• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在综合急救部门对婴儿和儿童进行安全有效的程序性镇静的 15 年经验。

Fifteen Years' Experience With Safe and Effective Procedural Sedation in Infants and Children in a General Emergency Department.

机构信息

From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University.

School of Pharmacy, Ohio State University, Columbus.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Sep 1;37(9):e500-e506. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002513.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000002513
PMID:34463665
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate procedural sedation (PS) in infants/children, performed by emergency physicians in a general (nonpediatric) emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Procedural sedation prospectively recorded on a standardized form over 15 years. Demographics, sedatives, and analgesia associations with adverse events were explored with logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Of 3274 consecutive PS, 1177 were pediatric: 2 months to 21 years, mean age (±SD) 8.7 ± 5.2 years, 63% boys, 717 White, 435 Black, 25 other. Eight hundred and seventy were American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 1, 256 ASA 2, 39 ASA 3, 11 ASA 4, 1 ASA 5. Procedural sedation indications are as follows: fracture reduction (n = 649), dislocation reduction (n = 114), suturing/wound care (n = 244), lumbar puncture (n = 49), incision and drainage (n = 37), foreign body removal (n = 28), other (n = 56). Sedatives were ketamine (n = 762), propofol ( = 354), benzodiazepines (n = 157), etomidate (n = 39), barbiturates (n = 39). There were 47.4% that received an intravenous opioid. Success rate was 100%. Side effects included nausea/vomiting, itching/rash, emergence reaction, myoclonus, paradoxical reaction, cough, hiccups. Complications were oxygen desaturation less than 90%, bradypnea respiratory rate less than 8, apnea, tachypnea, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia. Normal range of vital signs was age-dependent. Seventy-four PS (6.3%) resulted in a side effect and 8 PS (3.2%) a complication. No one died, required hospital admission, intubation, or any invasive procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events in infants/children undergoing PS in a general ED are low and comparable to a pediatric ED at a children's hospital. Pediatric PS can be done safely and effectively in a general ED by nonpediatric EM physicians for a wide array of procedures.

摘要

目的

评估由急诊医师在普通(非儿科)急诊室进行的婴儿/儿童程序性镇静(PS)。

方法

15 年来,前瞻性地在标准化表格上记录 PS。使用逻辑回归探讨了与不良事件相关的人口统计学、镇静剂和镇痛剂。

结果

在连续 3274 例 PS 中,有 1177 例为儿科:2 个月至 21 岁,平均年龄(±SD)8.7±5.2 岁,63%为男性,717 例为白人,435 例为黑人,25 例为其他种族。870 例为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)1 级,256 例为 ASA 2 级,39 例为 ASA 3 级,11 例为 ASA 4 级,1 例为 ASA 5 级。PS 的适应证如下:骨折复位(n=649)、脱位复位(n=114)、缝合/伤口护理(n=244)、腰椎穿刺(n=49)、切开引流(n=37)、异物取出(n=28)、其他(n=56)。镇静剂为氯胺酮(n=762)、异丙酚(n=354)、苯二氮䓬类(n=157)、依托咪酯(n=39)、巴比妥类(n=39)。有 47.4%的患儿接受了静脉阿片类药物。成功率为 100%。不良反应包括恶心/呕吐、瘙痒/皮疹、苏醒反应、肌阵挛、矛盾反应、咳嗽、呃逆。并发症包括氧饱和度低于 90%、呼吸频率低于 8 次/分、呼吸暂停、呼吸急促、低血压、高血压、心动过缓、心动过速。生命体征的正常范围与年龄有关。74 例 PS(6.3%)出现不良反应,8 例 PS(3.2%)出现并发症。无死亡、住院、插管或任何有创操作。

结论

在普通 ED 中接受 PS 的婴儿/儿童的不良事件发生率较低,与儿童医院的儿科 ED 相当。非儿科急诊医师可为广泛的操作在普通 ED 中安全有效地进行儿科 PS。

相似文献

1
Fifteen Years' Experience With Safe and Effective Procedural Sedation in Infants and Children in a General Emergency Department.在综合急救部门对婴儿和儿童进行安全有效的程序性镇静的 15 年经验。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Sep 1;37(9):e500-e506. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002513.
2
Safe and efficacious use of procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in a pediatric emergency department.非麻醉医生在儿科急诊科安全有效地使用程序性镇静和镇痛。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1090-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1090.
3
Randomized clinical trial of etomidate versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department.急诊科依托咪酯与丙泊酚用于程序镇静的随机临床试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;49(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.042. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
4
Propofol for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a tale of three centers.丙泊酚用于急诊科程序性镇静和镇痛:三个中心的故事
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):24-30. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.011. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
5
Intravenous etomidate for procedural sedation in emergency department patients.急诊科患者程序性镇静中静脉注射依托咪酯。
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;8(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00539.x.
6
Procedural sedation of critically ill patients in the emergency department.急诊科危重症患者的程序性镇静
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(2):124-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.054.
7
Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科程序性镇静和镇痛的不良事件
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):483-91. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)80050-x.
8
Emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: A Canadian Community Effectiveness and Safety Study (ACCESS).急诊科程序性镇静与镇痛:一项加拿大社区有效性与安全性研究(ACCESS)
CJEM. 2006 Mar;8(2):94-9. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500013531.
9
Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a prospective study.丙泊酚用于急诊科程序性镇静和镇痛的疗效、安全性及患者满意度:一项前瞻性研究。
CJEM. 2007 Nov;9(6):421-7. doi: 10.1017/s148180350001544x.
10
Is higher ASA class associated with an increased incidence of adverse events during procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department?在儿科急诊科进行程序性镇静期间,较高的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级是否与不良事件发生率增加相关?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Oct;25(10):661-4. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e3181bec7cc.