• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当自动驾驶系统出现故障时的用户体验和可用性:来自现场实验的发现。

User experience and usability when the automated driving system fails: Findings from a field experiment.

机构信息

Center for Psychological Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, PR China.

School of Information Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710064, PR China.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Oct;161:106383. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106383. Epub 2021 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106383
PMID:34469855
Abstract

We are entering an era of automated vehicles (AVs), which has potential to improve road safety considerably. A compelling user experience is crucial to AV adoption in the future commercial market. The automated driving system (ADS) that replaces human drivers should be perceived as very useful before the latter are willing to give up their control and entrust their lives to the ADS. However, compared with the growing number of studies on public acceptance of AVs, there has been limited research focusing on user experience and usability. We examined AV and ADS user experience and usability, ADS failures' influence on them, and their influences on re-riding willingness. We conducted a field study using a real AV and a large-scale test track. We invited participants (N = 261) to travel in the AV as passengers in a low-speed environment. Participants were randomly assigned into the normal condition or the fault condition (its participants were exposed to an ADS failure). We measured participants' positive experience (feeling relaxed, safe, and comfortable) and negative experience (feeling tense and risky) while riding in the AV and perceived usability of the ADS based on the System Usability Scale. In both conditions, participants reported moderate positive experience and perceived usability but a relatively high level of willingness to ride in our AV again. The ADS failure reduced positive experience and perceived usability, and it increased negative experience. Positive experience and perceived usability, but not negative experience, influenced re-riding willingness. Compared with male participants, female participants reported less positive experience and lower perceived usability. We discuss implications of our results as well as limitations of this research.

摘要

我们正在进入自动驾驶汽车(AV)的时代,这有潜力极大地提高道路安全。在未来的商业市场中,引人入胜的用户体验对于自动驾驶汽车的采用至关重要。取代人类驾驶员的自动驾驶系统(ADS)应该在后者愿意放弃控制权并将其生命托付给 ADS 之前被认为是非常有用的。然而,与越来越多的关于公众对自动驾驶汽车接受度的研究相比,关注用户体验和可用性的研究相对较少。我们研究了自动驾驶汽车和 ADS 的用户体验和可用性、ADS 故障对它们的影响,以及它们对再次乘车意愿的影响。我们使用真实的自动驾驶汽车和大型测试轨道进行了现场研究。我们邀请了 261 名参与者作为乘客在低速环境中乘坐自动驾驶汽车。参与者被随机分配到正常条件或故障条件(其参与者暴露于 ADS 故障)下。我们根据系统可用性量表衡量了参与者在乘坐自动驾驶汽车时的积极体验(感到放松、安全和舒适)和消极体验(感到紧张和有风险),以及对 ADS 的可用性感知。在两种情况下,参与者报告了中等程度的积极体验和可感知的可用性,但再次乘坐我们的自动驾驶汽车的意愿相对较高。ADS 故障降低了积极体验和可感知的可用性,并增加了消极体验。积极体验和可感知的可用性,但不是消极体验,影响了再次乘车的意愿。与男性参与者相比,女性参与者报告的积极体验较少,感知可用性较低。我们讨论了我们研究结果的意义以及这项研究的局限性。

相似文献

1
User experience and usability when the automated driving system fails: Findings from a field experiment.当自动驾驶系统出现故障时的用户体验和可用性:来自现场实验的发现。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Oct;161:106383. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106383. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
2
Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.通过动作进行交流——自动驾驶车辆运动在道路瓶颈场景中协商通行权的适用性。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Sep;95:103438. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103438. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
3
Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.自动驾驶汽车中的驾驶员信任、接受和接管行为:自动驾驶风格和驾驶员驾驶风格的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106238. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106238. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
Quantifying the automated vehicle safety performance: A scoping review of the literature, evaluation of methods, and directions for future research.量化自动驾驶汽车的安全性能:文献综述、方法评估及未来研究方向。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:106003. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106003. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Automated Driving System Collisions: Early Lessons.自动驾驶系统碰撞:早期教训。
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):249-259. doi: 10.1177/0018720819872034. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
6
Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.自动驾驶车辆与混合交通的融合:评估跟随人类驾驶车辆性能的变化。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:106006. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106006. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Development and classification of autonomous vehicle's ambiguous driving scenario.自动驾驶车辆模糊驾驶场景的发展与分类
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Jun;200:107501. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107501. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
8
Evidence of automated vehicle safety's influence on people's acceptance of the automated driving technology.自动驾驶汽车安全性对人们接受自动驾驶技术的影响的证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Feb;195:107381. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107381. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
9
User perceptions of automated Truck-Mounted attenuators: Implications on work zone safety.用户对自动车载式减速装置的看法:对工作区安全的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(5):413-418. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1925116. Epub 2021 May 26.
10
Personalizing automated driving speed to enhance user experience and performance in intermediate-level automated driving.个性化自动驾驶速度,提升中级自动驾驶用户体验和性能。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 May;199:107512. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107512. Epub 2024 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting sources of anger in automated driving: driving-related and external factor.检测自动驾驶中的愤怒来源:与驾驶相关的因素和外部因素。
Front Neuroergon. 2025 May 9;6:1548861. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1548861. eCollection 2025.