容研究社交媒体关注者的反应性为干预发展提供了基础。

对心理社会服务提供者的启示

强调不同社交媒体平台对特定求助行为的适用性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Cancer content and social media platform influence young adult cancer caregivers' social support on social media.癌症相关内容和社交媒体平台影响年轻成年癌症护理者在社交媒体上获得的社会支持。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2022;40(6):808-815. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2021.1968987. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
2
Misalignment of social support in the social media posts of young adult cancer caregivers.社交媒体中青年癌症照护者发布内容中的社会支持错位。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Feb;7(2):e1998. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1998.
3
Social support enactments on social media during the first 6 months of young adult cancer caregiving.社交媒体上年轻人癌症照料者前 6 个月的社会支持表现。
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Feb;16(1):61-72. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01004-y. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Young adult cancer caregivers' use of social media for social support.青年癌症患者照顾者使用社交媒体寻求社会支持的情况。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jul;29(7):1185-1192. doi: 10.1002/pon.5402. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Examining the Influence on Perceptions of Endometriosis via Analysis of Social Media Posts: Cross-sectional Study.通过社交媒体帖子分析探讨对子宫内膜异位症认知的影响:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 18;6(3):e31135. doi: 10.2196/31135.
6
Acquisition of Social Support and Linguistic Characteristics of Social Media Posts About Young Adult Cancer.获取社会支持和社交媒体帖子中关于青年癌症的语言特征。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018 Apr;7(2):196-203. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0076. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
7
Cancer Communication on Social Media: Examining How Cancer Caregivers Use Facebook for Cancer-Related Communication.社交媒体上的癌症交流:探究癌症护理者如何利用脸书进行与癌症相关的交流。
Cancer Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;40(4):332-338. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000418.
8
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Information on Instagram: Content Analysis.Instagram 上的暴露前预防(PrEP)信息:内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jul 27;7(7):e23876. doi: 10.2196/23876.
9
What People "Like": Analysis of Social Media Strategies Used by Food Industry Brands, Lifestyle Brands, and Health Promotion Organizations on Facebook and Instagram.人们“喜欢”的内容:对食品行业品牌、生活方式品牌以及健康促进组织在脸书和照片墙上使用的社交媒体策略的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 14;20(6):e10227. doi: 10.2196/10227.
10
Online social support for cancer caregivers: alignment between requests and offers on CaringBridge.癌症护理者的在线社交支持:CaringBridge 上的请求与提供之间的一致性。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(1):118-134. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1806174. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Misalignment of social support in the social media posts of young adult cancer caregivers.社交媒体中青年癌症照护者发布内容中的社会支持错位。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Feb;7(2):e1998. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1998.