• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模拟的培训可缩短急性脑卒中救治的流程时间(STREAM)。

Simulation-based training improves process times in acute stroke care (STREAM).

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2022 Jan;29(1):138-148. doi: 10.1111/ene.15093. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

DOI:
10.1111/ene.15093
PMID:34478596
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of the STREAM Trial was to evaluate the effect of simulation training on process times in acute stroke care.

METHODS

The multicenter prospective interventional STREAM Trial was conducted between 10/2017 and 04/2019 at seven tertiary care neurocenters in Germany with a pre- and post-interventional observation phase. We recorded patient characteristics, acute stroke care process times, stroke team composition and simulation experience for consecutive direct-to-center patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT). The intervention consisted of a composite intervention centered around stroke-specific in situ simulation training. Primary outcome measure was the 'door-to-needle' time (DTN) for IVT. Secondary outcome measures included process times of EVT and measures taken to streamline the pre-existing treatment algorithm.

RESULTS

The effect of the STREAM intervention on the process times of all acute stroke operations was neutral. However, secondary analyses showed a DTN reduction of 5 min from 38 min pre-intervention (interquartile range [IQR] 25-43 min) to 33 min (IQR 23-39 min, p = 0.03) post-intervention achieved by simulation-experienced stroke teams. Concerning EVT, we found significantly shorter door-to-groin times in patients who were treated by teams with simulation experience as compared to simulation-naive teams in the post-interventional phase (-21 min, simulation-naive: 95 min, IQR 69-111 vs. simulation-experienced: 74 min, IQR 51-92, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

An intervention combining workflow refinement and simulation-based stroke team training has the potential to improve process times in acute stroke care.

摘要

背景

STREAM 试验的目的是评估模拟培训对急性脑卒中护理过程时间的影响。

方法

这项多中心前瞻性干预性 STREAM 试验于 2017 年 10 月至 2019 年 4 月在德国的 7 个三级神经中心进行,设有预干预和后干预观察阶段。我们记录了连续直接入组接受静脉溶栓(IVT)和/或血管内治疗(EVT)的患者的患者特征、急性脑卒中护理过程时间、脑卒中团队组成和模拟经验。干预措施包括以脑卒中特定原位模拟培训为中心的综合干预。主要结局指标是 IVT 的“门到针”时间(DTN)。次要结局指标包括 EVT 的过程时间和简化现有治疗算法所采取的措施。

结果

STREAM 干预对所有急性脑卒中操作的过程时间的影响是中性的。然而,二次分析显示,模拟经验丰富的脑卒中团队将 DTN 从干预前的 38 分钟(四分位距[IQR] 25-43 分钟)减少到 33 分钟(IQR 23-39 分钟,p=0.03)。关于 EVT,我们发现有模拟经验的团队治疗的患者门到腹股沟的时间明显短于无模拟经验的团队治疗的患者(-21 分钟,无模拟经验:95 分钟,IQR 69-111 与模拟经验:74 分钟,IQR 51-92,p=0.04)。

