• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用克拉屈滨(片剂)治疗缓解型多发性硬化症成年患者的药物经济学方面]

[Pharmacoeconomic aspects of using cladribine (in tablets) for treatment of adult patients with remitting multiple sclerosis].

作者信息

Avxentyev N A, Davydovskaya M V, Makarova Y V, Frolov M Yu, Klabukova D L

机构信息

Financial Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.

The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2021;121(8):30-36. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202112108130.

DOI:10.17116/jnevro202112108130
PMID:34481433
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a pharmacoeconomic analysis of using cladribine (in tablets) as a second-line treatment option for adult patients with highly active remitting multiple sclerosis in Russia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Current treatment practice of highly active multiple sclerosis (natalizumab, fingolimod, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab) was considered as a comparator for cladribine (in tablets). Clinical and economic study was conducted using the «cost minimization» method. For budget impact analysis cost of using cladribine (in tablets) was compared to the cost of using current treatment practice.

RESULTS

Cladribine in tablets is a cost-saving alternative for treatment of patients with highly active multiple sclerosis compared to the current treatment practice. Within a 4-year period direct medical costs reduction is 2 million RUB (50.1%) per person.

CONCLUSION

In case of switching the patients, who are currently provided with other disease modifying drugs, to cladribine, in 4 years health budget will save up to 6284 million RUB (50.1%).

摘要

目的

对俄罗斯成年高度活动性复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者使用克拉屈滨(片剂)作为二线治疗方案进行药物经济学分析。

材料与方法

将高度活动性多发性硬化症的当前治疗方法(那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德、阿仑单抗、奥瑞珠单抗)作为克拉屈滨(片剂)的对照。采用“成本最小化”方法进行临床和经济学研究。为进行预算影响分析,将使用克拉屈滨(片剂)的成本与使用当前治疗方法的成本进行比较。

结果

与当前治疗方法相比,克拉屈滨片剂是治疗高度活动性多发性硬化症患者的一种节省成本的替代方案。在4年期间,每人直接医疗成本降低200万卢布(50.1%)。

结论

如果目前接受其他疾病修正药物治疗的患者改用克拉屈滨,4年内卫生预算将节省高达6.284亿卢布(50.1%)。

相似文献

1
[Pharmacoeconomic aspects of using cladribine (in tablets) for treatment of adult patients with remitting multiple sclerosis].[使用克拉屈滨(片剂)治疗缓解型多发性硬化症成年患者的药物经济学方面]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2021;121(8):30-36. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202112108130.
2
Cost Assessment Modelling of Treatments for Highly Active Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.高活性复发型多发性硬化症治疗的成本评估模型。
Adv Ther. 2020 Feb;37(2):800-818. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01186-z. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets, alemtuzumab, and natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in England.在英国,克拉屈滨片、阿仑单抗和那他珠单抗治疗疾病活动度高的复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2018 Jul;21(7):676-686. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1461630. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
Economic evaluation of cladribine tablets in high disease activity (HDA) relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) patients in Lebanon.在黎巴嫩,对高疾病活动(HDA)复发型多发性硬化症(RMS)患者使用克拉屈滨片进行经济评价。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Nov;67:104169. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104169. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets versus fingolimod in patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis in Portugal.在葡萄牙,克拉屈滨片与芬戈莫德治疗高度活跃复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2020 May;23(5):484-491. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1717499. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
6
Estimating the comparative efficacy of cladribine tablets versus alternative disease modifying treatments in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: adjusting for patient characteristics using meta-regression and matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison approaches.评估克拉屈滨片与其他疾病修正治疗药物在活跃复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的比较疗效:使用荟萃回归和匹配调整间接治疗比较方法调整患者特征。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Aug;35(8):1371-1378. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1585779. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
7
Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of cladribine tablets versus alternative disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析:氯法拉滨片剂与其他疾病修正治疗药物治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疗效比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Aug;34(8):1361-1371. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1407303. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
8
Cost Effectiveness of Cladribine Tablets for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in The Netherlands.克拉屈滨片治疗荷兰复发性缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效果分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Dec;17(6):857-873. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00500-8.
9
Comparative effectiveness of cladribine tablets versus fingolimod in the treatment of highly active multiple sclerosis: A real-world study.氯法拉滨片与芬戈莫德治疗活跃期多发性硬化症的疗效比较:一项真实世界研究。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Aug;76:104791. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104791. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
10
Benefit-risk Assessment of Cladribine Using Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis.采用多准则决策分析(MCDA)评估克拉屈滨治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的获益风险。
Clin Ther. 2019 Feb;41(2):249-260.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.015.