University of New South Wales, School of Psychology, Australia; Macquarie University, Department of Cognitive Sciences, Australia.
University of New South Wales, School of Psychology, Australia.
Cortex. 2021 Oct;143:237-253. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
Visual working memory paradigms involve retaining and manipulating visual information in mind over a period of seconds. Evidence suggests that visual imagery (sensory recruitment) is a strategy used by many to retain visual information during such tasks, leading some researchers to propose that visual imagery and visual working memory may be one and the same. If visual imagery is essential to visual working memory task performance there should be large ramifications for a special population of individuals who do not experience visual imagery, aphantasia. Here we assessed visual working memory task performance in this population using a number of different lab and clinical working memory tasks. We found no differences in capacity limits for visual, general number or spatial working memory for aphantasic individuals compared to controls. Further, aphantasic individuals showed no significant differences in performance on visual components of clinical working memory tests as compared to verbal components. However, there were significant differences in the reported strategies used by aphantasic individuals across all memory tasks. Additionally, aphantasic individual's visual memory accuracy did not demonstrate a significant oblique orientation effect, which is proposed to occur due to sensory recruitment, further supporting their non-visual imagery strategy reports. Taken together these data demonstrate that aphantasic individuals are not impaired on visual working memory tasks, suggesting visual imagery and working memory are not one and the same, with imagery (and sensory recruitment) being just one of the tools that can be used to solve visual working memory tasks.
视觉工作记忆范式涉及在几秒钟的时间内在大脑中保留和处理视觉信息。有证据表明,视觉意象(感觉募集)是许多人在执行此类任务时用来保留视觉信息的一种策略,这导致一些研究人员提出视觉意象和视觉工作记忆可能是一回事。如果视觉意象对于视觉工作记忆任务的表现至关重要,那么对于那些没有体验过视觉意象的特殊人群——失认症患者,将会产生重大影响。在这里,我们使用多种不同的实验室和临床工作记忆任务评估了该人群的视觉工作记忆任务表现。我们发现,与对照组相比,失认症患者在视觉、一般数字或空间工作记忆的容量限制方面没有差异。此外,与言语成分相比,失认症患者在临床工作记忆测试的视觉成分上的表现没有显著差异。然而,在所有记忆任务中,失认症患者报告的策略存在显著差异。此外,失认症患者的视觉记忆准确性没有表现出显著的斜向定向效应,据推测,这是由于感觉募集所致,进一步支持了他们的非视觉意象策略报告。综上所述,这些数据表明,失认症患者在视觉工作记忆任务上没有受损,这表明视觉意象和工作记忆不是一回事,意象(和感觉募集)只是解决视觉工作记忆任务的众多工具之一。