• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

fbst:一个 R 包,用于全贝叶斯显著性检验,通过 e 值对尖锐零假设与其备择假设进行检验。

fbst: An R package for the Full Bayesian Significance Test for testing a sharp null hypothesis against its alternative via the e value.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, University of Siegen, Walter-Flex-Street 3, 57072, Siegen, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1114-1130. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01613-6. Epub 2021 Sep 1.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-021-01613-6
PMID:34471963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9170675/
Abstract

Hypothesis testing is a central statistical method in psychology and the cognitive sciences. However, the problems of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) and p values have been debated widely, but few attractive alternatives exist. This article introduces the fbst R package, which implements the Full Bayesian Significance Test (FBST) to test a sharp null hypothesis against its alternative via the e value. The statistical theory of the FBST has been introduced more than two decades ago and since then the FBST has shown to be a Bayesian alternative to NHST and p values with both theoretical and practical highly appealing properties. The algorithm provided in the fbst package is applicable to any Bayesian model as long as the posterior distribution can be obtained at least numerically. The core function of the package provides the Bayesian evidence against the null hypothesis, the e value. Additionally, p values based on asymptotic arguments can be computed and rich visualizations for communication and interpretation of the results can be produced. Three examples of frequently used statistical procedures in the cognitive sciences are given in this paper, which demonstrate how to apply the FBST in practice using the fbst package. Based on the success of the FBST in statistical science, the fbst package should be of interest to a broad range of researchers and hopefully will encourage researchers to consider the FBST as a possible alternative when conducting hypothesis tests of a sharp null hypothesis.

