Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstraße 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Jun;32(2):407-418. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01079-1. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
Randomized controlled trials have challenged the assumption that reperfusion success after mechanical thrombectomy varies depending on the retrieval techniques applied; however, recent analyses have suggested that acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients showing susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) may respond differently. We aimed to compare different stent retriever (SR)-based thrombectomy techniques with respect to interventional outcome parameters depending on SVS status.
We retrospectively reviewed 497 patients treated with SR-based thrombectomy for anterior circulation AIS. Imaging was conducted using a 1.5 T or 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Logistic regression analyses were performed to test for the interaction of SVS status and first-line retrieval technique. Results are shown as percentages, total values or adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
An SVS was present in 87.9% (n = 437) of patients. First-line SR thrombectomy was used to treat 293 patients, whereas 204 patients were treated with a combined approach (COA) of SR and distal aspiration. An additional balloon-guide catheter (BGC) was used in 273 SR-treated (93.2%) and 89 COA-treated (43.6%) patients. On logistic regression analysis, the interaction variable of SVS status and first-line retrieval technique was not associated with first-pass reperfusion (aOR 1.736, 95% CI 0.491-6.136; p = 0.392), overall reperfusion (aOR 3.173, 95% CI 0.752-13.387; p = 0.116), periinterventional complications, embolization into new territories, or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. The use of BGC did not affect the results.
While previous analyses indicated that first-line SR thrombectomy may promise higher rates of reperfusion than contact aspiration in AIS patients with SVS, our data show no superiority of any particular SR-based retrieval technique regardless of SVS status.
随机对照试验对机械取栓后再灌注成功取决于所应用的取栓技术这一假设提出了挑战;然而,最近的分析表明,显示易损血管征(susceptibility vessel sign,SVS)的急性缺血性卒中(acute ischemic stroke,AIS)患者可能有不同的反应。我们旨在比较不同的支架取栓(stent retriever,SR)技术基于 SVS 状态的介入治疗结果参数。
我们回顾性分析了 497 例采用 SR 取栓治疗前循环 AIS 的患者。使用 1.5T 或 3T 磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)扫描仪进行成像。采用逻辑回归分析来检验 SVS 状态和一线取栓技术之间的相互作用。结果以百分比、总数或调整后的优势比(adjusted odds ratio,aOR)和 95%置信区间(95% confidence intervals,95%CI)表示。
87.9%(n=437)的患者存在 SVS。一线 SR 取栓治疗 293 例,联合 SR 和远端抽吸治疗 204 例。273 例 SR 治疗(93.2%)和 89 例 COA 治疗(43.6%)患者中使用了附加球囊导引导管(balloon-guide catheter,BGC)。逻辑回归分析显示,SVS 状态和一线取栓技术的交互变量与首次通过再灌注(aOR 1.736,95%CI 0.491-6.136;p=0.392)、总体再灌注(aOR 3.173,95%CI 0.752-13.387;p=0.116)、围手术期并发症、栓塞至新区域或症状性颅内出血无关。BGC 的使用并不影响结果。
虽然之前的分析表明,与接触抽吸相比,一线 SR 取栓在 SVS 的 AIS 患者中可能有更高的再灌注率,但我们的数据显示,无论 SVS 状态如何,任何特定的基于 SR 的取栓技术都没有优势。