Hanawalt P C
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, CA 94305.
Environ Health Perspect. 1987 Dec;76:9-14. doi: 10.1289/ehp.87769.
Potentially deleterious alterations to DNA occur nonrandomly within the mammalian genome. These alterations include the adducts produced by many chemical carcinogens, but not the UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, which may be an exception. Recent studies in our laboratory have shown that the excision repair of pyrimidine dimers and certain other lesions is nonrandom in the mammalian genome, exhibiting a distinct preference for actively transcribed DNA sequences. An important consequence of this fact is that mutagenesis and carcinogenesis may be determined in part by the activities of the relevant genes. Repair may also be processive, and a model is proposed in which excision repair is coupled to transcription at the nuclear matrix. Similar but freely diffusing repair complexes may account for the lower overall repair efficiencies in the silent domains of the genome. Risk assessment in relation to chemical carcinogenesis requires assays that determine effective levels of DNA damage for producing malignancy. The existence of nonrandom repair in the genome casts into doubt the reliability of overall indicators of DNA binding and lesion repair for such determinations. Furthermore, some apparent differences between the intragenomic repair heterogeneity in rodent cells and that in human cells mandate a reevaluation of rodent test systems for human risk assessment. Tissue-specific and cell-specific differences in the coordinate regulation of gene expression and DNA repair may account for corresponding differences in the carcinogenic response.
DNA的潜在有害改变在哺乳动物基因组内非随机发生。这些改变包括许多化学致癌物产生的加合物,但紫外线诱导的环丁烷嘧啶二聚体可能是个例外。我们实验室最近的研究表明,嘧啶二聚体和某些其他损伤的切除修复在哺乳动物基因组中是非随机的,对活跃转录的DNA序列表现出明显的偏好。这一事实的一个重要后果是,诱变和致癌作用可能部分由相关基因的活性决定。修复也可能是连续的,并且提出了一个模型,其中切除修复在核基质处与转录偶联。类似但自由扩散的修复复合物可能解释了基因组沉默区域较低的总体修复效率。与化学致癌作用相关的风险评估需要测定确定产生恶性肿瘤的有效DNA损伤水平的方法。基因组中存在非随机修复使得用于此类测定的DNA结合和损伤修复总体指标的可靠性受到质疑。此外,啮齿动物细胞和人类细胞基因组内修复异质性之间的一些明显差异要求重新评估用于人类风险评估的啮齿动物测试系统。基因表达和DNA修复的协调调节中的组织特异性和细胞特异性差异可能解释致癌反应中的相应差异。