• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 SYNTAX I、II 和残余评分的手术和经皮血运重建结果:一项长期随访研究。

Surgical and percutaneous revascularization outcomes based on SYNTAX I, II, and residual scores: a long-term follow-up study.

机构信息

Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 3;16(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01616-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-021-01616-6
PMID:34479587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8418036/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of SYNTAX scores I, II, and residual with cardiovascular outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and compare both procedures in a long-term follow-up.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center study from the MASS registry at the Heart Institute of the University of São Paulo, Brazil in which 969 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing CABG (559) or PCI (410) were included. We assessed the SYNTAX scores I, II and residual in both interventions. Clinical endpoints were the first occurrence of a composite of overall death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization (MACCE) and the total occurrence of each component of MACCE.

RESULTS

In the CABG sample, SSI had a median of 23 (IQR 17-29.5), median SSII of 25.4 (IQR 19.2-32.8), and median rSS of 2 (IQR 0-6.5); in PCI SSI had a median of 14 (IQR 10-19.1), median SSII of 28.7 (IQR 23-34.2), and median rSS of 4.7 (IQR 0-9). Total of 174 events were documented and CABG patients had a lower rate of MACCE (15.6% vs. 21.2%; adjusted HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.13-3.47; P = 0.016) and repeat revascularization (3.8% vs. 11.5%; adjusted HR 4.35; CI 95% 1.74-10.85; P = 0.002) compared with PCI. No SYNTAX score tertile found a difference in death rate between procedures. In a multivariate analysis, the rSS was an independent predictor for MACCE (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.06; P = 0.001). Regarding death, the only independent predictors were ejection fraction and renal function.

CONCLUSION

Surgical revascularization resulted in a more complete revascularization and lower rates of major cardiac or cerebrovascular events in a long-term follow-up. Also, grading the incompleteness of revascularization through the residual SYNTAX score identified a higher event rate, suggesting that complete revascularization is associated with a better prognosis.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估 SYNTAX 评分 I、II 和残余值与接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者心血管结局的相关性,并在长期随访中比较这两种手术。

方法

这是巴西圣保罗大学心脏研究所 MASS 注册中心的一项回顾性单中心研究,共纳入 969 例稳定性冠状动脉疾病患者,分别行 CABG(559 例)或 PCI(410 例)。我们评估了两种干预措施中的 SYNTAX 评分 I、II 和残余值。临床终点为全因死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和再次血运重建(MACCE)的复合首次发生,以及 MACCE 的每个组成部分的总发生。

结果

在 CABG 样本中,SSI 的中位数为 23(IQR 17-29.5),SSII 的中位数为 25.4(IQR 19.2-32.8),rSS 的中位数为 2(IQR 0-6.5);在 PCI 中,SSI 的中位数为 14(IQR 10-19.1),SSII 的中位数为 28.7(IQR 23-34.2),rSS 的中位数为 4.7(IQR 0-9)。共记录了 174 例事件,CABG 患者的 MACCE 发生率较低(15.6% vs. 21.2%;调整后的 HR 1.98;95%CI 1.13-3.47;P=0.016)和再次血运重建(3.8% vs. 11.5%;调整后的 HR 4.35;95%CI 1.74-10.85;P=0.002)低于 PCI。在多变量分析中,rSS 是 MACCE 的独立预测因子(HR 1.04;95%CI 1.01-1.06;P=0.001)。关于死亡,唯一的独立预测因子是射血分数和肾功能。

