Guettler Norbert, Sammito Stefan
German Air Force Centre of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen, Medical Clinic I, Giessen, Germany.
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 Aug 31;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00327-x.
A resting electrocardiogram (ECG) is a well-tolerated, non-invasive, and inexpensive test for overt electrical signs of cardiac pathology and is widely used in the screening of aircrew and other high-hazard occupations. Given the low number of pathological results leading to disqualification or restriction however, there is an ongoing debate as to how often screening ECGs should be performed in different age groups.
We restrospectively analyzed 8275 resting 12-lead ECGs registered between 2007 and 2020 in the German Air Force Centre of Aerospace Medicine. Findings were categorized according to consensus recommendations published by the NATO Working Group on Occupational Cardiology in Military Aircrew, based on ECG screening criteria published for athletes which were used at the time of registration. Age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index of the probands were also captured. Additionally, 4839 pilot and non-pilot aircrew members were analyzed longitudinally over a maximum period of 13.4 years.
Out of all the ECGs only 18 revealed findings requiring further investigation, and only one individual was temporarily disqualified because of a ventricular pre-excitation (delta wave) as a sign of an antegrade conducting accessory pathway. The longitudinal analysis of 25,829 ECGs revealed 28 abnormalities requiring further investigation, and only two ECG findings (in probands aged 48.8 and 59.1 years) led to temporary, or permanent disqualification. In a third case, the ECG showed signs of a myocardial infarction, which was already known from the proband's history.
Initial ECG screening for asymptomatic aircrew revealed extremely low numbers of individuals requiring further investigation in our cohort. This would appear to justify an initial screening ECG and follow-up ECGs at certain intervals starting at a certain age, but routine ECG screening of applicants in professions with a higher risk tolerance or frequent, e.g. annual, follow-up ECGs in younger aircrew is not supported by our data because of the minimal yield of ECG findings requiring further investigation.
静息心电图(ECG)是一种耐受性良好、非侵入性且价格低廉的检查,用于检测心脏病理的明显电信号,广泛应用于机组人员和其他高风险职业的筛查。然而,由于导致不合格或受限的病理结果数量较少,关于不同年龄组应多久进行一次心电图筛查仍存在争议。
我们回顾性分析了2007年至2020年在德国空军航空航天医学中心登记的8275份静息12导联心电图。根据北约军事机组人员职业心脏病学工作组发布的共识建议,基于登记时使用的运动员心电图筛查标准对结果进行分类。还记录了受试者的年龄、性别、身高、体重和体重指数。此外,对4839名飞行员和非飞行员机组人员进行了长达13.4年的纵向分析。
在所有心电图中,只有18份显示需要进一步检查的结果,只有一名个体因心室预激(δ波)作为顺行传导旁路的迹象而被暂时取消资格。对25829份心电图的纵向分析显示有28例异常需要进一步检查,只有两份心电图结果(受试者年龄分别为48.8岁和59.1岁)导致暂时或永久取消资格。在第三个病例中,心电图显示有心肌梗死迹象,这从受试者病史中已知。
对无症状机组人员进行的初始心电图筛查显示,我们队列中需要进一步检查的个体数量极低。这似乎证明了在一定年龄开始进行初始心电图筛查并定期进行后续心电图检查是合理的,但我们的数据不支持对风险耐受性较高或频繁进行检查的职业申请人进行常规心电图筛查,例如对年轻机组人员进行年度后续心电图检查,因为需要进一步检查的心电图结果产出极少。