• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估中东欧国家的可持续能源发展并分析其多样性。

Assessing sustainable energy development in the central and eastern European countries and analyzing its diversity.

机构信息

Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 20;801:149745. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149745. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149745
PMID:34467916
Abstract

The growing social awareness of environmental protection entails that the assumptions of the sustainable development idea are being implemented in various economic sectors at an increasingly fast pace. One of them is the power industry, the sustainable development of which is now becoming a priority in economic policy for many countries. The paper refers to this issue by developing methodology for both studying and assessing the level of sustainable energy development in the Central and Eastern European Countries. The study involved 21 indicators characterizing the sustainable energy development of these countries in the areas of energy, environmental, economic, and social security for 2008 and 2018. When considering the complexity of the subject matter and the wide scope of the research, four methods of multi-criteria data analysis (TOPSIS, VIKOR, MOORA and COPRAS) were used. For each of them, based on the adopted criteria, synthetic indicators were determined, which allowed for the assessment of the level of sustainable energy development in the CEE countries. Weights for the adopted indicators were identified based on the Shanon's Entropy method. Afterwards, an unambiguous assessment of the level of sustainable energy development of the CEE countries was performed. The results showed that in 2008 and 2018, the best ranking position was held by Latvia and Croatia, and the worst ranking position was held by Poland and Bulgaria. The method of multidimensional scaling made it possible to determine the positions of studied countries on scatter plots in two-dimensional space, which showed differences between individual CEE countries. All in all, the applied methods allowed for a considerably broad assessment of the level of sustainable energy development of the CEE countries.

摘要

环境保护的社会意识日益增强,这意味着可持续发展理念的假设正在各个经济领域以越来越快的速度得到实施。其中之一是电力行业,其可持续发展现在成为许多国家经济政策的优先事项。本文通过开发用于研究和评估中东欧国家可持续能源发展水平的方法来解决这个问题。该研究涉及 2008 年和 2018 年 21 个指标,这些指标描述了这些国家在能源、环境、经济和社会安全领域的可持续能源发展情况。考虑到主题的复杂性和研究范围的广泛,使用了四种多准则数据分析方法(TOPSIS、VIKOR、MOORA 和 COPRAS)。对于每种方法,根据采用的标准,确定了综合指标,这使得可以评估中东欧国家的可持续能源发展水平。根据香农熵方法确定了所采用指标的权重。然后,对中东欧国家可持续能源发展水平进行了明确评估。结果表明,2008 年和 2018 年,拉脱维亚和克罗地亚的排名最高,波兰和保加利亚的排名最低。多维尺度分析方法使我们能够在二维空间的散点图上确定研究国家的位置,从而显示了各个中东欧国家之间的差异。总的来说,所采用的方法使得对中东欧国家可持续能源发展水平进行相当广泛的评估成为可能。

相似文献

1
Assessing sustainable energy development in the central and eastern European countries and analyzing its diversity.评估中东欧国家的可持续能源发展并分析其多样性。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 20;801:149745. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149745. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
2
Assessing the level of digital maturity of enterprises in the Central and Eastern European countries using the MCDM and Shannon's entropy methods.采用多准则决策(MCDM)和香农熵方法评估中东欧国家企业的数字化成熟度。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 6;16(7):e0253965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253965. eCollection 2021.
3
A novel Pythagorean fuzzy-SWARA-TOPSIS framework for evaluating the EU progress towards sustainable energy development.用于评估欧盟在可持续能源发展方面进展的新型毕达哥拉斯模糊 SWARA-TOPSIS 框架。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Dec 22;194(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09685-9.
4
The nexus between financial development, globalization, and environmental degradation: Fresh evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries.金融发展、全球化与环境恶化之间的关系:来自中东欧国家的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(24):24733-24747. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05714-w. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
5
Sustainability energy security: 20 years assessment of the West African Nations using a comprehensive entropy-TOPSIS analysis.可持续能源安全:使用综合熵-TOPSIS 分析对西非国家进行 20 年评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(33):81093-81112. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28116-5. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
6
Integrating Social Dimensions into Future Sustainable Energy Supply Networks.将社会维度纳入未来可持续能源供应网络。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;17(17):6230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176230.
7
Renewable energy consumption and economic growth. Causality relationship in Central and Eastern European countries.可再生能源消费与经济增长。中东欧国家的因果关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 8;13(10):e0202951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202951. eCollection 2018.
8
Use of biologics for psoriasis in Central and Eastern European countries.中东欧国家使用生物制剂治疗银屑病。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Nov;29(11):2222-30. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13222. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Health technology assessment in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria.波兰、捷克共和国、匈牙利、罗马尼亚和保加利亚的卫生技术评估。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 May;15 Suppl 1:S13-25. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0590-8. Epub 2014 May 16.
10
Pharmaceutical Regulation in Central and Eastern European Countries: A Current Review.中东欧国家的药品监管:当前综述
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Dec 18;8:892. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00892. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing sustainability on the modern Silk Road: An objective weighting methodological approach.评估现代丝绸之路的可持续性:一种客观加权方法。
PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0324538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324538. eCollection 2025.
2
Do R&D intensity and capacity utilisation matter for SMEs' innovations within the CEE region? Testing moderating roles of different ownership structures.研发强度和产能利用率对中东欧地区中小企业的创新有影响吗?检验不同所有制结构的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 12;19(1):e0296873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296873. eCollection 2024.
3
Post COVID-19 ENERGY sustainability and carbon emissions neutrality.
新冠疫情后的能源可持续性与碳排放中和
Energy (Oxf). 2022 Feb 15;241:122801. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122801. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
4
Evaluation on the implementation effect of public participation in the decision-making of NIMBY facilities.公众参与邻避设施决策的实施效果评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 18;17(2):e0263842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263842. eCollection 2022.