• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同降糖措施对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇母婴结局的影响:一项网状Meta分析

Effects of Different Glucose-Lowering Measures on Maternal and Infant Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Network Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ouyang Hong, Wu Na

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Clinical Skills Practice Teaching Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2021 Oct;12(10):2715-2753. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01142-7. Epub 2021 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-021-01142-7
PMID:34482529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8479018/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare and rank the effects of different glucose-lowering measures on maternal and infant outcomes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, CNKI, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, and Weipu databases for relevant studies published between database establishment and June 2021. Study retrieval involved subject-heading and keyword searches. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with different glucose-lowering treatments for GDM patients were included. The Cochrane tool was used to assess bias risk. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were used to compare and rank the effects of different hypoglycemic measures on maternal and infant outcomes in pregnant women with GDM.

RESULTS

We included 41 RCTs involving 6245 pregnant women with GDM. Patients treated with insulin had a higher incidence of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) occupancy (1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.7) than those treated with metformin. The insulin (1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1 and 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.3) and glyburide (2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2 and 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-8.4) groups exhibited higher incidences of neonatal hypoglycemia and large for gestational age (LGA) newborns than the metformin group. The glyburide group exhibited a lower probability of cesarean section than the metformin (0.76, 95% CI 0.55-1.0) and insulin (0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96) groups. Preeclampsia incidence in the diet and exercise groups was significantly lower than in the metformin (0.19, 95% CI 0.043-0.72) and insulin (0.15, 95% CI 0.032-0.52) groups. No intervention significantly reduced the incidences of macrosomia, preterm birth, gestational hypertension, or respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The ranking results showed that the metformin group had the lowest rates of neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia, LGA, and NICU occupancy. The glyburide group had the lowest NICU occupancy and cesarean section rates and the highest neonatal hypoglycemia, LGA, preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension rates. The diet and exercise group had the lowest preterm delivery and preeclampsia rates and the highest NICU occupancy rate.

CONCLUSION

Metformin is a potentially superior choice for GDM treatment because it is associated with minimal incidences of multiple adverse pregnancy outcome indicators and does not lead to high values of certain adverse outcome indices. Other hypoglycemic agent or diet groups exhibit high incidences of certain adverse outcomes. Therefore, when selecting a GDM treatment strategy, the efficacies and risks of different treatment programs should be evaluated according to the scenario in hand.

摘要

引言

进行了一项网状Meta分析,以比较和排序不同降糖措施对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)孕妇母婴结局的影响。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、CNKI、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、万方和维普数据库,查找在数据库建立至2021年6月期间发表的相关研究。研究检索涉及主题词和关键词搜索。纳入了对GDM患者采用不同降糖治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险。采用成对和网状Meta分析来比较和排序不同降糖措施对GDM孕妇母婴结局的影响。

结果

我们纳入了41项RCT,涉及6245例GDM孕妇。接受胰岛素治疗的患者入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的发生率(1.3,95%CI 1.0 - 1.7)高于接受二甲双胍治疗的患者。胰岛素组(1.5,95%CI 1.1 - 2.1和1.8,95%CI 1.0 - 3.3)和格列本脲组(2.0,95%CI 1.2 - 3.2和2.5,95%CI 1.1 - 8.4)的新生儿低血糖和大于胎龄(LGA)新生儿的发生率高于二甲双胍组。格列本脲组剖宫产的概率低于二甲双胍组(0.76,95%CI 0.55 - 1.0)和胰岛素组(0.71,95%CI 0.52 - 0.96)。饮食和运动组的子痫前期发生率显著低于二甲双胍组(0.19,95%CI 0.043 - 0.72)和胰岛素组(0.15,95%CI 0.032 - 0.52)。没有干预措施能显著降低巨大儿、早产、妊娠期高血压或呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的发生率。排序结果显示,二甲双胍组新生儿低血糖、巨大儿、LGA和入住NICU的发生率最低。格列本脲组入住NICU和剖宫产率最低,但新生儿低血糖、LGA、子痫前期和妊娠期高血压发生率最高。饮食和运动组早产和子痫前期发生率最低,但入住NICU率最高。

