Suppr超能文献

在儿科急诊科进行程序性镇静期间,较高的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级是否与不良事件发生率增加相关?

Is higher ASA class associated with an increased incidence of adverse events during procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department?

作者信息

Caperell Kerry, Pitetti Raymond

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Oct;25(10):661-4. doi: 10.1097/pec.0b013e3181bec7cc.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively investigate whether American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, as assigned by nonanesthesiologists, is associated with adverse events during procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database of children aged 0 to 21 years undergoing procedural sedation in the emergency department of an urban, tertiary care, children's hospital was retrospectively reviewed. This database included clinical and demographic characteristics, including assigned ASA class. It also included information relative to the procedure, the sedation, and any complications related to the sedation. Complications were defined a priori as persistent oxygen desaturation to less than 93% on pulse oximetry requiring supplemental oxygen, bronchospasm, dizziness, apnea, seizure, hiccoughs, laryngospasm, stridor, arrhythmia, hypotension, rash, vomiting, aspiration, or a disinhibition/agitation/dysphoria emergence reaction. Main outcome measure was the incidence of complications relative to ASA class.

RESULTS

Procedural sedation was performed in the emergency department 1232 times during the study period; 30 sedations did not have either ASA class or occurrence of a complication recorded. Thus, 1202 sedations were included in the study. Nine hundred eighty-eight patients were classified as ASA class 1, whereas 214 were classified as ASA class 2 or greater. There were a total of 215 adverse events in the study population. Most of these were hypoxia (185 total) and were more likely to occur in patients with an ASA class 2 or greater (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events during procedural sedation are more common in patients with higher ASA class.

摘要

目的

前瞻性调查由非麻醉医师指定的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级是否与儿科急诊科程序性镇静期间的不良事件相关。

方法

回顾性分析一个前瞻性收集的数据库,该数据库涵盖了一家城市三级儿童医院急诊科中接受程序性镇静的0至21岁儿童。该数据库包括临床和人口统计学特征,包括指定的ASA分级。它还包括与操作、镇静以及任何与镇静相关的并发症的信息。并发症被预先定义为脉搏血氧饱和度持续低于93%且需要补充氧气、支气管痉挛、头晕、呼吸暂停、癫痫发作、打嗝、喉痉挛、喘鸣、心律失常、低血压、皮疹、呕吐、误吸或脱抑制/激动/烦躁不安的苏醒反应。主要结局指标是相对于ASA分级的并发症发生率。

结果

在研究期间,急诊科共进行了1232次程序性镇静;30次镇静未记录ASA分级或并发症发生情况。因此,1202次镇静被纳入研究。988例患者被分类为ASA 1级,而214例被分类为ASA 2级或更高。研究人群中共有215例不良事件。其中大多数是缺氧(共185例),并且更有可能发生在ASA 2级或更高的患者中(P = 0.021)。

结论

程序性镇静期间的不良事件在ASA分级较高的患者中更常见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验