• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门(TaTME)与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:早期和长期结局的倾向评分匹配分析。

Transanal (TaTME) vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of early and long-term outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, via Tesserete 46, Lugano, 6900, Switzerland.

Department of Surgery, Beata Vergine Hospital, Via Alfonso Turconi 23, Mendrisio, 6850, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2271-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04019-0. Epub 2021 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-021-04019-0
PMID:34467413
Abstract

PURPOSE

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has been proposed as an alternative to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME) in distal rectal tumors. Despite encouraging reports, mid- and long-term oncological results are limited. In this study, we aimed at comparing TaTME versus LapTME in patients with mid and low rectal cancer.

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2019, all patients undergoing either TaTME or LapTME for rectal adenocarcinoma ≤ 12 cm from the anal verge were included. Demographic, clinical, and follow-up data were retrieved from a prospective and audited database, and a propensity score-matched analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were included, 38 underwent TaTME, and 106 LapTME. The median age was 68.0 (60.2-75.8) years, and 96 (66.7%) patients were male. Median follow-up was 30.6 (20.2-39.8) months in the TaTME group and 49.5 (22.6-68.5) months in the LapTME group. There was one (2.6%) local recurrence in the TaTME group and two (1.9%) in the LapTME group (p = 0.788). There was no difference in the 3-year disease-free survival between groups both in the primary (93% vs. 86%, p = 0.274) and the propensity score-matched analyses (93% vs. 81%, p = 0.132). Conversion to open surgery was less frequent in the TaTME group (none vs. 4 (11.4%), p = 0.041). Intra- and postoperative complications, length of stay, specimen quality, and resection margins were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, TaTME was associated with a less frequent conversion to open surgery but otherwise had similar post-operative results compared to LapTME. Local recurrence and 3-year survival rates were similar.

摘要

目的

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)已被提议作为远端直肠肿瘤腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(LapTME)的替代方法。尽管有令人鼓舞的报道,但中、长期肿瘤学结果是有限的。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较 TaTME 与 LapTME 在中低位直肠腺癌患者中的疗效。

方法

从 2012 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,所有接受 TaTME 或 LapTME 治疗肛缘距离直肠腺癌≤12cm 的患者均纳入研究。从一个前瞻性和审核的数据库中获取人口统计学、临床和随访数据,并进行倾向评分匹配分析。

结果

共纳入 144 例患者,其中 38 例行 TaTME,106 例行 LapTME。中位年龄为 68.0(60.2-75.8)岁,96 例(66.7%)为男性。TaTME 组的中位随访时间为 30.6(20.2-39.8)个月,LapTME 组为 49.5(22.6-68.5)个月。TaTME 组有 1 例(2.6%)局部复发,LapTME 组有 2 例(1.9%)(p=0.788)。两组患者在原发肿瘤(93% vs. 86%,p=0.274)和倾向评分匹配分析(93% vs. 81%,p=0.132)中的 3 年无病生存率无差异。TaTME 组中转开腹手术的频率较低(0 例 vs. 4 例(11.4%),p=0.041)。术中及术后并发症、住院时间、标本质量和切缘均无差异。

结论

根据我们的经验,与 LapTME 相比,TaTME 更不容易转为开腹手术,但术后结果相似。局部复发率和 3 年生存率相似。

相似文献

1
Transanal (TaTME) vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of early and long-term outcomes.经肛门(TaTME)与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:早期和长期结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2271-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04019-0. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
2
Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与 MRI 定义低位直肠癌的腹腔镜 TME 比较:基于倾向评分匹配的肿瘤学结局分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2459-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Three-Year Nationwide Experience with Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer in the Netherlands: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision.荷兰经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的三年全国经验:与传统腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Mar;228(3):235-244.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
5
Transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a comparative study of long-term oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术:长期肿瘤学结果的比较研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Apr;26(4):279-290. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02570-8. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Short-term outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门和腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术后的短期结局
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Apr;20(4):227-34. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1421-3. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
7
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
8
Three-year outcome after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter comparative analysis.局部进展期直肠癌经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的 3 年疗效比较:一项多中心对比分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07171-y.
9
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Comparative Prospective Clinical Trial from Two Centers.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术:来自两个中心的比较性前瞻性临床试验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jul;30(7):769-776. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0828. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期临床疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;42(12):1841-1850. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of matched cohort studies.经肛门与腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的疗效:匹配队列研究的荟萃分析与试验序贯分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12121-5.
2
Safety and efficacy of flexible articulated instrument (ArtiSential) in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.柔性关节器械(ArtiSential)在直肠癌腹腔镜手术中的安全性和有效性。
BMC Surg. 2025 May 2;25(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02841-9.
3
Does transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) result in better quality of life and functional outcomes than traditional TME does? A retrospective propensity score-adjusted cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
The learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is associated with local recurrence: results from a multicentre external audit.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的学习曲线与局部复发相关:来自多中心外部审核的结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Aug;23(8):2020-2029. doi: 10.1111/codi.15722. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
2
The learning curve of TaTME for mid-low rectal cancer: a comprehensive analysis from a five-year institutional experience.TaTME 治疗中低位直肠癌的学习曲线:来自五年机构经验的综合分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6190-6200. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08115-0. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
3
Local recurrence after local excision of early rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of completion TME, adjuvant (chemo)radiation, or no additional treatment.
经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)在生活质量和功能结局方面是否比传统全直肠系膜切除术(TME)更好?一项倾向评分调整的回顾性队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Apr 30;410(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03724-6.
4
Is survival after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) worse than that after traditional total mesorectal excision? A retrospective propensity score-adjusted cohort study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)后的生存率是否低于传统全直肠系膜切除术后的生存率?一项回顾性倾向评分调整队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Feb 20;39(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04591-7.
5
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jan 26;103(4):e36859. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036859.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.微创全直肠系膜切除术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 12;13:1167200. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1167200. eCollection 2023.
7
Transanal down-to-up dissection of the distal rectum as a viable approach to achieve total mesorectal excision in laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer near the anus: a study of short- and long-term outcomes of 123 consecutive patients from a single Japanese institution.经肛门由下至上游离远端直肠以实现肛门附近直肠癌腹腔镜保肛手术中全直肠系膜切除术:来自日本单中心的 123 例连续患者的短期和长期结果研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov 15;20(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02826-5.
8
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Lower Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的倾向评分匹配分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;14(17):4098. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174098.
局部切除早期直肠癌后的局部复发:全直肠系膜切除术、辅助(放)化疗或不追加治疗的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2020 Dec;107(13):1719-1730. doi: 10.1002/bjs.12040. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
4
The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision.英国和爱尔兰结直肠外科学会建议对经肛门全直肠系膜切除术进行反思。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;22(7):745-748. doi: 10.1111/codi.15143.
5
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway.挪威暂停经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):121-130. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11459. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
Total mesorectal excision for low and middle rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus transanal approach-a meta-analysis.直肠系膜全切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:腹腔镜与经肛门入路的比较——一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3908-3919. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07160-8. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
7
Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.经肛门直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门手术的系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):59-68. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003227.
8
Three-Year Nationwide Experience with Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer in the Netherlands: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision.荷兰经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的三年全国经验:与传统腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Mar;228(3):235-244.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
9
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)与 MRI 定义低位直肠癌的腹腔镜 TME 比较:基于倾向评分匹配的肿瘤学结局分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2459-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6530-4. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Noninferiority Meta-analysis of Quality of Surgical Resection Outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术的比较:手术切除结果质量的非劣效性荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 May;269(5):849-855. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003072.