Zed Peter J, Abu-Laban Riyad B, Chan Winnie W Y, Harrison David W
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapuetic Specialist-Emergency Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
CJEM. 2007 Nov;9(6):421-7. doi: 10.1017/s148180350001544x.
We evaluated the efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction with the use of propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department (ED).
All patients receiving propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the ED between December 1, 2003, and November 30, 2005, were prospectively assessed. Propofol was administered using a standardized protocol, which included an initial dose of 0.25-0.5 mg/kg followed by 10-20 mg/minute until sedated. Efficacy was evaluated using procedural success rate, recovery time and physician satisfaction. Adverse respiratory effects were defined as apnea for more than 30 seconds or an oxygen saturation of less than 90%. Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg or > 20% decrease from baseline. Patient and physician satisfaction were determined using 5-point Likert scales.
Our study included 113 patients with a mean age of 50 (standard deviation [SD] 19) years; 62% were male. The most common procedures were orthopedic manipulation (44%), cardioversion (37%), and abscess incision and drainage (13%). The mean total propofol dose required was 1.6 (SD 0.9) mg/kg. Procedural success was achieved in 90% of cases and the mean patient recovery time was 7.6 (SD 3.4) minutes. No patient (0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-3%) experienced apnea; however, 1 patient (1%, 95% CI 0%-5%) experienced emesis, which resulted in an oxygen saturation < 90%. Nine patients (8%, 95% CI 4%-15%) experienced hypotension and 7 (6%, 95% CI 3%-12%) experienced pain on injection. All patients were very satisfied (92%, 95% CI 85%-96%) or satisfied (8%, 95% CI 4%-15%), and 94% (95% CI 88%-98%) reported no recollection of the procedure. The majority of physicians were very satisfied (85%, 95% CI 77%-91%) or satisfied (6%, 95% CI 3%-12%) with the sedation and the conditions achieved.
When administered as part of a standardized protocol, propofol appears to be a safe and effective agent for performing procedural sedation and analgesia in the ED, and is associated with high patient and physician satisfaction.
我们评估了丙泊酚用于急诊科(ED)程序性镇静和镇痛的疗效、安全性及患者满意度。
对2003年12月1日至2005年11月30日期间在ED接受丙泊酚进行程序性镇静和镇痛的所有患者进行前瞻性评估。丙泊酚按照标准化方案给药,初始剂量为0.25 - 0.5mg/kg,随后以10 - 20mg/分钟的速度给药直至达到镇静效果。使用操作成功率、恢复时间和医生满意度评估疗效。不良呼吸效应定义为呼吸暂停超过30秒或氧饱和度低于90%。低血压定义为收缩压<90mmHg或较基线下降>20%。使用5分制李克特量表确定患者和医生的满意度。
我们的研究纳入了113例患者,平均年龄50(标准差[SD]19)岁;62%为男性。最常见的操作是骨科手法复位(44%)、心脏复律(37%)和脓肿切开引流(13%)。所需丙泊酚的平均总剂量为1.6(SD 0.9)mg/kg。90%的病例操作成功,患者平均恢复时间为7.6(SD 3.4)分钟。无患者(0%,95%置信区间[CI]0% - 3%)出现呼吸暂停;然而,1例患者(1%,95%CI 0% - 5%)出现呕吐,导致氧饱和度<90%。9例患者(8%,95%CI 4% - 15%)出现低血压,7例(6%,95%CI 3% - 12%)注射时出现疼痛。所有患者非常满意(92%,95%CI 85% - 96%)或满意(8%,95%CI 4% - 15%),94%(95%CI 88% - 98%)表示对操作无记忆。大多数医生对镇静效果和所达到的条件非常满意(85%,95%CI 77% - 91%)或满意(6%,95%CI 3% - 12%)。
当作为标准化方案的一部分给药时,丙泊酚似乎是在ED进行程序性镇静和镇痛的一种安全有效的药物,且患者和医生满意度较高。