• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨盆倾斜度预测骨盆入射角与腰椎前凸值差值的可重复性和准确性。

Reproducibility and Accuracy of Pelvic Tilt in Predicting the Difference Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis Value.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University, Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2021 Nov;155:e621-e629. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.119. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.119
PMID:34482011
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the pelvic morphologic factors that determine the degree of pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch.

METHODS

Overall, 306 patients were included. The regional and global sagittal parameters were measured. Linear regression analyses were performed for 4 pelvic parameters and PI-LL mismatch. E1 and E2 were defined as linear regression equations between pelvic tilt (PT) and PI-LL mismatch and PI and PI-LL mismatch, respectively. The patients were categorized by cluster analysis using the hierarchal method for the 4 pelvic parameters.

RESULTS

E1 and E2 showed statistical significance; however, the coefficient of determination of E1 was higher than that of E2 (R = 0.675 vs. 0.238; P < 0.01). Sex, LL, E1, and E2 showed significant differences in the regional parameters. The T1 pelvic angle (TPA), spinosacral angle (SSA), and incidence angle of inflection points (IAIPs) showed significant differences in global parameters (P < 0.01). The IAIPs and TPA were low in the anteverted pelvis group and high in the retroverted pelvis group (P < 0.001). The SSA was low in the small pelvis group and high in the large pelvis group (P < 0.001). The proportion of women in the large pelvis group (93%) was significantly higher than that in the other groups (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The individual differences between the PI and LL values can be more accurately determined using the individual PT, and the optimal PT amount will differ depending on the pelvis shape. The increase in the TPA and IAIPs corresponded to the PT, and the SSA increased in accordance with the pelvic size.

摘要

目的

研究决定骨盆入射角(PI)-腰椎前凸(LL)不匹配程度的骨盆形态学因素。

方法

共纳入 306 例患者。测量局部和整体矢状参数。对 4 项骨盆参数和 PI-LL 不匹配进行线性回归分析。E1 和 E2 分别为骨盆倾斜(PT)与 PI-LL 不匹配和 PI 与 PI-LL 不匹配之间的线性回归方程。使用层次聚类分析方法对 4 项骨盆参数对患者进行分类。

结果

E1 和 E2 具有统计学意义;然而,E1 的决定系数高于 E2(R=0.675 比 0.238;P<0.01)。性别、LL、E1 和 E2 在局部参数中存在显著差异。在全局参数中,T1 骨盆角(TPA)、骶骨角(SSA)和拐点入射角(IAIPs)存在显著差异(P<0.01)。IAIPs 和 TPA 在前倾骨盆组中较低,在后倾骨盆组中较高(P<0.001)。SSA 在小骨盆组中较低,在大骨盆组中较高(P<0.001)。大骨盆组中女性的比例(93%)明显高于其他组(P<0.01)。

结论

使用个体 PT 可以更准确地确定 PI 和 LL 值之间的个体差异,并且最佳 PT 量将根据骨盆形状而有所不同。TPA 和 IAIPs 的增加与 PT 相对应,而 SSA 则随着骨盆大小的增加而增加。

相似文献

1
Reproducibility and Accuracy of Pelvic Tilt in Predicting the Difference Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis Value.骨盆倾斜度预测骨盆入射角与腰椎前凸值差值的可重复性和准确性。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Nov;155:e621-e629. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.119. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
2
The Lumbar Pelvic Angle, the Lumbar Component of the T1 Pelvic Angle, Correlates With HRQOL, PI-LL Mismatch, and it Predicts Global Alignment.腰椎骨盆角、T1 骨盆角的腰椎成分与 HRQOL、PI-LL 不匹配相关,可预测整体对线。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 May 15;43(10):681-687. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002346.
3
The influence of spinopelvic morphologies on sagittal spinal alignment: an analysis of incidence angle of inflection points.脊柱骨盆形态对矢状位脊柱排列的影响:拐点角度发生率的分析。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Apr;29(4):831-839. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06329-3. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
Association of Sagittal Spinopelvic Realignment with Correction in Lower Lumbar Lordosis after Surgical Treatment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.矢状位脊柱骨盆参数矫正与退行性腰椎侧凸后路矫形术后下腰椎前凸改善的相关性。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2034-2042. doi: 10.1111/os.13138. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
5
Analysis of Spino-pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Young Chinese Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation.中国年轻腰椎间盘突出症患者的脊柱-骨盆矢状位对线分析
Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug;9(3):271-276. doi: 10.1111/os.12340.
6
Comparison of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Thoracolumbar Fracture.强直性脊柱炎与胸腰椎骨折患者矢状位脊柱骨盆对线的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(4):e2585. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002585.
7
Predictive model of global tilt (GT) determined by individual thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence in the human degenerative spine.基于个体胸椎后凸、腰椎前凸和骨盆入射角预测退行性脊柱中人的整体倾斜(GT)的模型。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Nov;30(11):3191-3199. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06947-5. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
8
Optimum pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis value can be determined by individual pelvic incidence.最佳骨盆入射角减去腰椎前凸值可根据个体骨盆入射角来确定。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3638-3643. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4563-8. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
9
Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults.特发性脊柱侧凸的术前术后矢状平衡:两个 132 名青少年和 52 名成年人队列年龄的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S203-15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2571-x. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
10
Is spinopelvic compensation associated with unstable gait?: Analysis using whole spine X-rays and a two-point accelerometer during gait in healthy adults.脊柱骨盆补偿与不稳定步态有关吗?:在健康成年人步态中使用全脊柱 X 射线和双点加速度计进行的分析。
Gait Posture. 2024 Jun;111:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.04.013. Epub 2024 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of spinopelvic sagittal alignment and its correlations in asymptomatic pediatric populations.无症状儿童人群中脊柱骨盆矢状面排列及其相关性的研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6847. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91481-3.