• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架取栓器部署追踪易损病变血管征在 M1 闭塞取栓中预测有效首次再通。

Stent Retriever Deployment Tracing Susceptibility Vessel Sign in the M2 Branch Predicts the Effective First-Pass Reperfusion in Thrombectomy for M1 Occlusion.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Center, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery and Stroke Center, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;187:e485-e493. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.113. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.113
PMID:38677642
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Successful first-pass reperfusion is associated with better functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke, but its treatment strategies remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients who underwent MT for M1 occlusion between December 2020 and May 2023 at our institution. The locations of susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on magnetic resonance imaging were classified into M1 only, M1 to single M2 branch, or M1 to both M2 branches. Patients were included in the SVS tracing group when the stent retriever of the first pass covered the entire SVS length. Successful reperfusion was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale 2b-3. Any intracranial hemorrhage detected at 24-hour postoperatively was included as a hemorrhagic complication.

RESULTS

The SVS was detected in M1 only, M1 to single M2 branch, and M1 to both M2 branches in 8, 22, and 4 patients, respectively. Among the 34 patients, 27 were included in the SVS-tracing group. Successful first-pass reperfusion was significantly more frequent in the SVS-tracing group compared with the non-SVS tracing group (odds ratio, 14.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.0 - 101; P = 0.007). The procedural time was significantly reduced in the SVS tracing group (median, 29 [interquartile range, 22 - 49] minute vs. 63 [43 - 106] minute; P = 0.043). There was a trend toward less frequent hemorrhagic complications in the SVS tracing group (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.029 - 1.0; P = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a thrombus imaging-based MT strategy to efficiently achieve first-pass reperfusion in M1 occlusion.

摘要

背景与目的

机械取栓(MT)治疗急性缺血性脑卒中后,首次再通与更好的功能结局相关,但治疗策略仍不明确。

材料与方法

我们回顾性招募了 2020 年 12 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在我院接受 M1 闭塞 MT 的患者。磁共振成像上的易损血管征(SVS)位置分为 M1 段、M1 至单一支 M2 分支、或 M1 至两支 M2 分支。当首次通过的支架取栓器覆盖整个 SVS 长度时,患者被纳入 SVS 追踪组。成功再通定义为改良脑梗死溶栓分级 2b-3 级。术后 24 小时内检测到的任何颅内出血均被视为出血并发症。

结果

8 例患者的 SVS 仅位于 M1 段,22 例患者的 SVS 位于 M1 至单一支 M2 分支,4 例患者的 SVS 位于 M1 至两支 M2 分支。34 例患者中,27 例纳入 SVS 追踪组。与非 SVS 追踪组相比,SVS 追踪组首次通过再通更频繁(优势比,14.4;95%置信区间,2.0-101;P=0.007)。SVS 追踪组的手术时间明显缩短(中位数,29 [四分位距 22-49] 分钟 vs. 63 [43-106] 分钟;P=0.043)。SVS 追踪组出血并发症的频率也有降低的趋势(优势比,0.17;95%置信区间,0.029-1.0;P=0.052)。

结论

本研究提供了一种基于血栓成像的 MT 策略,可有效实现 M1 闭塞的首次再通。

相似文献

1
Stent Retriever Deployment Tracing Susceptibility Vessel Sign in the M2 Branch Predicts the Effective First-Pass Reperfusion in Thrombectomy for M1 Occlusion.支架取栓器部署追踪易损病变血管征在 M1 闭塞取栓中预测有效首次再通。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;187:e485-e493. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.113. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
2
Influence of Microcatheter Position on First-pass Success of Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.微导管位置对急性缺血性脑卒中血栓切除术初次通成功的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146:e708-e713. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.173. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
3
Mechanical Thrombectomy for Isolated M2 Occlusions: A Post Hoc Analysis of the STAR, SWIFT, and SWIFT PRIME Studies.孤立性M2段闭塞的机械取栓术:STAR、SWIFT及SWIFT PRIME研究的事后分析
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Apr;37(4):667-72. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4591. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
4
Tortuosity of middle cerebral artery M1 segment and outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy.大脑中动脉 M1 段迂曲与机械取栓术后结局的关系。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Apr;30(2):154-162. doi: 10.1177/15910199221104922. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
5
First-Pass Reperfusion by Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute M1 Occlusion: The Size of Retriever Matters.急性M1闭塞时机械取栓的首次通过再灌注:取栓装置的尺寸很重要。
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 22;12:679402. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.679402. eCollection 2021.
6
Mechanical thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: influence of reperfusion on clinical outcome and impact of the first-line strategy (ADAPT vs stent retriever).基底动脉闭塞机械取栓:再通对临床结局的影响以及一线策略(ADAPT 与支架取栓)的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 1;129(6):1482-1491. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.JNS171043. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Stent-retriever characteristics and strategies associated with recanalization in thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.取栓支架的特点和策略与急性缺血性脑卒中取栓治疗中的再通相关。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;242:108332. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108332. Epub 2024 May 23.
8
Stent-retriever alone vs. aspiration and stent-retriever combination in large vessel occlusion stroke: A matched analysis.单纯取栓支架与抽吸和取栓支架联合治疗大动脉闭塞性卒中的匹配分析。
Int J Stroke. 2022 Apr;17(4):465-473. doi: 10.1177/17474930211019204. Epub 2021 May 27.
9
Stent-Based Retrieval Techniques in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with and Without Susceptibility Vessel Sign.有和无易损血管征的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的基于支架的取栓技术。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Jun;32(2):407-418. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01079-1. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
10
Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the large-format pRESET 6-50 thrombectomy stent-retriever in the endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke: real-world experiences from two tertiary comprehensive stroke centers.大型pRESET 6-50血栓切除术取栓支架在缺血性卒中血管内治疗中的有效性和安全性评估:来自两个三级综合卒中中心的真实世界经验
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 17;14:1256365. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1256365. eCollection 2023.