结论

二甲双胍是GDM治疗的一个潜在更佳选择,因为它与多种不良妊娠结局指标的最低发生率相关,且不会导致某些不良结局指标的高值。其他降糖药物或饮食组某些不良结局的发生率较高。因此,在选择GDM治疗策略时,应根据具体情况评估不同治疗方案的疗效和风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a5/8479018/56397f7be2bd/13300_2021_1142_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a5/8479018/0d4d4fa509b3/13300_2021_1142_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a5/8479018/1f2ab94f958d/13300_2021_1142_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a5/8479018/061e2ede7b91/13300_2021_1142_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a5/8479018/56397f7be2bd/13300_2021_1142_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a5/8479018/0d4d4fa509b3/13300_2021_1142_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a5/8479018/1f2ab94f958d/13300_2021_1142_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a5/8479018/061e2ede7b91/13300_2021_1142_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/64a5/8479018/56397f7be2bd/13300_2021_1142_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Different Glucose-Lowering Measures on Maternal and Infant Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Network Meta-analysis.不同降糖措施对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇母婴结局的影响:一项网状Meta分析
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Oct;12(10):2715-2753. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01142-7. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin in treating gestational diabetes mellitus: An updated PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis.口服抗糖尿病药物与胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病的疗效和安全性比较:一项更新的符合PRISMA标准的网状Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(38):e7939. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007939.
3
A meta-analysis of metformin and insulin on maternal outcome and neonatal outcome in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.二甲双胍和胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病患者的母婴结局的荟萃分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024 Dec;37(1):2295809. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2295809. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
4
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Metformin, Glyburide, and Insulin in Treating Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.二甲双胍、格列本脲和胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病的疗效和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Res. 2019 Nov 4;2019:9804708. doi: 10.1155/2019/9804708. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparison of Insulin, Metformin, and Glyburide on Perinatal Complications of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胰岛素、二甲双胍和格列本脲在妊娠期糖尿病围产期并发症中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2021;86(3):218-230. doi: 10.1159/000515893. Epub 2021 May 12.
6
Can glyburide be advocated over subcutaneous insulin for perinatal outcomes of women with gestational diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.对于患有妊娠期糖尿病的女性,能否提倡使用格列吡嗪而不是皮下胰岛素来改善围产期结局?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;301(1):19-32. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05430-3. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
7
Comparative efficacy and safety of OADs in management of GDM: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.口服抗糖尿病药物治疗妊娠期糖尿病的疗效与安全性比较:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 May;100(5):2071-80. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4403. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
8
Metformin is comparable to insulin for pharmacotherapy in gestational diabetes mellitus: A network meta-analysis evaluating 6046 women.二甲双胍在治疗妊娠期糖尿病的药物治疗方面可与胰岛素相媲美:一项评估 6046 名女性的网络荟萃分析。
Pharmacol Res. 2021 May;167:105546. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105546. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
9
Neonatal, infant, and childhood growth following metformin versus insulin treatment for gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.二甲双胍与胰岛素治疗妊娠期糖尿病对新生儿、婴儿和儿童生长的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Aug 6;16(8):e1002848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002848. eCollection 2019 Aug.
10
Glycemic control and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated using glyburide, metformin, or insulin: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.使用格列吡嗪、二甲双胍或胰岛素治疗的妊娠期糖尿病女性的血糖控制和新生儿结局:一项成对和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Oct 12;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00865-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Neonatal amino acid metabolism in gestational diabetes mellitus mothers treated with different treatment strategies.不同治疗策略治疗的妊娠期糖尿病母亲的新生儿氨基酸代谢
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s40200-024-01522-3. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Infant body composition trajectories differ by in utero exposure to gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort from birth to 12 months.婴儿身体成分轨迹因子宫内暴露于妊娠期糖尿病而有所不同:一项从出生到12个月的前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Jan;121(1):40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.020. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Management of Endocrinopathies During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex-Dependent Association of Vitamin D With Insulin Resistance in Humans.性别依赖性维生素 D 与人类胰岛素抵抗的关系。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Aug 18;106(9):e3739-e3747. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab213.
2
Comparison of Insulin, Metformin, and Glyburide on Perinatal Complications of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胰岛素、二甲双胍和格列本脲在妊娠期糖尿病围产期并发症中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2021;86(3):218-230. doi: 10.1159/000515893. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
The diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and its impact on In Vitro Fertilization pregnancies. A pilot study.
妊娠期内分泌疾病的管理:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):e70554. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70554. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Effects of different periodontal interventions on the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同牙周干预措施对孕妇不良妊娠结局风险的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 20;12:1373691. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1373691. eCollection 2024.
5
Pharmacoepidemiology in pregnancy: analysis protocol for an observational cohort study in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.孕期药物流行病学:英国临床实践研究数据链观察性队列研究的分析方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Jan 12;7:12. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17523.1. eCollection 2022.
6
Changing Meal Sequence Affects Glucose Excursions in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.改变用餐顺序对妊娠期糖尿病患者的血糖波动有影响。
J Diabetes Res. 2022 Jul 21;2022:7083106. doi: 10.1155/2022/7083106. eCollection 2022.
妊娠期糖尿病的诊断及其对体外受精妊娠的影响。一项试点研究。
J Diabetes Complications. 2021 Jun;35(6):107914. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.107914. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
4
The effects of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control and maternal-neonatal outcomes in women with established gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.维生素 D 补充对已确诊妊娠期糖尿病妇女血糖控制和母婴结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Nutr. 2021 May;40(5):3148-3157. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
5
Vitamin D and pregnancy outcomes: Overall results of the FEPED study.维生素 D 与妊娠结局:FEPED 研究的综合结果。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Oct;49(8):101883. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101883. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
Serum vitamin D deficiency and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.血清维生素D缺乏与妊娠期糖尿病风险:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Apr 15;16(4):742-751. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.94433. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparative impact of pharmacological treatments for gestational diabetes on neonatal anthropometry independent of maternal glycaemic control: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较不同药物治疗妊娠期糖尿病对新生儿体格生长的影响,不考虑母体血糖控制情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 May 22;17(5):e1003126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003126. eCollection 2020 May.
8
Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自然妊娠或辅助生殖技术(ART)后单胎妊娠的女性患妊娠期糖尿病的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Jun 18;26(4):514-544. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa011.
9
Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.已知有妊娠糖尿病史的女性发展为 2 型糖尿病的情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 May 13;369:m1361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1361.
10
Associated perinatal determinants of vanishing twin pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilization vs. spontaneous conception.体外受精与自然受孕后消失的双胞胎妊娠的相关围产因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Feb;301(2):491-498. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05448-y. Epub 2020 Feb 5.