• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性肾脏病患者无症状或“沉默性”心肌缺血的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Prevalence of unrecognized or "silent" myocardial ischemia in chronic kidney disease patients: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

University of New York State-University at Albany School of Public Health, Albany, NY, United States of America.

New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256934. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0256934
PMID:34473787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8412314/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are at an extremely high risk of silent myocardial ischemia (SMI). However, there is a dearth of evidence on the worldwide prevalence of this very lethal and yet unrecognizable complication of CKD. The proposed systematic review and meta-analysis aims to estimate the global prevalence of SMI among CKD patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

This protocol was conceived according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. The systematic review will involve all observational studies and clinical trials published until April 30, 2021, and reporting on the prevalence of SMI in CKD patients. Electronic sources including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database of systematic reviews will be perused for potentially eligible studies, restricted to only studies published in English or French. Two investigators will independently select studies and use a pre-pilot tested form to extract data. Further, they will independently perform a qualitative assessment of the risk of bias and overall quality of the selected studies, followed by a quantitative assessment using funnel plots and Egger's tests. The heterogeneity between studies will be assessed with the Cochrane's Q statistic, and the I2 statistic will measure the percentage of variation across studies that is due to their heterogeneity rather than chance; the I2 will decide if a meta-analysis can be conducted. In case it cannot be conducted, a descriptive analysis will be performed. Otherwise, study-specific estimates will be pooled using either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model, depending on the value of the I2 statistic. Subgroup and random effects meta-regression analyses will further investigate the potential sources of heterogeneity. Finally, sensitivity analyses will be performed to measure the impact of low-quality studies on the results of the meta-analysis, and power calculations will determine the probability that we will detect a true effect if it does exist.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020211929.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

The intended systematic review and meta-analysis will fill the knowledge gap on the global prevalence of silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) in CKD patients. The eligible studies will be identified through a methodic literature search followed by a rigorous screening process; we will then use robust meta-analysis tools to pool the data and provide reliable estimates of the global prevalence of SMI in CKD patients. Two major limitations could be: the predominance of clinical trials that might limit the generalizability of the findings, given that some informative patients might have been sidelined by the strict inclusion criteria of these studies; the high probability of type 1 error originating from the important number of subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ebe/8412314/cf93ae8e2c3a/pone.0256934.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ebe/8412314/cf93ae8e2c3a/pone.0256934.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ebe/8412314/cf93ae8e2c3a/pone.0256934.g001.jpg
摘要

简介

慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者发生无症状心肌缺血(SMI)的风险极高。然而,目前关于 CKD 这一极其致命但尚未被识别的并发症在全球的流行情况,证据还很缺乏。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在估计 CKD 患者中 SMI 的全球患病率。

方法和分析

本方案根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)声明制定。该系统评价将包括截至 2021 年 4 月 30 日发表的所有观察性研究和临床试验,并报告 CKD 患者中 SMI 的患病率。电子资源包括 MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库,将对可能符合条件的研究进行检索,仅限于以英文或法文发表的研究。两名研究者将独立选择研究,并使用预试验测试的表格提取数据。此外,他们将独立对所选研究进行风险偏倚的定性评估和整体质量评估,然后使用漏斗图和 Egger 检验进行定量评估。研究间的异质性将用 Cochrane's Q 统计量评估,I2 统计量将衡量研究间变异归因于其异质性而不是偶然因素的百分比;I2 将决定是否可以进行荟萃分析。如果不能进行荟萃分析,则将进行描述性分析。否则,将使用固定效应或随机效应模型汇总研究特异性估计值,具体取决于 I2 统计量的值。亚组和随机效应荟萃回归分析将进一步研究潜在的异质来源。最后,进行敏感性分析以衡量低质量研究对荟萃分析结果的影响,并进行功效计算以确定如果存在真实效果,我们检测到该效果的概率。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020211929。