结论

在长期随访中,手术血运重建可实现更完全的血运重建,并降低主要心脏或脑血管事件的发生率。此外,通过残余 SYNTAX 评分评估血运重建的不完全程度可确定更高的事件发生率,这表明完全血运重建与更好的预后相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6b/8418036/57644f4ff706/13019_2021_1616_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6b/8418036/8c10896af333/13019_2021_1616_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6b/8418036/57644f4ff706/13019_2021_1616_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6b/8418036/8c10896af333/13019_2021_1616_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e6b/8418036/57644f4ff706/13019_2021_1616_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical and percutaneous revascularization outcomes based on SYNTAX I, II, and residual scores: a long-term follow-up study.基于 SYNTAX I、II 和残余评分的手术和经皮血运重建结果:一项长期随访研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 3;16(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01616-6.
2
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对三血管病变患者的比较:SYNTAX 试验的最终五年随访结果。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.
3
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
4
Long-term outcomes and comparison after conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for left main disease between patients classified as percutaneous coronary intervention recommendation classes II and III.对于被归类为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗推荐等级为II级和III级的患者,在接受传统冠状动脉搭桥术治疗左主干病变后的长期预后及比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar;45(3):431-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt429. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
5
Incidence, Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes of Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The SYNTAX Trial at 5 Years.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术后重复血运重建的发生率、特征、预测因素和结果:SYNTAX 试验 5 年随访。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2493-2507. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.044.
6
Incidence, predictors and outcomes of incomplete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting: a subgroup analysis of 3-year SYNTAX data.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术后不完全血运重建的发生率、预测因素和结局:SYNTAX 数据 3 年亚组分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Mar;41(3):535-41. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr105. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting in emergency and non-emergency unprotected left-main revascularization.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术在急诊和非急诊非保护左主干血运重建中的应用比较。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 1;28(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01189-1.
8
Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建与冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床结局:6项随机试验和4686例患者的荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18.
9
[Efficacy comparison of 3 strategies for real-world stable coronary artery disease patients with three-vessel disease].[三种策略对真实世界中三支血管病变稳定型冠心病患者的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 24;45(12):1049-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.12.009.
10
Treatment of complex coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes: 5-year results comparing outcomes of bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in the SYNTAX trial.糖尿病患者复杂冠状动脉疾病的治疗:SYNTAX 试验比较旁路手术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 5 年结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt017. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Significance of Simple Inflammatory Markers in Off Pump Surgery-Review.非体外循环手术中简单炎症标志物的意义——综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 9;23(12):400. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2312400. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Long-term effects of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery surgery in elderly with multi-vessel coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉搭桥手术对老年多支冠状动脉疾病患者的长期影响。
Egypt Heart J. 2022 Dec 28;74(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s43044-022-00323-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality After Repeat Revascularization Following PCI or CABG for Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.左主干病变经 PCI 或 CABG 重复血运重建后的死亡率:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 10;13(3):375-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.019. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
2
SYNTAX Score and SYNTAX Score II Can Predict the Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Left Main and/or 3-Vessel Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Contemporary Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent Era.在当代钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架时代,SYNTAX评分和SYNTAX评分II能够预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的左主干和/或三支血管病变患者的临床结局。
Korean Circ J. 2020 Jan;50(1):22-34. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0097. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
3
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and the SYNTAX score: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、冠状动脉旁路移植术和 SYNTAX 评分:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 2;7:43801. doi: 10.1038/srep43801.
4
Incidence, Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes of Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The SYNTAX Trial at 5 Years.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术后重复血运重建的发生率、特征、预测因素和结果:SYNTAX 试验 5 年随访。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2493-2507. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.044.
5
Prognostic utility of the SYNTAX score in patients with single versus multivessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY [ACUITY] trial).SYNTAX 评分在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的单支血管病变与多支血管病变患者中的预后价值(来自急性血管造影和紧急介入治疗策略试验 [ACUITY])。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15;113(2):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.035. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
6
Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies.多支血管病变患者完全血运重建与不完全血运重建的结局比较:随机临床试验和观察性研究中 89883 例患者的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):1421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.033. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
7
Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II.解剖学和临床特征指导个体患者冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗决策:SYNTAX 评分 II 的制定和验证。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):639-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60108-7.
8
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在三支病变合并左主干病变患者中的比较:随机、临床 SYNTAX 试验的 5 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):629-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60141-5.
9
Quantification and impact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后未经治疗的冠状动脉疾病的量化和影响:残余 SYNTAX(紫杉醇与心脏手术联合 PCI 的协同作用)评分。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 12;59(24):2165-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
10
Integrating the Synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score into practice: use, pitfalls, and new directions.将经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与 Taxus 和心脏手术(SYNTAX)评分的协同作用整合到实践中:使用、陷阱和新方向。
Am Heart J. 2011 Mar;161(3):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.018. Epub 2011 Jan 31.