School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre of Applied Health Economics and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.
School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre of Applied Health Economics and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Australia; Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Nutrition and Food Service Department, Queensland, Australia; School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Dec;17(12):2065-2080. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.07.020. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of eHealth-delivered interventions for adults who undergo bariatric surgery on postoperative weight loss, weight loss maintenance, eating psychopathology, quality of life, depression screening, and self-efficacy. Six electronic databases were searched, with 14 studies (across 17 reports) included, involving 1633 participants. With substantial heterogeneity, qualitative descriptions have been provided. Interventions were delivered via an online program or internet modules (n = 2), telephone (n = 2), text messages (n = 2), videoconferencing (n = 3), mobile application (n = 1), and audiovisual media (n = 1). Three studies included a combination, including internet modules and telephone (n = 1), wireless fidelity scales, emails, and telephone (n = 1), and a combination of online treatment, weekly emails, and access to a private Facebook group (n = 1). All the eHealth interventions, except for one, implemented behavior change techniques, including self-monitoring, problem solving, social support, goal setting, and shaping knowledge. Both eHealth intervention and control groups lost weight across the included studies, and eHealth was found to be as effective as or more effective than the control for weight loss. Two studies measured weight loss maintenance; both eHealth and control groups regained weight in the longer term. The interventions showed significant improvement on assessment measures for eating psychopathology. In conclusion, when bariatric surgery patients have limited or no access to healthcare teams or require additional support, eHealth may be a suitable option. Future studies implementing eHealth interventions would benefit from reporting intervention components as per the behavior change techniques taxonomy and further consideration of delivering eHealth in a stepped care approach would be beneficial.
本系统评价旨在评估针对接受减重手术的成年人的电子健康干预措施对术后体重减轻、体重维持、饮食病理学、生活质量、抑郁筛查和自我效能的影响。共检索了 6 个电子数据库,纳入了 14 项研究(涉及 17 份报告),共纳入 1633 名参与者。由于存在很大的异质性,因此提供了定性描述。干预措施通过在线程序或互联网模块(n = 2)、电话(n = 2)、短信(n = 2)、视频会议(n = 3)、移动应用(n = 1)和视听媒体(n = 1)进行。有 3 项研究包含组合干预,包括互联网模块和电话(n = 1)、无线保真秤、电子邮件和电话(n = 1),以及在线治疗、每周电子邮件和访问私人 Facebook 群组的组合(n = 1)。除了一项研究之外,所有的电子健康干预措施都实施了行为改变技术,包括自我监测、解决问题、社会支持、设定目标和塑造知识。所有电子健康干预组和对照组在纳入的研究中都减轻了体重,而且电子健康干预与对照组相比在减重方面同样有效或更有效。有 2 项研究测量了体重维持情况;电子健康干预组和对照组在长期内都出现了体重反弹。这些干预措施在饮食病理学评估测量上显示出显著改善。总之,当减重手术患者无法或有限地获得医疗团队的支持,或者需要额外的支持时,电子健康可能是一个合适的选择。未来实施电子健康干预措施的研究将受益于按照行为改变技术分类法报告干预措施组成部分,并进一步考虑采用分级护理方法来提供电子健康。