• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)基线亚组的评估,德谷胰岛素扩展剂量范围的降糖疗效:AWARD-11 的事后分析。

Glycaemic efficacy of an expanded dose range of dulaglutide according to baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) subgroup: Post hoc analysis of AWARD-11.

机构信息

National Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.

University and University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Dec;23(12):2819-2824. doi: 10.1111/dom.14533. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1111/dom.14533
PMID:34463420
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9292947/
Abstract

The AWARD-11 trial demonstrated the safety and efficacy of dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg compared to dulaglutide 1.5 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. This post hoc analysis examined the change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and proportions of patients achieving HbA1c <7% at weeks 36 and 52 with dulaglutide 1.5 mg, 3.0 mg or 4.5 mg across clinically relevant baseline HbA1c subgroups (<8%; 8.0% to < 9.0%; 9.0% to < 10%; and ≥ 10%). Mean reductions in HbA1c were observed across all baseline HbA1c subgroups at 36 weeks (range of HbA1c change: 1.5 mg: -1.0% to -2.2%; 3.0 mg: -1.2% to -2.5%; and 4.5 mg: -1.2% to -3.2%). More patients randomized to 3.0 mg or 4.5 mg (vs. 1.5 mg) achieved HbA1c <7% at 36 weeks regardless of baseline HbA1c; the difference in proportions was greater at higher baseline HbA1c (P-interaction = 0.096). Similar patterns in glycaemic improvement and proportions achieving HbA1c <7% were observed at 52 weeks. Hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal adverse events were similar among the HbA1c subgroups. Glycaemic control was improved with dulaglutide dose escalation from 1.5 mg to 3.0 mg or 4.5 mg across baseline HbA1c subgroups (<8%; 8.0% to < 9.0%; 9.0% to < 10%; and ≥ 10%).