摘要

假设检验是心理学和认知科学中的一种核心统计方法。然而,关于零假设显著性检验(NHST)和 p 值的问题已经被广泛讨论,但很少有吸引人的替代方案存在。本文介绍了 fbst R 包,它实现了全贝叶斯显著性检验(FBST),通过 e 值来检验尖锐零假设与其替代假设。FBST 的统计理论早在二十多年前就已经提出,从那时起,FBST 已经被证明是 NHST 和 p 值的贝叶斯替代方案,具有理论和实践上都极具吸引力的特性。fbst 包中提供的算法适用于任何贝叶斯模型,只要能够至少通过数值方法获得后验分布。该包的核心功能提供了对零假设的贝叶斯证据,即 e 值。此外,还可以计算基于渐近论点的 p 值,并生成丰富的可视化效果,用于结果的交流和解释。本文给出了认知科学中三个常用统计过程的示例,演示了如何使用 fbst 包在实践中应用 FBST。基于 FBST 在统计学中的成功,fbst 包应该会引起广泛研究人员的兴趣,并希望鼓励研究人员在进行尖锐零假设的假设检验时,将 FBST 作为一种可能的替代方案来考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/49d91b3ed2a3/13428_2021_1613_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/6fb6036a5456/13428_2021_1613_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/0a86af3a4041/13428_2021_1613_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/bc73d59d2f44/13428_2021_1613_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/3c8a8de5f420/13428_2021_1613_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/cec76352fbed/13428_2021_1613_Figd_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/39e79418fe3d/13428_2021_1613_Fige_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/3773558a9b5b/13428_2021_1613_Figh_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/5e37719ad140/13428_2021_1613_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/5bb796419b7b/13428_2021_1613_Figi_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/072c7f2f1a70/13428_2021_1613_Figj_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/500d34ffce3d/13428_2021_1613_Figk_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/4753d3df3732/13428_2021_1613_Figl_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/ba659bcd623e/13428_2021_1613_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/9b4592c85885/13428_2021_1613_Figm_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/b67e813f4fa3/13428_2021_1613_Fign_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/8e3336b7f4bd/13428_2021_1613_Figo_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/ccb03a2c4dcc/13428_2021_1613_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/f728dc48340b/13428_2021_1613_Figp_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/49d91b3ed2a3/13428_2021_1613_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/6fb6036a5456/13428_2021_1613_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/0a86af3a4041/13428_2021_1613_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/bc73d59d2f44/13428_2021_1613_Figc_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/3c8a8de5f420/13428_2021_1613_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/cec76352fbed/13428_2021_1613_Figd_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/39e79418fe3d/13428_2021_1613_Fige_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/3773558a9b5b/13428_2021_1613_Figh_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/5e37719ad140/13428_2021_1613_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/5bb796419b7b/13428_2021_1613_Figi_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/072c7f2f1a70/13428_2021_1613_Figj_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/500d34ffce3d/13428_2021_1613_Figk_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/4753d3df3732/13428_2021_1613_Figl_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/ba659bcd623e/13428_2021_1613_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/9b4592c85885/13428_2021_1613_Figm_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/b67e813f4fa3/13428_2021_1613_Fign_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/8e3336b7f4bd/13428_2021_1613_Figo_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/ccb03a2c4dcc/13428_2021_1613_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/f728dc48340b/13428_2021_1613_Figp_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4d1/9170675/49d91b3ed2a3/13428_2021_1613_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
fbst: An R package for the Full Bayesian Significance Test for testing a sharp null hypothesis against its alternative via the e value.fbst:一个 R 包,用于全贝叶斯显著性检验,通过 e 值对尖锐零假设与其备择假设进行检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1114-1130. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01613-6. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
2
The evidence interval and the Bayesian evidence value: On a unified theory for Bayesian hypothesis testing and interval estimation.证据区间与贝叶斯证据值:关于贝叶斯假设检验与区间估计的统一理论
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022 Nov;75(3):550-592. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12267. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
3
How to Choose between Different Bayesian Posterior Indices for Hypothesis Testing in Practice.在实际的假设检验中,如何在不同的贝叶斯后验指标之间进行选择。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;58(1):160-188. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1967716. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP.精神医学中常见的虚无假设显著性检验的贝叶斯替代方法:使用 JASP 的非技术性指南。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1761-4.
5
Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP.贝叶斯替代零假设检验在生物医学研究中的应用:使用 JASP 进行贝叶斯推理的非技术性介绍
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00980-6.
6
Adaptive Significance Levels in Tests for Linear Regression Models: The -Value and -Value Cases.线性回归模型检验中的自适应显著性水平:p 值和 t 值情形
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;25(1):19. doi: 10.3390/e25010019.
7
Bayesian inference of population prevalence.贝叶斯推断种群流行率。
Elife. 2021 Oct 6;10:e62461. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62461.
8
Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research.贝叶斯霍奇斯-莱曼检验在两样本设置中的统计等效性:生物医学研究中的功效分析、Ⅰ类错误率和等效边界选择。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01341-7.
9
Analysis of Bayesian posterior significance and effect size indices for the two-sample t-test to support reproducible medical research.用于支持可重复医学研究的两样本t检验的贝叶斯后验显著性和效应量指标分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00968-2.
10
An Introduction to Calculating Bayes Factors in JASP for Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.JASP 中用于言语、语言和听觉研究的贝叶斯因子计算简介。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Dec 10;62(12):4523-4533. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-19-0183. Print 2019 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing the false discovery rate of preclinical animal research with Bayesian statistical decision criteria.使用贝叶斯统计决策标准降低临床前动物研究的错误发现率。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Oct;32(10):1880-1901. doi: 10.1177/09622802231184636. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Higher body mass index after intrapartum antibiotic exposure in children persists over 10-years.分娩期抗生素暴露后儿童的体质量指数较高,且持续 10 年以上。
Pediatr Obes. 2023 Jul;18(7):e13035. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.13035. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
3
Bayesian identification of structural coefficients in causal models and the causal false-positive risk of confounders and colliders in linear Markovian models.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis.JASP 进行和报告贝叶斯分析的指南。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):813-826. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5.
3
Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP.贝叶斯替代零假设检验在生物医学研究中的应用:使用 JASP 进行贝叶斯推理的非技术性介绍
贝叶斯因果模型结构系数识别与线性马尔科夫模型中混杂因素和共发因素的因果假阳性风险。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 27;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01473-w.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00980-6.
4
Analysis of Bayesian posterior significance and effect size indices for the two-sample t-test to support reproducible medical research.用于支持可重复医学研究的两样本t检验的贝叶斯后验显著性和效应量指标分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00968-2.
5
Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework.贝叶斯框架下效应存在性和显著性的指标
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767. eCollection 2019.
6
A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing.对零假设贝叶斯检验相关问题的综述。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Dec;24(6):774-795. doi: 10.1037/met0000221. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Redefine statistical significance.重新定义统计学显著性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;2(1):6-10. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.
8
Retire significance, but still test hypotheses.退休有其意义,但仍要检验假设。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7749):461. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00972-7.
9
The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of -values.研究的可重复性与P值的错误解读
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Dec 6;4(12):171085. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171085. eCollection 2017 Dec.
10
Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses.等效性检验:检验、相关性及荟萃分析实用入门指南
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 May;8(4):355-362. doi: 10.1177/1948550617697177. Epub 2017 May 5.