结论

结合工作流程细化和基于模拟的脑卒中团队培训的干预措施有可能改善急性脑卒中护理的过程时间。

相似文献

1
Simulation-based training improves process times in acute stroke care (STREAM).基于模拟的培训可缩短急性脑卒中救治的流程时间(STREAM)。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Jan;29(1):138-148. doi: 10.1111/ene.15093. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
2
A Network-Wide Stroke Team Program Reduces Time to Treatment for Endovascular Stroke Therapy in a Regional Stroke-Network.一项全网络卒中团队计划缩短了区域卒中网络中血管内卒中治疗的治疗时间。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(3-4):141-148. doi: 10.1159/000487965. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
3
Simulation-Based Training of the Rapid Evaluation and Management of Acute Stroke (STREAM)-A Prospective Single-Arm Multicenter Trial.基于模拟的急性卒中快速评估与管理(STREAM)培训——一项前瞻性单臂多中心试验。
Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 11;10:969. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00969. eCollection 2019.
4
Intravenous Thrombolysis Is Not Associated with Increased Time to Endovascular Treatment.静脉溶栓治疗与血管内治疗时间的延长无关。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(3):321-327. doi: 10.1159/000508898. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
5
Temporal sustainability of guideline based door-to-needle times for intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.基于指南的急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓门到针时间的时间可持续性。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Apr;74:164-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
The association between computed tomography angiography timing and workflow times in patients with acute ischemic stroke.计算机断层血管造影时间与急性缺血性脑卒中患者工作流程时间的关系。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Jul;16(5):534-541. doi: 10.1177/1747493020962236. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Reducing door-to-needle times in stroke thrombolysis to 13 min through protocol revision and simulation training: a quality improvement project in a Norwegian stroke centre.通过修订方案和模拟培训将脑卒中溶栓的门到针时间缩短至 13 分钟:挪威脑卒中中心的一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Nov;28(11):939-948. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009117. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
8
Does clinical experience influence the effects of team simulation training in stroke thrombolysis? A prospective cohort study.临床经验是否会影响脑卒中溶栓团队模拟训练的效果?一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 15;14(7):e086413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086413.
9
Components and Trends in Door to Treatment Times for Endovascular Therapy in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Hospitals.血管内治疗门到治疗时间的指南-卒中医院的组成和趋势。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 8;139(2):169-179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036701.
10
Short Door-to-Needle Times in Acute Ischemic Stroke and Prospective Identification of Its Delaying Factors.急性缺血性卒中的短门-针时间及其延迟因素的前瞻性识别
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2015 Jun 12;5(2):75-83. doi: 10.1159/000432405. eCollection 2015 May-Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Curriculum Innovations: How Real Is Real Enough?: A Pilot Study Comparing Standardized Patients vs Manikin Simulators in a Neurologic Emergencies Training Course.课程创新:多真实才算足够真实?:一项在神经急症培训课程中比较标准化病人与人体模型模拟器的试点研究。
Neurol Educ. 2022 Sep 26;1(1):e200004. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200004. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Impact of multidisciplinary simulation training on endovascular thrombectomy: Workflow, patient outcomes and anaesthetic management.多学科模拟训练对血管内血栓切除术的影响:工作流程、患者结局及麻醉管理
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 17:15910199251336952. doi: 10.1177/15910199251336952.
3
Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for implementing obstetric life support in diverse healthcare contexts throughout Arizona: a mixed methods protocol.
评估在亚利桑那州不同医疗环境中实施产科生命支持的培训师培训方法:一项混合方法方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 15;25(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12739-0.
4
[Acute ischemic stroke treatment].[急性缺血性卒中治疗]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Mar;120(2):120-128. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01233-w. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
5
Reviews in Medical Education: Advances in Simulation to Address New Challenges in Neurology.医学教育评论:模拟技术在应对神经学新挑战方面的进展
Neurol Educ. 2023 Mar 9;2(1):e200042. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200042. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Streamlining Acute Stroke Processes and Data Collection: A Narrative Review.简化急性中风流程与数据收集:一篇叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;12(19):1920. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191920.
7
Curriculum Innovation: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Teamwork-Focused Neurocritical Care In Situ Simulation Training Program.课程创新:以跨学科团队合作 为重点的神经重症护理现场模拟培训项目的设计、实施与评估
Neurol Educ. 2024 Apr 12;3(2):e200128. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200128. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Using Neurology Trainees as Standardized Patients in a Neurological Emergency Simulation Curriculum for Medical Students.在面向医学生的神经急症模拟课程中,将神经科实习生用作标准化病人。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 May 21;34(3):589-599. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02016-w. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Evaluating the effects of simulation training on stroke thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估模拟训练对中风溶栓的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Feb 29;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00283-6.
10
Assessment of novel electrophysiology simulator-a survey study.新型电生理模拟器的评估——一项调查研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Feb 14;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00280-9.