• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜套扎治疗胃窦血管扩张症的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Dec;94(6):1021-1029.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.017
PMID:34480922
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is typically treated by endoscopic thermal therapies. Endoscopic band ligation (EBL) has been reported in the treatment of GAVE with encouraging results. However, EBL is not widely used to this end.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases (inception to May 2021) to identify studies reporting on the use of EBL in the treatment of GAVE. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates; I values and 95% prediction intervals were calculated to assess the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Ten studies (194 patients) were included in the final analysis. The pooled rate of treatment responders with EBL in GAVE was 81% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62.2-91.7), and GAVE recurrence was 15.4% (95% CI, 4.5-41.3). The pooled mean number of treatment sessions required was 2.4 (95% CI, 2.2-2.7), and the number of bands used to achieve eradication per patient was 15.1 (95% CI, 10.7-19.4). The pooled mean difference of pre- to post-treatment hemoglobin was 1.5 (95% CI, .9-2.2; P = .001), pre- to post-treatment units of packed red blood cells transfused was 1.1 (95% CI, .4-1.9; P = .002), and pre- to post-treatment hospital length of stay was .5 days (95% CI, .1-.9; P = .01). The pooled rate of overall adverse events was 15.9% (95% CI, 10.4-23.7).

CONCLUSIONS

EBL demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes in the treatment of GAVE with minimal adverse events. Multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing EBL and other modalities as initial therapy are warranted.

摘要

背景和目的

胃底腺血管扩张症(GAVE)通常采用内镜热疗进行治疗。有报道称,内镜套扎(EBL)治疗 GAVE 效果令人鼓舞,但并未广泛应用于该疾病。

方法

我们对多个数据库(从创建到 2021 年 5 月)进行了全面检索,以确定报道 EBL 治疗 GAVE 的研究。采用随机效应模型计算汇总率;采用 I ²值和 95%预测区间评估异质性。

结果

最终分析纳入 10 项研究(194 例患者)。EBL 治疗 GAVE 的应答率为 81%(95%置信区间[CI],62.2%-91.7%),GAVE 复发率为 15.4%(95%CI,4.5%-41.3%)。汇总的平均治疗次数为 2.4 次(95%CI,2.2-2.7),每位患者使用的套扎圈数为 15.1 个(95%CI,10.7-19.4)。治疗前后血红蛋白的平均差值为 1.5g/dL(95%CI,0.9-2.2;P=0.001),治疗前后输注的浓缩红细胞单位数平均差值为 1.1 个单位(95%CI,0.4-1.9;P=0.002),治疗前后的住院时间平均差值为 0.5 天(95%CI,0.1-0.9;P=0.01)。总的不良事件发生率为 15.9%(95%CI,10.4%-23.7%)。

结论

EBL 治疗 GAVE 效果显著,不良事件发生率低。需要开展多中心随机对照试验,比较 EBL 与其他治疗方法作为初始治疗的效果。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜套扎治疗胃窦血管扩张症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Dec;94(6):1021-1029.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
2
Endoscopic band ligation compared to thermal therapy for gastric antral vascular ectasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜套扎与热治疗用于胃窦血管扩张症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Mar;9(2):150-158. doi: 10.1177/2050640620975243. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
Comparisons Between Endoscopic Band Ligation, Radiofrequency Ablation and Endoscopic Thermal Therapy for Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: A Meta-Analysis.内镜套扎、射频消融与内镜热治疗胃底贲门血管扩张症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Sep;68(9):3534-3541. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08028-7. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
4
Treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia (watermelon stomach) with endoscopic band ligation.内镜下套扎术治疗胃窦血管扩张症(西瓜胃)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Aug;68(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
5
Endoscopic Band Ligation Versus Argon Plasma Coagulation in the Treatment of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.内镜下套扎术与氩离子凝固术治疗胃窦血管扩张症的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Endosc. 2021 Sep;54(5):669-677. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.063. Epub 2021 May 31.
6
Band ligation of gastric antral vascular ectasia is a safe and effective endoscopic treatment.胃窦血管扩张症的套扎治疗是一种安全有效的内镜治疗方法。
Dig Endosc. 2013 Jul;25(4):392-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01410.x. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
7
Gastric antral vascular ectasia in portal hypertensive children: Endoscopic band ligation versus argon plasma coagulation.门脉高压儿童胃底贲门血管扩张症:内镜套扎与氩等离子凝固术。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Aug;54(8):1691-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
8
Endoscopic treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia in real-life settings: Argon plasma coagulation or endoscopic band ligation?真实环境中胃窦血管扩张症的内镜治疗:氩离子凝固术还是内镜套扎术?
J Dig Dis. 2021 Jan;22(1):23-30. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12958. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
9
Randomized controlled study of endoscopic band ligation and argon plasma coagulation in the treatment of gastric antral and fundal vascular ectasia.内镜套扎和氩离子凝固术治疗胃窦和胃底部血管扩张的随机对照研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Jun;4(3):423-8. doi: 10.1177/2050640615619837. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
10
Gastric antral vascular ectasia: a prospective study of treatment with endoscopic band ligation.胃窦血管扩张症:内镜下套扎治疗的前瞻性研究
Endoscopy. 2015 Jun;47(6):538-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391395. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-occurrence of Gastric Xanthoma and Numerous Large Hyperplastic Polyps as a Complication of Argon Plasma Coagulation in GAVE.胃黄色瘤与大量大的增生性息肉同时出现作为胃窦血管扩张症氩离子凝固术的一种并发症
ACG Case Rep J. 2025 Jun 9;12(6):e01728. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001728. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Endoscopic Band Ligation for Weight Loss: Exploring the Gastric Antrum as a Promising Target.内镜下套扎术用于减肥:探索胃窦作为一个有前景的靶点。
Obes Surg. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07937-y.
3
Confocal laser endomicroscopy features of gastric antral vascular ectasia.
胃窦血管扩张症的共聚焦激光内镜特征
Endoscopy. 2025 Dec;57(S 01):E361-E362. doi: 10.1055/a-2584-1623. Epub 2025 May 6.
4
A case report of gastric antral vascular ectasia treated by endoscopic band ligation combined with lauromacrogol injection.内镜下套扎联合聚桂醇注射治疗胃窦血管扩张症一例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 24;104(4):e41235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041235.
5
Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Its Endoscopic Management.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血及其内镜治疗。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024 May 20;35(8):599-608. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23507.
6
Comparisons Between Endoscopic Band Ligation, Radiofrequency Ablation and Endoscopic Thermal Therapy for Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: A Meta-Analysis.内镜套扎、射频消融与内镜热治疗胃底贲门血管扩张症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Sep;68(9):3534-3541. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08028-7. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
7
Austrian consensus on the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension in advanced chronic liver disease (Billroth IV).奥地利共识:晚期慢性肝病中门静脉高压的诊断与管理(Billroth IV)。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Sep;135(Suppl 3):493-523. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02229-w. Epub 2023 Jun 26.