School of Biomedical Sciences, University of West London, Ealing, UK.
UoN Dementia Research & Innovation Centre, Faculty of Health, Education and Society, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK.
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Nov;26(11):2233-2242. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1969640. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
To examine current UK practice in diagnosis of patients under 65 with young onset dementia, within 5 years of date of diagnosis, identified from electronic health records of 8 NHS mental health trusts.
Patients diagnosed with young onset dementia were assembled from the UK-Clinical Record Interactive System, (UK-CRIS) using diagnosis of dementia as the index date. A pre-designed proforma, derived by international Delphi consensus from experts in the field in previous work, was used to assess components of the diagnostic assessment in 402 electronic health records across 8 NHS sites. Information was extracted on key aspects of clinical and physical examination according to both a minimum and gold standard.
Percentage compliance rates analysed by NHS site and statement, including compliance for site for minimum standard (11 statements), the additional 20 statements required for Gold standard, and the complete Gold standard set (31 statements) show that the additional 20 statements in the Gold standard had consistently higher compliance rates for every site compared to the minimum set.
Findings confirmed variation in clinical practice and identified commonly missed items in examination and enquiry compared to expert consensus. This suggests that a template proforma, which contains the key indicators for comprehensive assessment of dementia in young adults according to a quality standard could help support clinicians to improve record keeping and reduce gaps in knowledge.
在诊断日期后 5 年内,通过对 8 家英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)心理健康信托机构的电子健康记录进行研究,调查英国目前对 65 岁以下早发性痴呆患者的诊断实践情况。
通过使用痴呆症作为索引日期,从英国临床记录交互系统(UK-CRIS)中提取早发性痴呆症患者。采用国际德尔菲共识法,根据该领域专家之前的工作制定了一个预设计的表格,用于评估 8 个 NHS 地点的 402 份电子健康记录中的诊断评估部分。根据最低标准和黄金标准,根据关键方面的临床和体检信息进行提取。
通过 NHS 地点和陈述进行分析的百分比符合率,包括最低标准(11 项陈述)的站点符合率、黄金标准所需的另外 20 项陈述的符合率以及完整的黄金标准集(31 项陈述)的符合率,表明与最低标准相比,黄金标准中的另外 20 项陈述在每个站点的符合率更高。
研究结果证实了临床实践中的差异,并确定了与专家共识相比,在检查和询问中常见的遗漏项目。这表明,根据质量标准,包含全面评估年轻成年人痴呆症的关键指标的模板表格可以帮助支持临床医生改善记录保存并减少知识差距。