Marina Hodolič, Feldkirchnerstrasse 4, 8054 Graz, Seiersberg, Austria,
Croat Med J. 2021 Aug 31;62(4):310-317. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2021.62.310.
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) and fluoromethyl-(18F)-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl-ammonium chloride (18F-FCH) computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary low-grade gliomas (LGG).
The study enrolled patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suspected LGG. Patients underwent both 18F-FET and 18F-FCH positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. Brain PET-CT was performed according to standard protocol - 20 minutes after intravenous injection of 185 MBq of 18F-FET and 185 MBq of 18F-FCH PET. Surgery and pathohistological diagnosis were performed in the next two weeks.
We observed significantly better concordance between tumor histology and 18F-FET PET (weighted Kappa 0.74) compared with both 18F-FCH (weighted Kappa 0.15) and MRI (weighted Kappa 0.00). Tumor histology was significantly associated with 18F-FET (odds ratio 12.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-333.70; P=0.013, logistic regression analysis). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis comparing 18F-FCH (area under the curve [AUC] 0.625, 95% CI 0.298-0.884) and 18F-FET (AUC 0.833, 95% CI 0.499-0.982) showed better diagnostic properties of 18F-FET (AUC difference 0.208, 95% CI -0.145 to 0.562, P=0.248).
Performing PET-CT in patients with newly diagnosed LGG should be preceded by a selection of an appropriate radiopharmaceutical. 18F-FET seems to be more accurate than 18F-FCH in the LGG diagnosis.
研究 O-(2-[18F]-氟乙基)-L-酪氨酸(18F-FET)和氟甲基-(18F)-二甲基-2-羟乙基-铵氯化物(18F-FCH)计算机断层扫描(CT)在原发性低级别胶质瘤(LGG)患者中的诊断准确性。
本研究纳入了经磁共振成像(MRI)怀疑为 LGG 的患者。患者均接受 18F-FET 和 18F-FCH 正电子发射断层扫描(PET)-CT。脑 PET-CT 是在静脉注射 185MBq 的 18F-FET 和 185MBq 的 18F-FCH PET 后 20 分钟进行的,按照标准方案进行。接下来的两周内进行手术和病理组织学诊断。
我们观察到肿瘤组织学与 18F-FET PET 之间的一致性明显更好(加权 Kappa 0.74),与 18F-FCH(加权 Kappa 0.15)和 MRI(加权 Kappa 0.00)相比。肿瘤组织学与 18F-FET 显著相关(优势比 12.87;95%置信区间[CI],0.49-333.70;P=0.013,逻辑回归分析)。比较 18F-FCH(曲线下面积[AUC]0.625,95%CI0.298-0.884)和 18F-FET(AUC0.833,95%CI0.499-0.982)的受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,18F-FET 的诊断性能更好(AUC 差异 0.208,95%CI-0.145 至 0.562,P=0.248)。
在新诊断的 LGG 患者中进行 PET-CT 前,应选择适当的放射性药物。18F-FET 在 LGG 诊断中似乎比 18F-FCH 更准确。