摘要

AWARD-11 试验表明,与 1.5mg 相比,在二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,度拉鲁肽 3.0mg 和 4.5mg 具有安全性和疗效。这项事后分析检查了基线时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化,以及在基线 HbA1c 相关亚组(<8%;8.0%至<9.0%;9.0%至<10%;≥10%)中,度拉鲁肽 1.5mg、3.0mg 或 4.5mg 在第 36 周和第 52 周时达到 HbA1c<7%的患者比例。在所有基线 HbA1c 亚组中,在第 36 周时观察到 HbA1c 的平均降低(HbA1c 变化范围:1.5mg:-1.0%至-2.2%;3.0mg:-1.2%至-2.5%;和 4.5mg:-1.2%至-3.2%)。与 1.5mg 相比,更多随机接受 3.0mg 或 4.5mg(与 1.5mg)的患者在第 36 周时达到 HbA1c<7%;在较高的基线 HbA1c 时,差异更大(P 交互作用=0.096)。在第 52 周时,也观察到类似的血糖改善模式和达到 HbA1c<7%的比例。在 HbA1c 亚组中,低血糖和胃肠道不良事件相似。在整个基线 HbA1c 亚组中,随着度拉鲁肽剂量从 1.5mg 增加到 3.0mg 或 4.5mg,血糖控制得到改善(<8%;8.0%至<9.0%;9.0%至<10%;和≥10%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d047/9292947/15a368ab7783/DOM-23-2819-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d047/9292947/15a368ab7783/DOM-23-2819-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d047/9292947/15a368ab7783/DOM-23-2819-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Glycaemic efficacy of an expanded dose range of dulaglutide according to baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) subgroup: Post hoc analysis of AWARD-11.基于糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)基线亚组的评估,德谷胰岛素扩展剂量范围的降糖疗效:AWARD-11 的事后分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Dec;23(12):2819-2824. doi: 10.1111/dom.14533. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
2
Effect of once-weekly dulaglutide on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose in patient subpopulations by gender, duration of diabetes and baseline HbA1c.每周一次度拉鲁肽对不同性别、糖尿病病程和基线 HbA1c 的患者亚组的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和空腹血糖的影响。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):409-418. doi: 10.1111/dom.13086. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
3
Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.每周一次度拉鲁肽对比每日一次利拉鲁肽治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者(AWARD-6):一项随机、开放标签、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2014 Oct 11;384(9951):1349-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60976-4. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
4
Glycaemic control, body weight, and safety of tirzepatide versus dulaglutide by baseline glycated haemoglobin level in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the SURPASS J-mono study.在日本2型糖尿病患者中,根据基线糖化血红蛋白水平比较替尔泊肽与度拉糖肽的血糖控制、体重及安全性:SURPASS J-单药研究的亚组分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Jan;26(1):126-134. doi: 10.1111/dom.15296. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
5
Dulaglutide 1.5 mg as an add-on option for patients uncontrolled on insulin: Subgroup analysis by age, duration of diabetes and baseline glycated haemoglobin concentration.度拉鲁肽 1.5 毫克作为胰岛素控制不佳患者的附加选择:按年龄、糖尿病病程和基线糖化血红蛋白浓度分组的亚组分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jun;20(6):1461-1469. doi: 10.1111/dom.13252. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
6
Efficacy and safety of subgroup analysis stratified by baseline HbA1c in a Japanese phase 3 study of dulaglutide 0.75 mg compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.在一项日本3期研究中,按基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)分层的亚组分析评估度拉糖肽0.75 mg与甘精胰岛素相比在2型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。
Endocr J. 2017 Dec 28;64(12):1165-1172. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0189. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
7
Effect of once-weekly dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in people with type 2 diabetes and different baseline glycaemic patterns: A post hoc analysis of the AWARD-2 clinical trial.AWARD-2 临床试验的事后分析:每周一次度拉鲁肽对比甘精胰岛素在不同基线血糖模式的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Nov;21(11):2570-2575. doi: 10.1111/dom.13844. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
8
Efficacy and safety of LY3298176, a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled phase 2 trial.LY3298176,一种新型双重 GIP 和 GLP-1 受体激动剂,在 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、安慰剂对照和阳性对照药物对照的 2 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2180-2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32260-8. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
9
A 24-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide added on to glimepiride in type 2 diabetes (AWARD-8).一项为期24周的研究,旨在评估在2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次度拉鲁肽联合格列美脲的疗效和安全性(AWARD-8)。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 May;18(5):475-82. doi: 10.1111/dom.12634. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Versus Dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-11).在一项随机对照试验(AWARD-11)中,接受二甲双胍治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者使用 3.0mg 和 4.5mg 度拉鲁肽与 1.5mg 度拉鲁肽的疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):765-773. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1473. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A study of factors influencing long-term glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes: a structural equation modeling approach.一项影响 2 型糖尿病患者长期血糖变异性因素的研究:结构方程建模方法。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 31;14:1216897. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1216897. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Versus Dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-11).在一项随机对照试验(AWARD-11)中,接受二甲双胍治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者使用 3.0mg 和 4.5mg 度拉鲁肽与 1.5mg 度拉鲁肽的疗效和安全性。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):765-773. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1473. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Real-world clinical outcomes following treatment intensification with GLP-1 RA, OADs or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes on two oral agents (PATHWAY 2-OADs).在使用两种口服药物治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,GLP-1RA、OAD 或胰岛素强化治疗的真实世界临床结局(PATHWAY 2-OADs)。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Dec;8(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001830.
3
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S111-S124. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S009.
4
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S73-S84. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S006.
5
Clinical and economic outcomes among injection-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes initiating dulaglutide compared with basal insulin in a US real-world setting: the DISPEL Study.在真实世界环境中,与基础胰岛素相比,初治 2 型糖尿病患者接受度拉鲁肽治疗的临床和经济结局:DISPEL 研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Dec 9;7(1):e000884. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000884. eCollection 2019.
6
Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)的共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖的管理。
Diabetologia. 2018 Dec;61(12):2461-2498. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5.
7
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes treatment: are they all the same?胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂在 2 型糖尿病治疗中的应用:它们都一样吗?
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Jan;35(1):e3070. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3070. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
8
Effect of once-weekly dulaglutide on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose in patient subpopulations by gender, duration of diabetes and baseline HbA1c.每周一次度拉鲁肽对不同性别、糖尿病病程和基线 HbA1c 的患者亚组的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和空腹血糖的影响。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):409-418. doi: 10.1111/dom.13086. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Predictors of efficacy of GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review.GLP-1 激动剂和 DPP-4 抑制剂疗效的预测因素:系统评价。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Nov;121:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
10
CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM--2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.美国临床内分泌医师协会和美国内分泌学会关于2型糖尿病综合管理算法的共识声明——2016年执行摘要
Endocr Pract. 2016 Jan;22(1):84-113. doi: 10.4158/EP151126.CS.