本研究的优势和局限性

拟议的系统评价和荟萃分析将填补 CKD 患者无症状心肌缺血(SMI)全球患病率方面的知识空白。通过系统的文献检索和严格的筛选过程确定合格的研究;然后,我们将使用稳健的荟萃分析工具汇总数据,并提供 CKD 患者中 SMI 全球患病率的可靠估计值。两个主要的局限性可能是:临床试验的主导地位可能会限制研究结果的普遍性,因为一些有意义的患者可能因这些研究严格的纳入标准而被排除在外;由于大量的亚组和敏感性分析,存在出现 I 类错误的高概率。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of unrecognized or "silent" myocardial ischemia in chronic kidney disease patients: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性肾脏病患者无症状或“沉默性”心肌缺血的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256934. eCollection 2021.
2
Prevalence of asymptomatic or "silent" myocardial ischemia in diabetic patients: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病患者无症状或“沉默”性心肌缺血的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252511. eCollection 2021.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Global, regional, and national prevalence of hepatitis B infection in the general and key populations living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.全球、区域和国家乙型肝炎病毒感染在一般和关键人群中感染 HIV 的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 27;7(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0815-5.
5
Risk of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide deaths in persons with sleep apnea: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.患有睡眠呼吸暂停症的个体出现自杀意念、自杀企图和自杀死亡的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235379. eCollection 2020.
6
MicroRNAs associated with chronic kidney disease in the general population and high-risk subgroups: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.与普通人群和高危亚组人群慢性肾脏病相关的 microRNAs:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):e057500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057500.
7
Global prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.结核病患者中糖尿病的全球患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 9;7(6):e015170. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015170.
8
Prevalence, incidence and associated mortality of cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease in low- and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家慢性肾脏病患者心血管疾病的患病率、发病率及相关死亡率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e016412. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016412.
9
Prevalence of polypharmacy and associated adverse health outcomes in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.患有慢性肾病的成年患者中,多重用药的流行情况及其对健康的不良影响:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 4;10(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01752-z.
10
Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the global HIV-infected population: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.全球感染艾滋病毒人群中慢性阻塞性肺疾病的流行病学:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 29;6(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0467-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between atherosclerosis and the development of multi-organ pathologies.动脉粥样硬化与多器官病变发展之间的关联。
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Dec 23;12:20503121241310013. doi: 10.1177/20503121241310013. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
International consensus definitions of clinical trial outcomes for kidney failure: 2020.2020年肾衰竭临床试验结果的国际共识定义。
Kidney Int. 2020 Oct;98(4):849-859. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.07.013.
2
Nomenclature for Kidney Function and Disease: Executive Summary and Glossary From a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference.肾功能与疾病命名法:来自改善全球肾脏病预后组织(KDIGO)共识会议的执行摘要及术语表
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Jun 15;5(7):965-972. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.03.027. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference.
肾功能与疾病的命名:改善全球肾脏病预后组织(KDIGO)共识会议报告
Kidney Int. 2020 Jun;97(6):1117-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家慢性肾脏病负担,1990-2017 年:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):709-733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.慢性肾脏病与冠状动脉疾病:美国心脏病学会心血管介入治疗学会最新进展综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 8;74(14):1823-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1017.
6
Prevalence and Correlates of Myocardial Scar in a US Cohort.美国队列中心肌瘢痕的患病率及其相关因素
JAMA. 2015 Nov 10;314(18):1945-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.14849.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
8
Statistical models for meta-analysis: A brief tutorial.荟萃分析的统计模型:简要教程。
World J Methodol. 2012 Aug 26;2(4):27-32. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v2.i4.27.
9
Hemodialysis-induced regional left ventricular systolic dysfunction: prevalence, patient and dialysis treatment-related factors, and prognostic significance.血液透析诱导的区域性左心室收缩功能障碍:患病率、患者和透析治疗相关因素及预后意义。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Oct;7(10):1615-23. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00850112. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
10
Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.评估患病率研究中的偏倚风险:现有工具的修改和评价者间一致性的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;65(9):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014. Epub 2012 Jun 27.